| Author |
Message |
Captured Nuance
Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Posts: 1609
Location: So Cal
|
Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 4:01 pm
|  |
| Forgiss wrote: | | That mr Rinder... is a kickass avatar! |
Thats because he took my body and put his head on there LOL
Gordo |
|
rinder99
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 19020
Location: Books and Class Info, www.rindersmithphotography.com or, www.rinderart.com
|
|
Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 4:05 pm
| |
| Forgiss wrote: | | That mr Rinder... is a kickass avatar! |
Ya, thanks Been Working out like an animal Does having a 6 pack mean Im suppossed to drink a 6 pack a day? I hope so. LOL |
|
Captured Nuance
Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Posts: 1609
Location: So Cal
|
|
Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 4:09 pm
| |
| rinder99 wrote: | | Forgiss wrote: | | That mr Rinder... is a kickass avatar! |
Ya, thanks Been Working out like an animal Does having a 6 pack mean Im suppossed to drink a 6 pack a day? I hope so. LOL |
Oh God now I am really scared to have a day with Mr Rinder....aaaahhhhhhh |
|
Forgiss
Joined: 16 Mar 2005
Posts: 4852
Location: For videos of our shoots: http://forgiss.libsyn.com
|
|
Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 4:16 pm
| |
| rinder99 wrote: |
Ya, thanks Been Working out like an animal Does having a 6 pack mean Im suppossed to drink a 6 pack a day? I hope so. LOL |
I have a sixpack as well... and like a good sixpack I keep it in this here padded cooler! |
|
rinder99
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 19020
Location: Books and Class Info, www.rindersmithphotography.com or, www.rinderart.com
|
|
Posted: Thu May 08, 2008 4:22 pm
| |
| Forgiss wrote: | | rinder99 wrote: |
Ya, thanks Been Working out like an animal Does having a 6 pack mean Im suppossed to drink a 6 pack a day? I hope so. LOL |
I have a sixpack as well... and like a good sixpack I keep it in this here padded cooler! |
HA!!!!! |
|
riffmax
Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 2877
Location: Florida, USA
|
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 11:51 am
| |
| rinder99 wrote: | | mnoor wrote: | Try reducing the photo size in PS but within the minimum requirement of submission size.
It will help reduce noise on your photo. |
Ya a good option , But Not the correct option in the long run. You want EL's?????? I live on them. Go ahead shoot noisy images you can fix by down sizing. What do you have? Nothing but small images with noise. Thats Bullshit!!!.sorry Think about the big picture here. Folks with that way of thinking is killing this site............Period. |
So, you're saying that NOT downsizing will increase the possibility of any image being attractive for an EL sale?
I've been pretty plain about my P&S - a nice camera for what it is, but notorious for noise. So, I make a point of downsizing to take advantage of every option I have to reduce the noise.
Perhaps, it would behoove me to submit the fullsized version first in case is DOES pass muster - then submit a downsized version if it does NOT pass (I mean, for noise issues).
But then, if I re-save the larger file once I have downsized it, don't I lose some resolution by doing a second save? So, then the option would be to work 2 seperate versions of the file and resize one before saving to have on-hand, right?
Well, there are some cases where that wouldn't increase the work flow too badly, but many where it would. So which way does the scale tip? Is it possible that re-saving does not compromise the resolution as much as down-sizing helps it? |
|
magnum
Joined: 24 Feb 2008
Posts: 117
|
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 12:10 pm
| |
Is Mr Rinder maybe sponsored by ,or wants to be sponored by Nikon:)
Either way, you make me wanna have one now! |
|
rinder99
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 19020
Location: Books and Class Info, www.rindersmithphotography.com or, www.rinderart.com
|
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 12:26 pm
| |
| riffmax wrote: | | rinder99 wrote: | | mnoor wrote: | Try reducing the photo size in PS but within the minimum requirement of submission size.
It will help reduce noise on your photo. |
Ya a good option , But Not the correct option in the long run. You want EL's?????? I live on them. Go ahead shoot noisy images you can fix by down sizing. What do you have? Nothing but small images with noise. Thats Bullshit!!!.sorry Think about the big picture here. Folks with that way of thinking is killing this site............Period. |
So, you're saying that NOT downsizing will increase the possibility of any image being attractive for an EL sale?
I've been pretty plain about my P&S - a nice camera for what it is, but notorious for noise. So, I make a point of downsizing to take advantage of every option I have to reduce the noise.
Perhaps, it would behoove me to submit the fullsized version first in case is DOES pass muster - then submit a downsized version if it does NOT pass (I mean, for noise issues).
But then, if I re-save the larger file once I have downsized it, don't I lose some resolution by doing a second save? So, then the option would be to work 2 seperate versions of the file and resize one before saving to have on-hand, right?
Well, there are some cases where that wouldn't increase the work flow too badly, but many where it would. So which way does the scale tip? Is it possible that re-saving does not compromise the resolution as much as down-sizing helps it? |
Perry, I think you should set a time to call me. To much to type. e-mail me and we'll set a time.
rinderart@aol.com |
|
rinder99
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 19020
Location: Books and Class Info, www.rindersmithphotography.com or, www.rinderart.com
|
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 12:27 pm
| |
| magnum wrote: | Is Mr Rinder maybe sponsored by ,or wants to be sponored by Nikon:)
Either way, you make me wanna have one now! |
Both.been with nikon and hasselblad for at least 45 years. |
|
riffmax
Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 2877
Location: Florida, USA
|
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 1:58 pm
| |
Thanks Laurin! |
|
rinder99
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 19020
Location: Books and Class Info, www.rindersmithphotography.com or, www.rinderart.com
|
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 2:28 pm
| |
| riffmax wrote: | | Thanks Laurin! |
Anytime Girl. |
|
| |
|
Log in
