| Author |
Message |
davidarts

Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 790
Location: Italy
|
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:00 am
| |
Hi guys,
It's a new cool features!
I've got the first "Single & Other Downloads" for 4,5$.
Very interesting!!
What about you?
DAvid |
|
baz777

Joined: 03 Dec 2008
Posts: 3441
Location: No idea, I'm old!
|
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 7:09 am
| |
None yet for me
Life isn't fair, no one loves me!!!!!!! |
|
chevsy

Joined: 19 Feb 2010
Posts: 39
Location: Bedfordshire , UK
|
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 8:01 am
| |
Wow Awesome David thanks for heads up! :) Will cross my fingers and hope for some of these in the future. |
|
toots7777

Joined: 06 Apr 2009
Posts: 4528
Location: Tenerife, Canary Islands
|
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 8:10 am
| |
Nice one David, but how did the sale calculate to $4.50? I'm confused now.
I thought the single image was priced at $19 a download, and then you got a percentage equivalent to your ranking, like 20% 25% etc.
$4.50 doesn't equate to either 20% or 25% of $19.
Anyway, still better than a regular or an OD. |
|
morphart

Joined: 27 Feb 2009
Posts: 19
|
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 8:19 am
| |
4.50$ is definitely interesting :) It thought our royalty would have been cheaper than that... but if they really go for 19$ per image then great news for us.
Let's hope this product finds a market for it, but so far Shutterstock is still leading the market...
Good news it seems! :) |
|
apotterdd

Joined: 10 Apr 2009
Posts: 7005
Location: Trying to get my latinum back from Quark
|
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 11:23 am
| |
| toots7777 wrote: | Nice one David, but how did the sale calculate to $4.50? I'm confused now.
I thought the single image was priced at $19 a download, and then you got a percentage equivalent to your ranking, like 20% 25% etc.
$4.50 doesn't equate to either 20% or 25% of $19.
Anyway, still better than a regular or an OD. |
Yeah it doesn quite add up does it? If you're in the .33 tier you should be getting $4.75.
I'm with baz not gotten one yet.
*sings*
Nobody loves me everybody hates me I guess I'll go eat some worms *blah* |
|
evaners

Joined: 04 Mar 2008
Posts: 6594
Location: NO! We aren't there yet!
|
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 11:32 am
| |
Congrats David!
I haven't gotten one yet, either. Heck, today I'm having trouble just getting regular DLs. |
|
theohrm
Joined: 16 Aug 2009
Posts: 457
Location: Ireland
|
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 2:46 pm
| |
Oh, I want me one of those. Or several. |
|
akaiser

Joined: 09 Feb 2008
Posts: 2379
Location: Munich
|
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 11:00 pm
| |
Two of them here - one yesterday and another one today. I have no idea how provisions are being calculated, either. The first one made $5.70, the second one $5.10. *?*
Maybe one of them was a raster or such, you can't see *which* particular image was bought using the new feature, yet. I love it, noneoftheless, esp. because FT is strengthening their subscription model at the moment, which means a significant cut of earnings for most of their contributors. |
|
akaiser

Joined: 09 Feb 2008
Posts: 2379
Location: Munich
|
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 11:01 pm
| |
Closing in on a really *great* new BME here, btw. :) |
|
apotterdd

Joined: 10 Apr 2009
Posts: 7005
Location: Trying to get my latinum back from Quark
|
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 11:35 pm
| |
Anja ya have to scroll aaaaaaaall the way down to the bottom of the stats page to see which ones under the date that you got them on. Being at the bottom of that page is not a good convenience for it.
I haven't got one yet so I can't tell what would cause all the fluctuations in pricing going on. Some get it at the percentage it's supposed to be and other are just slightly less. Can't figure out why. |
|
akaiser

Joined: 09 Feb 2008
Posts: 2379
Location: Munich
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 12:41 am
| |
Ah, ok, found it down there. Thanks, Anita!! :)
Both were vectors, so, still wondering what made the difference ... Need to read the announcement again, I guess. :) |
|
apotterdd

Joined: 10 Apr 2009
Posts: 7005
Location: Trying to get my latinum back from Quark
|
Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 12:45 am
| |
That's what I'm not getting is that they're supposed to be a percentage based on your all time earnings. I'm wondering if it's a size thing but if your's were both vectors then what could it be that's making it less? |
|
davidarts

Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 790
Location: Italy
|
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 2:45 am
| |
I've got only one Single sales at the moment at it was a vector..
Anja did you find out why 5,70 and then 5,10? I'm curious! :-D
However if an image cost 19$... maybe it's more convenient the classic OD for 39$ ..you have 5 images hires instead of one...however if this model are goingo to sell like OD it could increase a lot our revenue...let's see!
toots: The percentage table said that earning is calculated on the 20,25 or 30% based on lifetime earnings... but We don't know how many prices options there are for every images... maybe low res cost less, hires more and vector even more. This could explane the difference between 4,50 and 5,70$...
However September was my ALL time BME here and also with the sum of every microstock agencies!! :-D I'm happy! |
|
bigldesign

Joined: 09 Jan 2007
Posts: 297
|
Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:22 pm
| |
Yay. Got my first one - $5.10. And 5 ODs today. Life is good at SS. |
|
| |
|