Welcome, Anonymous (Profile, Private Messages)
Having trouble signing into the forums? Please [ logout ] and log back in.
 Log inLog in 
SEARCH:     » Advanced Search

Shutterstock Photographer Forum Forum Index : Critique / Tips / Tricks :
Rejected for composition

 
Post new topic    Reply to topic
Author Message
alastair27


Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 218

Post Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 3:02 pm     Reply with quote

These three were rejected for composition among a few other. Not the strongest images but would appreciate some critical comments about them. The first looks soft, so surprised this wasnt the reason given


bridge500.jpg
 Description:
Bridge at Nurnberg
 Filesize:  221.14 KB
 Viewed:  596 Time(s)

bridge500.jpg



bridge100.jpg
 Description:
Bridge at Nurnberg
 Filesize:  213.93 KB
 Viewed:  596 Time(s)

bridge100.jpg


alastair27


Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 218

Post Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 3:04 pm     Reply with quote

Second, again looks soft so why composition


fountain500.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  190.52 KB
 Viewed:  591 Time(s)

fountain500.jpg



fountain100.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  228.1 KB
 Viewed:  591 Time(s)

fountain100.jpg


alastair27


Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 218

Post Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 3:07 pm     Reply with quote

Third again composition not OOF


skyline500.jpg
 Description:
Nuremberg skyline
 Filesize:  215.1 KB
 Viewed:  585 Time(s)

skyline500.jpg



skyline100.jpg
 Description:
Nuremberg skyline
 Filesize:  223.93 KB
 Viewed:  585 Time(s)

skyline100.jpg


hhltdave5


Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24094
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com

Post Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 3:38 pm     Reply with quote

For the first one I would say that it is cropped a bit tight at the top. You have a little section of the tower in the left side cut off. Many shots like this when used in an ad would most likely have copy put on the top portion of the shot. With this there is little space for that.

For the fountain one the level of it looks all kaddy wampus. I can't tell if it is just the tower part that is leaning or if the whole shot is leaning due to an uneven horizon. Architectural photography often causes problems like this unless you are using a tilt/shift lens to control the perspective.

For the last shot the base line of the shot has problems because the windows are cut in half. It would be better if more of those front buildings were shown. If you are trying to show roof lines then you need a higher position where multiple roofs can be see throughout the image. The whole shot gives a look of being cropped too tightly.
jeffbanke


Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17468
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California

Post Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 4:20 pm     Reply with quote

I agree with Dave you are cropping too tight and #2 buildings in the background are leaning
Last one has little commercial value anyway
rinder99


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39256
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder

Post Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 4:21 pm     Reply with quote

It was because the reviewer saw composition first and hit that button. Question...if you knew they were soft, Why submit?
alastair27


Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 218

Post Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 12:06 am     Reply with quote

Anyway two of the series that were approved though the castle now looks definately OOF. More room for copy allowed

Have used the new script for the crop and it is clearly apparent what looks sharp on my laptop isnt sharp on the forum

Will take on board the advice about cropping too tight and allowing space for copy, thanks



castle500.jpg
 Description:
Castle at Nuremberg
 Filesize:  190.99 KB
 Viewed:  470 Time(s)

castle500.jpg



castle100.jpg
 Description:
Castle at Nuremberg
 Filesize:  202.58 KB
 Viewed:  470 Time(s)

castle100.jpg


alastair27


Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 218

Post Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 12:11 am     Reply with quote

Also approved, more space, and tower looks like its leaning back and soft in focus.

There was a thread recently about this problem about the variance in focus on the forum and how to resolve it, must look it up



tower500.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  122.8 KB
 Viewed:  461 Time(s)

tower500.jpg



tower100.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  210.62 KB
 Viewed:  461 Time(s)

tower100.jpg


jeffbanke


Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17468
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California

Post Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 12:21 am     Reply with quote

Just have to save at the highest quality
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT - 5 Hours

 


Shutterstock Forum for Contributors