| Author |
Message |
screenfx

Joined: 30 Mar 2005
Posts: 171
Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2005 11:26 am
| |
The most popular vector editing software is of course the most expensive. They are Adobe Illustrator, Macromedia Freehand, and Corel Draw |
|
RosaMystica7
Joined: 17 Mar 2005
Posts: 267
Location: New York
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 1:27 pm
| |
Why do all the vectors seem to have multiple images in the same vector? Wouldn't it make sense to have each image seperate, so you get paid for each one downloaded? |
|
screenfx

Joined: 30 Mar 2005
Posts: 171
Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 6:10 pm
| |
If subscribers are limited to 25 downloads a day they're more likely to download a sheet of images rather than just one. |
|
StuartE

Joined: 28 Nov 2004
Posts: 1606
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2005 11:37 pm
| |
| RosaMystica7 wrote: | | Why do all the vectors seem to have multiple images in the same vector? Wouldn't it make sense to have each image seperate, so you get paid for each one downloaded? |
That's the law of marketing - if your street sign sells well, then someone who's offering two vectorised images of street signs for the same money will probably sell better... then 4, then 10, then a dozen... because vectors can be rescaled up and down at will, there isn't any real reason to take an individual sign when you can get a page full... value for money for the buyer, sure... slug to the hip pocket of the poster? I'd assume so - after all, if you have 12 signs, and sell them all in one image 10 times, you've just made $2.30 - if they were in say groups of 4, and people like them, you'd make $6.90... but it looks like that's the way of vectors... micro, micro stock... :-)
Cheers,
Stuart |
|
zastavkin

Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 359
Location: Stock Photographers Club
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2005 4:01 am
| |
Maybe it needs an informal agreement between the artists to place no more than 5 objects on the sheet? |
|
Heidi Hart

Joined: 02 Mar 2005
Posts: 145
Location: Fayetteville, NC
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2005 4:38 am
| |
| StuartE wrote: | | Yeah yeah, now just wait for the "I'm losing sales to those vector people..." posts next... :-) |
Stuart you were reading my mind. Gosh darn it, I'm loosing sales to those vector people!! :)
Now to go play with some vectors and figure all this out. If only the whole saving them would stop giving me a headache though. |
|
screenfx

Joined: 30 Mar 2005
Posts: 171
Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2005 5:35 am
| |
I'm going to try for quality rather than quantity, and see if it makes a difference. If it doesn't then I'm just not interested. It would bore me to tears to draw a bunch of icons. |
|
JaZilla
Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 99
Location: Appalachia
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2005 10:10 pm
| |
I just had my first vector approved, and in less than 24 hours it was downloaded. It's a single image:
http://www.shutterstock.com/pic.mhtml?id=269071
I may do related multiples, but probably not more than 3 or 4 per page. |
|
concretedonkey
Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 28
Location: canada
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 8:18 pm
| |
well i am one of those guys that have lots of images in my 1 vector. And i went from a 6 download a day average to a 20 a day average with only 60 images in my portfolio. So i will continue to offer images with a large value for the money. Godda give the people what they want.
My gallery http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery.mhtml?id=4700 |
|
rodehi

Joined: 11 Jan 2005
Posts: 1914
Location: British Columbia Canada
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 8:22 pm
| |
I will be experimenting with vectors as soon as I get a bigger hard drive....since I dont make much of a photographer judging by my rejection rate...lol..soon,very soon......Ron |
|
GeneralE
Joined: 22 Oct 2004
Posts: 374
Location: Oakland, California
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 9:08 pm
| |
| rodehi wrote: | | I will be experimenting with vectors as soon as I get a bigger hard drive.... |
For vectors you can probably get away with a smaller hard drive ... : ) |
|
StuartE

Joined: 28 Nov 2004
Posts: 1606
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 9:15 pm
| |
| concretedonkey wrote: | well i am one of those guys that have lots of images in my 1 vector. And i went from a 6 download a day average to a 20 a day average with only 60 images in my portfolio. So i will continue to offer images with a large value for the money. Godda give the people what they want.
My gallery http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery.mhtml?id=4700 |
Wow - that much of an increase... maybe the vectors really are sapping the sales... I'm only two off my monthly average, but I'm not seeing the big 20-30 dl days that make up for any low days, either... perhaps that's why some photo only photographers are seeing better sales elsewhere now, sales are still growing all around, but the cut for photos here IS dropping??
Cheers,
Stuart |
|
Yali

Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 94
Location: Taiwan
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 11:07 pm
| |
Have any of the linux fellow travellers here tried autotrace, which automatically traces a bitmap and converts it to a vector. I tried it on some simple b/w outline type photos and it seems to work quite well. You can get a GUI frontend for it called Frontline. Here is a simple sample
http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-277397.html
I've really never done anything with vectors before, so I don't even know if stuff like that would sell.
Cheers,
Yali |
|
bluliq
Joined: 12 Apr 2005
Posts: 337
|
Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 2:26 am
| |
yali: i work with vectors for the 3,5 years
that is a good trace result but you have to corect the result in lower part of the foot
looking kind of strage.
also look kind of strage form of the head.
try to keep the initial shapes of objects |
|
Yali

Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 94
Location: Taiwan
|
Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 6:39 am
| |
| bluliq wrote: | yali: i work with vectors for the 3,5 years
that is a good trace result but you have to corect the result in lower part of the foot
looking kind of strage.
also look kind of strage form of the head.
try to keep the initial shapes of objects |
thank you for your encouragement, any credit goes to autotrace, I have no idea about vectors, just loaded my image and pushed the trace button.
Cheers,
Yali |
|
| |
|