| Author |
Message |
alastair27
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 218
|
Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2012 12:33 pm
|  |
This was rejected for composition,which was an HDR attempt to light into the tree shadows. All it did was to produce a lot of noise in the clouds and give a strange appearence to the bushes. Also its OOF, so is the composition the problem?
Is it worth resubmitting the original without the HDR and with the black silhouette of the trees
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
120.42 KB |
| Viewed: |
648 Time(s) |
|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
129.29 KB |
| Viewed: |
648 Time(s) |
|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
178.49 KB |
| Viewed: |
648 Time(s) |
|
|
|
jeffbanke
Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17463
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:17 pm
| |
Unfortunately there is not much of interest, except the clouds and reflection. This might have been accepted 5 years ago, but not today, you need some forground interest, perhaps the Swedish bikini swim team :-)
BTW, you also have some CA in the form of fringing, cyan in the lower part of the image and magenta in the boundary of the sky and horizon
|
|
rinder99
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39161
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2012 6:24 pm
| |
+1.If you have any noise in One Image and do multiple Images you triple the noise.
|
|
semmickphoto
Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 6471
Location: Stuck between a shutter and a hard place
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 3:08 am
| |
| rinder99 wrote: | | +1.If you have any noise in One Image and do multiple Images you triple the noise. |
Actually, didnt someone do an extensive test with layers to show that noise actually reduces because its never in the same place? If you use different shots. I think that thread was started when I just joined here 5 months ago.
|
|
| |
|
Log in
