| Author |
Message |
alastair27
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 218
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:21 am
| |
Have been getting a lot of these rejections, can understand the poor lighting but not so sure about the noise and where to look for it. Often think I have been oversharpening! Also in the past have got rejections for shooting architecture straight on rather than at an angle.
Anyway have reworked the photo lessening the sharpening and replacing the sky, however the building still looks as if it was taken under an overcast sky.
Looking at it on the forum, both look totally OOF
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
209.39 KB |
| Viewed: |
960 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
161.79 KB |
| Viewed: |
960 Time(s) |

|
|
|
alastair27
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 218
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:23 am
| |
this is the reworked version - again OOF
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
196.45 KB |
| Viewed: |
961 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
178.54 KB |
| Viewed: |
961 Time(s) |

|
|
|
mscates176
Joined: 10 Feb 2011
Posts: 77
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:50 am
| |
A good place to look for noise is in any dark areas of an image.
|
|
semmickphoto

Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 6520
Location: Stuck between a shutter and a hard place
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 4:50 am
| |
first one has more contrast and looks better to me, i like the sky better in 2nd
|
|
nadger

Joined: 13 Sep 2009
Posts: 259
Location: God only knows
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 5:06 am
| |
Are you putting the images through HDR processes?
|
|
hhltdave5

Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24090
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 7:03 am
| |
The reworked version looks over exposed. I think one of your problems is that you are mucking around too much with post processing.
My first question is why are you doing all the sharpening? If you shot it in RAW then it can be of a help to do a tiny amount but I hope you are not doing it to try and get the shot in better focus because that is not going to happen.
Sharpening does not make an image sharper it just gives the illusion that it is. Also too much processing can create artifacts.
As mentioned noise is easily found in dark areas or often in places such as the sky.
|
|
alastair27
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 218
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:19 am
| |
have always done a little bit of sharpening, maybe a bad habit I've got into but have got away with it until recently.
Now trying to do only 20% sharp smartening and use manual focusing.
The first one did use HDR processing in Photomatrix to give the sky more impact. The original, as seen below, was dull as dishwater and therefore in need of a little post-processing
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
161.76 KB |
| Viewed: |
880 Time(s) |

|
|
|
semmickphoto

Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 6520
Location: Stuck between a shutter and a hard place
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:21 am
| |
HDR processing in Photomatix tends to create noisy photos. Sometime a lot of noise.
|
|
semmickphoto

Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 6520
Location: Stuck between a shutter and a hard place
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:28 am
| |
Simple adjustments in LR
Exposure, Clarity, vibrancy and contrast
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
221.49 KB |
| Viewed: |
868 Time(s) |

|
|
|
nadger

Joined: 13 Sep 2009
Posts: 259
Location: God only knows
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 9:46 am
| |
| semmickphoto wrote: | | HDR processing in Photomatix tends to create noisy photos. Sometime a lot of noise. |
+1
|
|
fotomak

Joined: 23 Jan 2009
Posts: 984
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:15 pm
| |
Your problem is in the lack of balance between the clouds and the building ( front ). You need more light in the front, and this will wash out the clouds. I would replace the clouds with blue sky which nicely complements the building and the path. You can do this or if you have a chance go back and shoot at different light conditions.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
183.89 KB |
| Viewed: |
818 Time(s) |

|
|
|
rinder99

Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39238
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:16 pm
| |
+1000 Nice job.
|
|
fotomak

Joined: 23 Jan 2009
Posts: 984
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:30 pm
| |
Thank you sir :)
|
|
semmickphoto

Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 6520
Location: Stuck between a shutter and a hard place
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:32 pm
| |
There's floating leaves now
|
|
fotomak

Joined: 23 Jan 2009
Posts: 984
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2012 12:37 pm
| |
It was just a quick fix to serve as an example.
|
|
| |
|