| Author |
Message |
ansku
Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 147
Location: Finland
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 10:13 am
|  |
Thanks for the tips!! That wine glass shot is amazing, by the way...
And Dave, once again it's so great how you take the time to give such thorough and detailed advice!!! Because you're so great in teaching: I promise to try to change things up a bit and try new angles! I think I've been so busy just trying to build my portfolio, get the numbers up and FAST, that I've given too little time for learning...
|
|
hhltdave5
Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24055
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 11:50 am
| |
| ansku wrote: | Thanks for the tips!! That wine glass shot is amazing, by the way...
And Dave, once again it's so great how you take the time to give such thorough and detailed advice!!! Because you're so great in teaching: I promise to try to change things up a bit and try new angles! I think I've been so busy just trying to build my portfolio, get the numbers up and FAST, that I've given too little time for learning... |
Happy to be of some help. If you ever have any other questions don't hesitate to ask.
|
|
jutia
Joined: 15 Apr 2012
Posts: 290
Location: Dominican Republic
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 3:03 pm
| |
| ansku wrote: | Thanks for the tips!! That wine glass shot is amazing, by the way...
And Dave, once again it's so great how you take the time to give such thorough and detailed advice!!! Because you're so great in teaching: I promise to try to change things up a bit and try new angles! I think I've been so busy just trying to build my portfolio, get the numbers up and FAST, that I've given too little time for learning... |
Regards
I have doubts with relation to the reflections of light on some of my shots and I would like to know if I can post it here to not open another post.
|
|
ansku
Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 147
Location: Finland
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 3:07 pm
| |
Sure, go ahead! :-)
|
|
jutia
Joined: 15 Apr 2012
Posts: 290
Location: Dominican Republic
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 5:40 pm
| |
| ansku wrote: | | Sure, go ahead! :-) |
Ok,thank you very much,
I mean the reflection of the left side of this shot, I feel burned out or is passable?
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
144.83 KB |
| Viewed: |
609 Time(s) |
|
|
|
rinder99
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39131
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 7:56 pm
| |
The lighting in general is Poor my friend. I would reshoot.
|
|
ruxpriencdiam
Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26152
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
|
jeffbanke
Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17461
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 8:31 pm
| |
| rinder99 wrote: | | The lighting in general is Poor my friend. I would reshoot. |
Agree you can only take this so far in PS
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
156.72 KB |
| Viewed: |
579 Time(s) |
|
|
|
jutia
Joined: 15 Apr 2012
Posts: 290
Location: Dominican Republic
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 9:51 pm
| |
| rinder99 wrote: | | The lighting in general is Poor my friend. I would reshoot. |
thank you very much
The original shot has much more light, and I underexposure trying to hide the high reflection of the lights in the glass, but takes his advice and makes the shot again.
here the new version, with better control of lighting and another angle
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
172.41 KB |
| Viewed: |
558 Time(s) |
|
|
|
hhltdave5
Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24055
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 11:10 pm
| |
| jutia wrote: | | rinder99 wrote: | | The lighting in general is Poor my friend. I would reshoot. |
thank you very much
The original shot has much more light, and I underexposure trying to hide the high reflection of the lights in the glass, but takes his advice and makes the shot again.
here the new version, with better control of lighting and another angle |
It is generally under exposed. Is that a sea shell in the glass? Watch the use of some greens in food work. It can be an unappetizing color. If those are blueberries in the glass I would have put a few more in. Also to me the focus is not quite there.
|
|
rinder99
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39131
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 12:45 am
| |
Don't like the green at all. Unappealing for food.
|
|
jutia
Joined: 15 Apr 2012
Posts: 290
Location: Dominican Republic
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 8:35 am
| |
| hhltdave5 wrote: | | jutia wrote: | | rinder99 wrote: | | The lighting in general is Poor my friend. I would reshoot. |
thank you very much
The original shot has much more light, and I underexposure trying to hide the high reflection of the lights in the glass, but takes his advice and makes the shot again.
here the new version, with better control of lighting and another angle |
It is generally under exposed. Is that a sea shell in the glass? Watch the use of some greens in food work. It can be an unappetizing color. If those are blueberries in the glass I would have put a few more in. Also to me the focus is not quite there. |
is an edible candy shell-shaped, in relation to the approach in this type of shot is necessary that the entire area of the glass is in focus?.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
184.18 KB |
| Viewed: |
497 Time(s) |
|
Last edited by jutia on Sat Aug 04, 2012 8:47 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
jutia
Joined: 15 Apr 2012
Posts: 290
Location: Dominican Republic
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 8:38 am
| |
| rinder99 wrote: | | Don't like the green at all. Unappealing for food. |
Ok, I will make other shots with proving other colors
|
|
hhltdave5
Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24055
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 8:56 am
| |
| jutia wrote: | | hhltdave5 wrote: | | jutia wrote: | | rinder99 wrote: | | The lighting in general is Poor my friend. I would reshoot. |
thank you very much
The original shot has much more light, and I underexposure trying to hide the high reflection of the lights in the glass, but takes his advice and makes the shot again.
here the new version, with better control of lighting and another angle |
It is generally under exposed. Is that a sea shell in the glass? Watch the use of some greens in food work. It can be an unappetizing color. If those are blueberries in the glass I would have put a few more in. Also to me the focus is not quite there. |
is an edible candy shell-shaped, in relation to the approach in this type of shot is necessary that the entire area of the glass is in focus?. |
The whole thing doesn't have to be in focus as long as you have some important point to be in tack sharp focus. Again, use of DOF helps draw the eye to a specific area and the OOF section must not overwhelm the rest of the image.
|
|
| |
|
Log in
