| Author |
Message |
ovisovata83
Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Posts: 24
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 2:09 pm
| |
Forest spring
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
205.21 KB |
| Viewed: |
811 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
189.66 KB |
| Viewed: |
811 Time(s) |

|
|
|
jeffbanke

Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17465
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 2:09 pm
| |
I didn't check on the disks, but the fewer the better, gives you more opportunity for sales:-)
On the stream, it too needs to lead somewhere, be nice if there was a lake there at the end or something
Forest spring is nice
BTW it does not look like your 100% crops are in fact 100% they look smaller
|
|
ovisovata83
Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Posts: 24
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 2:12 pm
| |
Feet in the sand
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
29.05 KB |
| Viewed: |
810 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
166.22 KB |
| Viewed: |
810 Time(s) |

|
|
|
ovisovata83
Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Posts: 24
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 2:13 pm
| |
Concept
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
123.39 KB |
| Viewed: |
807 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
63.25 KB |
| Viewed: |
807 Time(s) |

|
|
|
ovisovata83
Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Posts: 24
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 2:15 pm
| |
These are the uploads at this time... Please critique
Thanks
|
|
ruxpriencdiam

Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26257
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 2:20 pm
| |
Forget the feet in the sand.
The Euro i believe may be a copyright issue and your skin reflection in the wrench wont cut it.
|
|
pharm

Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 9406
Location: Never quite sure
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:06 pm
| |
Also, none of your crops are 100%. Without 100% crops, it's difficult to give you a complete evaluation. See this thread for an explanation:
http://submit.shutterstock.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=120676&sid=661305897a8122abeb4a647495ede671
Your crops are covering about a third of the entire image. The shot of the piano, for example...the original is 4288 x 2848 pixels. A 100% crop (500 x 500 pixels) should cover the area seen outlined in yellow below:
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
46.83 KB |
| Viewed: |
784 Time(s) |

|
|
|
pharm

Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 9406
Location: Never quite sure
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 4:24 pm
| |
One of the most common mistakes people make when trying to do a 100% crop is that they open the image at 100%, crop out a random area, THEN resize the crop so the longest side is 500 pixels. All is well until they get to the resizing part. If you resize the crop, it's no longer a 100% crop!
This is probably the easiest way:
-Open your image (the original one, not the resized one).
-Create a new image/file that's 500 x 500 pixels.
-Copy the original image (Select all/copy)
-Go to the new image/file you just created and paste (Ctrl-V)
-Move the image around until the part you want is visible.
-Flatten the image
-Save it with a NEW name (or you might overwrite the original)
Your new file will be a 100% crop that's 500 x 500 pixels.
|
|
ovisovata83
Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Posts: 24
|
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 3:41 am
| |
| pharm wrote: | One of the most common mistakes people make when trying to do a 100% crop is that they open the image at 100%, crop out a random area, THEN resize the crop so the longest side is 500 pixels. All is well until they get to the resizing part. If you resize the crop, it's no longer a 100% crop!
This is probably the easiest way:
-Open your image (the original one, not the resized one).
-Create a new image/file that's 500 x 500 pixels.
-Copy the original image (Select all/copy)
-Go to the new image/file you just created and paste (Ctrl-V)
-Move the image around until the part you want is visible.
-Flatten the image
-Save it with a NEW name (or you might overwrite the original)
Your new file will be a 100% crop that's 500 x 500 pixels. |
Thank you,
I was doing it the wrong way.
So, in conclusion I still have some work to do but it's always a pleasure.
|
|
ovisovata83
Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Posts: 24
|
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 12:41 pm
| |
Please critique these uploads...
Is there any chance in them being Shutterstock-worthy? :)
Thanks in advance,
Ovi
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
81.5 KB |
| Viewed: |
700 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
159.27 KB |
| Viewed: |
700 Time(s) |

|
|
|
ovisovata83
Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Posts: 24
|
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 12:41 pm
| |
Mountain lake
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
163.58 KB |
| Viewed: |
698 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
150.98 KB |
| Viewed: |
698 Time(s) |

|
|
|
ovisovata83
Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Posts: 24
|
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 12:43 pm
| |
Heavy clouds
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
75.32 KB |
| Viewed: |
696 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
43.71 KB |
| Viewed: |
696 Time(s) |

|
|
|
ruxpriencdiam

Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26257
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 12:49 pm
| |
The boat is OOF with noise in it.
The Alps are OOF with blown highlights, wrong WB/lighting,and noise in the water.
Heavy clouds are to forget B&W and it will get hit with lighting, noise and OOF.
|
|
jeffbanke

Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17465
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California
|
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 12:50 pm
| |
All three look noisy, I didn't check the ISO, but you have a noise problem which may due to High ISO.
The mountain lake has color noise which makes purple in the water.
The sunset is noisy in the sky which is the highest level of light and where there should be no noise
Forget the BW's all together
|
|
ovisovata83
Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Posts: 24
|
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 12:56 pm
| |
Thanks,
Got the idea and appreciate your input.
Just trying to understand the "magic formula" and polish my skills.
|
|
| |
|