| Author |
Message |
www.Lucidology.com
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 11
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:14 pm
|  |
..
Last edited by www.Lucidology.com on Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:21 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
greenfield54
Joined: 21 Jun 2009
Posts: 2620
Location: Philippines
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 6:47 pm
| |
We prefer images for critique to be posted directly to SS with 100% crops. Please refer to the instructions at the top of the page of the critique forum.
|
|
www.Lucidology.com
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 11
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 7:12 pm
| |
..
Last edited by www.Lucidology.com on Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:22 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
ruxpriencdiam
Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26321
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
|
www.Lucidology.com
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 11
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 8:23 pm
| |
..
Last edited by www.Lucidology.com on Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:22 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
jeffbanke
Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17469
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 8:46 pm
| |
Bump
|
|
rinder99
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39282
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 12:47 am
| |
Im not downloading an Image to look at it. pls post properly.
|
|
jmci
Joined: 29 Oct 2006
Posts: 2385
Location: Northern Ireland
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 4:15 am
| |
In 1.jpg the pig looks ok to me - you've managed to show the contours, which must have been difficult. Unfortunately, there are clipped highlights all over the coins (they may not be pure white, but they're blown enough to lose all definition).
The coins are a bit better in 2.jpg, although the shadows might be a little too dark, but the pig looks very flat and needs more contrast to show the shape.
Apart from lighting, both photos would probably have been rejected for composition anyway, because of the tight crop that cuts off the top of the pig.
I'm coming to the rescue because you seem to be having trouble posting the pics for critique - next time, try to follow the instructions, before the angry villagers arrive with their pitchforks! (That's a private forum joke ;))
|
|
hhltdave5
Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24100
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 7:59 am
| |
I think the problem you are having with posting the images correctly is that you are not resizing them correctly. As the instructions indicate make sure they are less than 500 pixels on the longest side and less than 247k.
|
|
semmickphoto
Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 6544
Location: Stuck between a shutter and a hard place
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 9:00 am
| |
Seriously, that sticky needs to be anihalated and a new sticky with 2 or 3 clear instructions needs to be posted and it needs to be locked down for comments.
|
|
Mike Price
Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 2920
Location: South Wales
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 9:21 am
| |
| semmickphoto wrote: | | Seriously, that sticky needs to be anihalated and a new sticky with 2 or 3 clear instructions needs to be posted and it needs to be locked down for comments. |
I agree, it is just too complicated. You do not need to zoom in too 100%, just select a section less than 500px and your done 500px is 500px regardless of how much you zoom the image. The only reason for zooming to 100% is to see if it is in focus, nothing to do with cropping.
Mike
|
|
rinder99
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39282
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:36 am
| |
| semmickphoto wrote: | | Seriously, that sticky needs to be anihalated and a new sticky with 2 or 3 clear instructions needs to be posted and it needs to be locked down for comments. |
People don't read them anyway, We have had a ton of stickys over the years.Needs to look like this.Yours was 4608 longest side. needs to be under 500.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
206.78 KB |
| Viewed: |
868 Time(s) |
|
Last edited by rinder99 on Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:39 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
jeffbanke
Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17469
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:38 am
| |
To show your full image, simply go to "Image Size: resize the longest side to 500 Pix.
The fastest way I have found to show a 100% image that is 500x500, is to make your self an image with a white background that is 500x500 pixels, and save it calling it "500x500 template".
(keep it somewhere that is easy to get to, like your desktop)
Open this template
Open any other image > Select "CTRL A" > "CTRL C"
(this selects ALL, and copies for those who don't use the keyboard)
Switch back to the template and use "CTRL V" (Paste)
You will see part of your image pasted into the 500x500 template, use the "ove tool" to select which part of the image you want to show.
SAVE AS (don't forget to rename)
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
123.81 KB |
| Viewed: |
859 Time(s) |
|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
160.04 KB |
| Viewed: |
872 Time(s) |
|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
193.96 KB |
| Viewed: |
872 Time(s) |
|
|
|
www.Lucidology.com
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 11
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 5:38 pm
| |
..
Last edited by www.Lucidology.com on Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:22 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
ruxpriencdiam
Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26321
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 5:42 pm
| |
| www.Lucidology.com wrote: | Thanks for everyone's help.
Is this image an improvement? I've cropped out the coins in the foreground that had ugly direct reflections and mapped the colors to blue in order to make the remaining reflections appear less direct. |
Lighting and WB whoa!
|
|
| |
|
Log in
