Welcome, Anonymous (Profile, Private Messages)
Having trouble signing into the forums? Please [ logout ] and log back in.
 Log inLog in 
SEARCH:     » Advanced Search

Shutterstock Photographer Forum Forum Index : Critique / Tips / Tricks :
Critique on first batch not approved

 
Post new topic    Reply to topic
Author Message
izanette


Joined: 30 Jan 2008
Posts: 4

Post Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 7:24 am     Reply with quote

Hi,

Have just had my first batch of pictures not approved :(
Anyway, in a way to move forward, I would like to hear from you a bit of more details about why these 3 pictures weren't approved and what can I do to improve them:

Not approved because of composition:
1.

crop 100%


Not approved because poor lighting:
2.

crop 100%


3.

crop 100%


Also, I had some pictures that had the comment "7 of 10 must be approved". Reading the forums, I learnt that those pictures would have been accepted if at most three weren't rejected.
Is there any problem to re-submit these pictures that would have been accepted next time?

Regards,

IZ
kenny123


Joined: 13 Aug 2005
Posts: 2603
Location: Masterton, New Zealand

Post Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 7:34 am     Reply with quote

#1. Cropped too tight

#2. Unnatural reflections

#3. Not in focus-too dark

not a good idea to leave watermarks or copyright notices on you images

As for your other question,they ask that you present ten totally new images next time.

regards, ken
izanette


Joined: 30 Jan 2008
Posts: 4

Post Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:02 am     Reply with quote

Thanks for your comments Ken!

I just didn't understand the comment about unnatural reflections on the #2 picture. I used a large light box to soften the light and I think it gave these reflections. Is this too bad?

IZ
kenny123


Joined: 13 Aug 2005
Posts: 2603
Location: Masterton, New Zealand

Post Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 3:01 pm     Reply with quote

izanette wrote:
Thanks for your comments Ken!

I just didn't understand the comment about unnatural reflections on the #2 picture. I used a large light box to soften the light and I think it gave these reflections. Is this too bad?

IZ


Unless you really understand lighting,and know what you are doing,a light tent ( a lightbox is used for viewing slides)will give you problems-better to keep it simple-just use a window on the side of the house opposite direct sun,and use diffusers,reflectors or mirrors to get the effect you want. Regards, Ken
izanette


Joined: 30 Jan 2008
Posts: 4

Post Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 4:21 pm     Reply with quote

kenny123 wrote:
...a light tent ( a lightbox is used for viewing slides)
...


Sorry, I meant a softbox like this one.

Anyway, I still can't see anything wrong with the light of this photo. I think that these reflections will show with almost any kind of light that I use because of the oil in the food. I can use a small source of light to make the specular light very small. But this will have the side effect of creating harsh shadows. I'm sure a window will create the same kind of reflection.

Regards,

IZ
hhltdave5


Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 6683
Location: Fox Lake, Illinois, USA

Post Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:38 pm     Reply with quote

I don't think the lighting in the food shot is that far off. I think a touch of brightening to make the colors pop some will do it.

The problem sometimes comes up where one soft light source can give a food shot a one dimensional look to it and that can result in somewhat of a flat light. For this shot I would try some back/side lighting with a fill or reflector opposite.

There is nothing wrong with reflections being made by the use of oil or other liquid as long as they don't get blown out or take over the entire image. I shoot for those reflections quite a bit and they can enhance a food shot if done properly.

All in all I don't think you were that far off with the shot.
kenny123


Joined: 13 Aug 2005
Posts: 2603
Location: Masterton, New Zealand

Post Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:51 pm     Reply with quote

izanette wrote:
kenny123 wrote:
...a light tent ( a lightbox is used for viewing slides)
...


Sorry, I meant a softbox like this one.

Anyway, I still can't see anything wrong with the light of this photo. I think that these reflections will show with almost any kind of light that I use because of the oil in the food. I can use a small source of light to make the specular light very small. But this will have the side effect of creating harsh shadows. I'm sure a window will create the same kind of reflection.

Regards,

IZ


A lot of pro's use a second diffuser (scrim) on a frame between softbox and subject to cut reflections-with the window method you could cover window with a plain shower curtain. Regards, Ken
izanette


Joined: 30 Jan 2008
Posts: 4

Post Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 2:09 pm     Reply with quote

Thanks Ken and Dave for critique and the tips. Will try them next time I shot food.

Dave, looked at your gallery and your food photos are awesome!

Regards,

IZ
hhltdave5


Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 6683
Location: Fox Lake, Illinois, USA

Post Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 2:34 pm     Reply with quote

izanette wrote:
Thanks Ken and Dave for critique and the tips. Will try them next time I shot food.

Dave, looked at your gallery and your food photos are awesome!

Regards,

IZ


Why thank you IZ. Always nice to hear comments like that.
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT - 5 Hours

 


Shutterstock Forum for Submitters