| Author |
Message |
natse

Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 138
Location: www.freewebs.com/natse
|
|
varius

Joined: 19 Mar 2006
Posts: 5574
Location: Bietigheim - Bissingen, Germany
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 3:30 pm
| |
Contact support, if you havn't already. |
|
natse

Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 138
Location: www.freewebs.com/natse
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:00 pm
| |
I reckon it could be interesting to learn exactly what is Shutterstock's policy on people who steal images like that... |
|
crashoran
Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Posts: 203
Location: Austin, Tx
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 4:58 pm
| |
If you can't prove it's yours, then they permanently ban you. The copier might have made his version on his own, but each stroke is in the exact same place |
|
Photoshow

Joined: 05 Nov 2004
Posts: 5506
Location: Somewhere between where I'm going and where I've been
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 10:35 pm
| |
bada bump, bump, bump, bump another one bites the dust! |
|
kenny123

Joined: 13 Aug 2005
Posts: 5580
Location: Masterton,Wairarapa, New Zealand
|
Posted: Sat Dec 29, 2007 11:47 pm
| |
Best way to be able to prove it's yours: submit a cropped version for review and sale, keep full area version, so you can show where the image was cropped from. Regards, Ken |
|
rinder99

Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 33775
Location: Stock,food,portrait books www.rindersmithphotography.com
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 12:47 am
| |
| Photoshow wrote: | | bada bump, bump, bump, bump another one bites the dust! |
Yes Sir!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
varius

Joined: 19 Mar 2006
Posts: 5574
Location: Bietigheim - Bissingen, Germany
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 4:14 am
| |
Just for the record: I've sent SethO a link to this thread. I expect he did get many such PMs, but since noone said he's send one, I thought better send one more in case noone did... |
|
luisfico

Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 459
Location: Looking for Hamster Huey and the Gooey Kablooie
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 7:30 am
| |
| kenny123 wrote: | | Best way to be able to prove it's yours: submit a cropped version for review and sale, keep full area version, so you can show where the image was cropped from. Regards, Ken |
What a clever idea, in the shots that you actually have detail outside the crop area, i.e. not in the white background isolated images, for exameple...
I've heard they do that with paintings, not showing the whole canvas to the public in museums, but I could be wrong.
Regards. |
|
mtrebbin

Joined: 05 Jul 2007
Posts: 947
Location: Location: Locaton:
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 8:44 am
| |
That's a very good idea to crop the vectors! If you have unprocessed photos shot in RAW, prooving you're the owner should be no problem.
my2ct ;)
Martin |
|
medveh

Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Posts: 1824
Location: Transylvania
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:05 am
| |
I don't get why people do anything like that... They risk all the profit they could have gotten without stealing. |
|
pharm

Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 9338
Location: Never quite sure
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:28 am
| |
| medveh wrote: | | I don't get why people do anything like that... |
Laziness, stupidity, poor parenting. |
|
dapoopta

Joined: 28 Nov 2007
Posts: 3061
Location: 10,000 shutter clicks away from PRO
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 10:54 am
| |
How do you find things like this? There are so many images out there, how would you know if you stuff got stolen? |
|
sammyc

Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 1482
Location: Portsmouth UK / Winchester UK
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 11:15 am
| |
Have you considered that it may be made by a with a series of filters or tools, or perhaps even a tutorial program. There is a "small" likelyhood that this wasn't a straight ripoff |
|
natse

Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Posts: 138
Location: www.freewebs.com/natse
|
Posted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 1:35 pm
| |
[quote="sammyc"]Have you considered that it may be made by a with a series of filters or tools, or perhaps even a tutorial program. There is a "small" likelyhood that this wasn't a straight ripoff[/quote]
I do agree, of course. This original image is one of the Top 50 Ever, so it's quite easy to find. Maybe it's just pure coinsidence that the 2 images seem pretty much the same, except the colours and the fact that the 1st is a vector. I honestly would have thought that this sort of similarity shouldn't be allowed. But it seems that maybe it is ok, because the user wasn't banned, both images are active. Well maybe that's the way to go- look up Top 50, create the same image, change colous and off you go. By the way , the user in question also has a few more images in his port made using other people's images.
1: OnFocus
http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-3370089-floral-background.html
2.
http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-7981870-vector-image.html
Much the same , except for colour, and the 2nd been turned around. Another coinsidence?
Well, perhaps, it is non of my business anyhow, it is just that i feel that had someone been so CLOSELY 'inspired' by my own designs, i would have been less than amused.And afterall it is just wrong for people to think that it's OK to copy...ok, i shut up |
|
| |
|