| Author |
Message |
savagelioness
Joined: 06 Feb 2010
Posts: 38
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:27 am
| |
Hello again. Here are some new attempts, this time without the light box. What do you think?
| Description: |
| M 1/50 F5.6 ISO100 92mm WB cloudy |
|
| Filesize: |
153.4 KB |
| Viewed: |
1344 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
45.33 KB |
| Viewed: |
1344 Time(s) |

|
|
|
savagelioness
Joined: 06 Feb 2010
Posts: 38
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:29 am
| |
Ant this one.
| Description: |
| M 1/40 F6.3 ISO100 85mm; WB sunny |
|
| Filesize: |
132.27 KB |
| Viewed: |
1339 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
40.81 KB |
| Viewed: |
1339 Time(s) |

|
|
|
ruxpriencdiam

Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26321
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:36 am
| |
Crops show they are OOF (soft).
|
|
markrhiggins
Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 2012
Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:39 am
| |
Not sure what the concept is. The two pegs would be better with a white background. Looks a little soft in crop but no exif data. What were the settings and why would it sell if technically ok?
Second image, again same thoughts and why the rough cutout? What would it be used for?
|
|
jeffbanke

Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17469
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 10:19 am
| |
| markrhiggins wrote: | Not sure what the concept is. The two pegs would be better with a white background. Looks a little soft in crop but no exif data. What were the settings and why would it sell if technically ok?
Second image, again same thoughts and why the rough cutout? What would it be used for? |
Just to add to Barry and Mark's comments, - Soft, no attention to details and concept?
|
|
savagelioness
Joined: 06 Feb 2010
Posts: 38
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 10:26 am
| |
Didn't think much about the CV. Just trying to achieve technical improvement and improvized. I didn't use tripod this time. Thought the focus was ok, but now I see it isn't. Strange, the crop files looked much better before sumbitting them here.
I do have another series with a tripod. Will post them soon.
The exif data is in the description of both files.
|
|
markrhiggins
Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 2012
Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:07 am
| |
"The exif data is in the description of both files."
I can't see it using firefox plugin
|
|
cpaulfell

Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 2446
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:11 am
| |
| markrhiggins wrote: | "The exif data is in the description of both files."
I can't see it using firefox plugin |
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
50.9 KB |
| Viewed: |
1288 Time(s) |

|
|
|
ruxpriencdiam

Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26321
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:19 am
| |
This is what Mark means.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
37.35 KB |
| Viewed: |
1275 Time(s) |

|
|
|
jhuls

Joined: 02 Jan 2012
Posts: 1047
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:42 am
| |
You have a bit of camera distortion, notice the curve to all the images. What lens are you using. Camera distortion can be a big pain if you are trying to get things all strait especially when you are working with converging right angles.
|
|
rinder99

Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39282
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:45 pm
| |
I have no clue where your going with these? And yes they are OOF.
|
|
jeffbanke

Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17469
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 1:10 pm
| |
The backgrounds are also distracting, so before you try anything alse, get yourself a large white background, (a white sheet or foam board) to eliminate any distraction
|
|
markrhiggins
Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 2012
Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:54 pm
| |
get your lens closed down to f8, white background and tripod. All this will help but choose a commercial easy to understand subject.
|
|
savagelioness
Joined: 06 Feb 2010
Posts: 38
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:54 pm
| |
The Lense is Nikkor 18-105. Thought the background could be anything as long as it's blurred enough. Do I have to isolate the objects every time in postproduction? Please, give an example of suitable backgrounds that are not white-white.
Rinder, I am not working on concepts yet. Hope to come to that soon.
Here's another attempt. Please, ignore again the CV. Just picked some random objects at home. This time used a tripod and only the sun coming from the window at the back. Tried to add a fixture as well, but didn't like the result.
Is it sharp enough this time? I use a pure white background and table cover. They don't look enough white at the picture though. How do I process them in PS whithout losing details? Or maybe it's just a question of using the right WB.
Thanks for your time.
| Description: |
| Nikon D90, F 4.8; 1/6 sec.; 42 mm, no flash |
|
| Filesize: |
21.65 KB |
| Viewed: |
1199 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
12.04 KB |
| Viewed: |
1199 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
6.75 KB |
| Viewed: |
1199 Time(s) |

|
|
|
markrhiggins
Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 2012
Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:01 pm
| |
like I said close down the lens. Trying to blur background with opened up lens is giving narrow DOF and soft image (soft part of lens).
|
|
| |
|