| Author |
Message |
mmshaw

Joined: 16 Apr 2012
Posts: 17
|
Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 9:20 pm
| |
| copidosoma wrote: | This is what I was suggesting with my first post. Although, the image was underexposed so instead of adjusting the highlights with levels you should do it with exposure. That way the noise in the shadows won't be a problem.
This is 15 seconds in photoshop (likely similar in elements)
Levels adjustment so that your highlights start to clip then a bump in saturation and contrast.
Match colour does the same thing (not sure if that is in elements or not).
Oh, and don't forget to add some grapes next time ;) |
That does look so much better - even w/o the grapes! Thanks
|
|
mmshaw

Joined: 16 Apr 2012
Posts: 17
|
Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 9:23 pm
| |
[quote="jeffbanke"] | mmshaw wrote: | | hhltdave5 wrote: | | mmshaw wrote: | | If you are shooting RAW a touch of sharpening can be beneficial. |
I guess I thought that you were saying it HAD to be captured RAW to be sharpened. After re-reading it I see that that's not what you meant. Sorry to be so confusing. :) |
Maybe this will help: When you are save JPG in camera, the camera does some sharpening.
If you save RAW files, you need to do the sharpening to your taste in Photoshop or other software during post processing. |
OHHHHH…I see. Now it makes sense! Thanks!
|
|
smileus

Joined: 07 Oct 2008
Posts: 587
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 11:26 am
| |
I just wanted to show you where to go with the contrast so things get more interesting and less flat:
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
107.77 KB |
| Viewed: |
766 Time(s) |

|
|
|
rinder99

Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39254
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 12:53 pm
| |
Thats perfect.Some nice Plump clean red grapes and ya got a winner.
|
|
mmshaw

Joined: 16 Apr 2012
Posts: 17
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 3:26 pm
| |
Thanks everyone! I really appreciate all of your input and encouragement.
|
|
kenny123

Joined: 13 Aug 2005
Posts: 6079
Location: Masterton,Wairarapa, New Zealand
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 1:32 am
| |
To “POP”Color Using Lab mode
Here's how to "pop" the color using LAB (Lightness-Alpha-Beta; Not"Lab") color.
Image>mode>Lab color
Ctrl+ M -This brings up a grid-by holding the "Alt" button and clicking on the grid, you will get either large or small squares
Press "alt" and click on grid to get small squares.
Selecting Channel "a",Hold and drag cursor a short distance ( about one and a half squares-right to left) along top right corner of grid, and do the same to bottom left corner (left to right). Channel "a" allows you to fine tune reds and greens. Just adjust until the color is good for you.
Repeat the exercise using channel "b"-this fine tunes the blues and yellows.
When you have got it how you want: Click "OK"
Image>Mode>RGB color
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
48.02 KB |
| Viewed: |
692 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
56.07 KB |
| Viewed: |
692 Time(s) |

|
|
|
smileus

Joined: 07 Oct 2008
Posts: 587
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 6:01 am
| |
Kenny, we are looking at files with embedded profiles here. As soon as the picture is online it'll look different. I don't know about your monitor, but on mine your version is already oversaturated in parts and still too flat and dark. This is your version but with discarded color profile like all the images on SS:
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
52.87 KB |
| Viewed: |
674 Time(s) |

|
|
|
mmshaw

Joined: 16 Apr 2012
Posts: 17
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 8:03 am
| |
I don't know if you guys saw one of my earlier posts on this thread, but there I mentioned that I am pretty dumb about post-processing and the only software that I have is PSE9 and LR3. Some of what you guys are saying in greek to me! LOL
Kenny, when I looked for LAB color under images I didn't see it. Should I be looking somewhere else or could it be called something else in Elements?
Smileus, when I save a file in Elements I am given the opportunity to save the embedded color profile. Should I not do this? And, it seemed that you did more than just adjust the contrast to the original to get it to look so nice on the sample that you posted.
Hope I'm not a nuisance with all these questions. Thanks!
|
|
smileus

Joined: 07 Oct 2008
Posts: 587
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 8:49 am
| |
Your questions are quite fine. :)
I just meant to give a visual suggestion so you would see that your composition has more potential than it was perhaps obvious. The lighting of a shot can (and often should) become part of the composition. A nice play of lights and darks is something you should try to achieve right from the beginning: while shooting and also in post processing.
Unfortunately I can't just tell how I adjusted the contrast, it's too complex. Some of it I have saved as Photoshop actions so I can do it quite fast, but I still have to make decisions based on what I'm seeing: it wouldn't work if I'd just share some Photoshop actions. You could do a search on Google for midtone contrast, local contrast, soft glow effect or other selective contrast adjustments. Also manipulating the RGB channels on a layer copy and setting that layer's blending mode to luminosity is a nice method and I think I used that too. I know, just pushing up the contrast isn't going to do it all. Still, much of it can be done in Lightroom, where you just have to play around and become more experienced.
What Kenny said is used to gain more saturation if needed and it works better than just using hue-saturation in sRGB. Sorry, I don't have PS Elements and don't know where you have to look. In the "regular" Photoshop version it's in the menu under image>mode>LAB color. You could have added more vibrance or saturation in Lightroom, that's easier.
To come back to your question on the color profile: it's perfectly fine to save the file with the embedded profile. Shutterstock discards it on the previews it generates which is fine, nothing to worry about.
|
|
smileus

Joined: 07 Oct 2008
Posts: 587
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 9:19 am
| |
Okay, I think I can explain the RGB channels method which I mentioned, which alone can take you far, but it must be practiced and it's never the same on 2 different images. I hope Elements can do it, I don't know.
On your originally posted leaves make a layer copy. In PS I have a channels palette, where I can view the red, green and blue channel. Have a look at each channel by clicking on each, which brings up a black and white image. On your leaves the green channel looks quite flat. While it's selected, Go to image>apply image. In the dialog box set channel to red. What we are doing now is to blend the red channel which looks better with the boring green channel, and in this case I chose the blending mode "soft light". So, set "blending" to "soft light" and hit OK.
I would brighten up the black and white result now: go to image>adjustments>curves or perhaps image>adjustments>brightness/contrast and make the channel brighter until it looks good. Now click on the RGB channel, go back to the layers palette and set the layer's blending mode to luminosity (see image below). If it's still too dark, go to curves or brightness/contrast again and make the layer brighter until it looks right. There. Now you can flatten the image.
Now it needs more saturation, but otherwise it's got much better contrast. Good luck!
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
48.13 KB |
| Viewed: |
637 Time(s) |

|
Last edited by smileus on Thu May 10, 2012 10:46 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
ruxpriencdiam

Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26297
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 10:30 am
| |
I use Elements9 and it will do dam near every and anything you need it to do.
You can DL the new version of GIMP for free and it is very good as well.
I can also get you all kinds of links if needed here is one for PS tricks and tips.
http://submit.shutterstock.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=89878
|
|
mmshaw

Joined: 16 Apr 2012
Posts: 17
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 3:06 pm
| |
Smileus, I'm going to try your recipe as soon as I get home from work. Thank you for your the time to explain.
|
|
mmshaw

Joined: 16 Apr 2012
Posts: 17
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 4:07 pm
| |
Ruxpriencdiam
Thank you for the link. I followed it and there certainly was information that I found helpful. So far I have worked through the Classroom In A Book but figure that it's a never ending learning process. I would appreciate any links that you think would be of help.
And, do I need GIMP (whatever that is:) ) if I have these other programs?
I don't want to wear out my welcome, but as long as you guys keep answering, I'll probably keep asking!
|
|
copidosoma

Joined: 17 Nov 2009
Posts: 3804
Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 6:57 pm
| |
| mmshaw wrote: | Ruxpriencdiam
Thank you for the link. I followed it and there certainly was information that I found helpful. So far I have worked through the Classroom In A Book but figure that it's a never ending learning process. I would appreciate any links that you think would be of help.
And, do I need GIMP (whatever that is:) ) if I have these other programs?
I don't want to wear out my welcome, but as long as you guys keep answering, I'll probably keep asking! |
I think you will find that there are alot of people around here who will give you tonnes of good advice if you keep asking questions. The trick is that you have to put the work in to applying what you learn and make improvements.
Ask away.
|
|
rinder99

Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39254
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 8:23 pm
| |
And.......Applying it to your work and how you see it..Theres a lot of tech people here that go right past it.The very beginning is your eyes as a photographer.
|
|
| |
|