| Author |
Message |
amvasey
Joined: 14 Nov 2006
Posts: 114
Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:21 am
| |
I see some wonderful photos on SS that isolate a wine or other type of drinking glass on white. Anybody willing to give me some clues? I can't seem to get the background white enough when I am taking the shot without the glass disappearing. If I try to whiten up the background in photoshop the glass also disappears. If I exclude the glass itself from the whitening process then the background looks white but the glass looks dirty gray. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Audrey
|
|
rinder99

Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39223
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:46 am
| |
Can be done but Difficult without Many exposure tricks and experience in product Photography. Glassware has Many Issues to deal with. And very tough to type an answer without knowing the type of Light your using, Background material, Etc,Etc.sorry.subject and Background must be lit differently.
|
|
amvasey
Joined: 14 Nov 2006
Posts: 114
Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 2:55 pm
| |
Hi Rinder, I should have known that you would be one of the first to respond to my question. I have found your advise to be very helpful in the past so now I am all ears. I am using a cubelite isolation cube and 500 watt hot lights. I have moved the lights to the sides, front and back (backlight), to the top, you name it anywhere I could try them. I am open to trying just about anything. I'll take the glass out of the cube if that works better. I don't have a lot of fancy equipment. So please help steer me in the right direction.
|
|
mauijon

Joined: 02 Mar 2005
Posts: 4279
Location: Maui, Hawaii
|
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:35 pm
| |
Like Laurin says...difficult.
You might try lighting from the bottom and make the BG black or a color.
|
|
graphicphoto

Joined: 23 Oct 2006
Posts: 2452
Location: In your brain, stealing your ideas!
|
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 11:25 pm
| |
Using a LOT of diffused light is a good idea with glass so you don't get blown highlights or glare. Try setting up a sheet on either side using some sort of stands and lighting through those and then setting up a back light if you have that much lighting. It will be hit and miss until you nail it since none of us can actually see what you are shooting.
Remember the angle of incidence and the angle of reflectance with the light in the back. Do NOT point it right at the camera. It has to be below, above or to the side so you don't get lens flare. That will probably be the tricky part but in my opinion and experience the back light is necessary. I would use a snoot.
Good luck. I drew you a diagram to help.
| Description: |
|
 Download |
| Filename: |
lights.jpg |
| Filesize: |
54.83 KB |
| Downloaded: |
376 Time(s) |
|
|
pharm

Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 9406
Location: Never quite sure
|
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 1:45 pm
| |
Shot RAW and used several different exposures combined. The rim kept blowing out when the rest was exposed properly so I just masked in the rim from a separate (darker) exposure.
|
|
davidcrehner

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 4839
|
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 10:13 pm
| |
| pharm wrote: | Shot RAW and used several different exposures combined. The rim kept blowing out when the rest was exposed properly so I just masked in the rim from a separate (darker) exposure.
 |
Wow. Really nice, Perry.
|
|
pharm

Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 9406
Location: Never quite sure
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 12:08 am
| |
Thanks David. It was tough bending that glass without breaking it. Good thing I have superhuman strength!
|
|
amvasey
Joined: 14 Nov 2006
Posts: 114
Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:32 am
| |
Thanks to all for the advice so far. Annette thanks for the diagram; I plan to try out your layout this week. Perry, that is a great shot of a wine glass; thanks for the tips on combining raw files. I tried your tip and it did improve the shot greatly.
This is the best I have been able to come up with so far. The wine glass was in a cubelite isolation cube. The white background was the back wall of the cube. The glass was sitting on a highly polish piece of black granite. The lighting used was two 500 watt hot lights. One light was behind the cube directly behind the glass at a level above the glass and the camera. The other light was directly in front of the glass, diffused and above the level of the camera and the glass. The photo was shot in raw. I processed the raw file with different exposure settings and combined them in photoshop. I then applied a levels layer on just the white background to bring it up to true white. The glass still looks dirty gray and flat to me.
Audrey
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
75.6 KB |
| Viewed: |
3949 Time(s) |

|
|
|
graphicphoto

Joined: 23 Oct 2006
Posts: 2452
Location: In your brain, stealing your ideas!
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:53 am
| |
That's easy to fix. Make a duplicate layer and either use your history brush or the dodge tool. Easier that setting up more lighting to light the background!
Here is what I got with the dodge tool.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
58.05 KB |
| Viewed: |
3943 Time(s) |

|
|
|
davidcrehner

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 4839
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 12:33 pm
| |
Hmm, not bad, but the original glass looks to have a magenta cast to me, and Annette's—while better—appears slightly yellow.
Perry's looks great.
|
|
amvasey
Joined: 14 Nov 2006
Posts: 114
Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 2:49 pm
| |
I see what you are saying David. How would you fix it?
|
|
graphicphoto

Joined: 23 Oct 2006
Posts: 2452
Location: In your brain, stealing your ideas!
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 7:21 pm
| |
| davidcrehner wrote: | Hmm, not bad, but the original glass looks to have a magenta cast to me, and Annette's—while better—appears slightly yellow.
Perry's looks great. |
Rub your eyes. I didn't change any color.
|
|
davidcrehner

Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Posts: 4839
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 6:45 am
| |
| graphicphoto wrote: | | davidcrehner wrote: | Hmm, not bad, but the original glass looks to have a magenta cast to me, and Annette's—while better—appears slightly yellow.
Perry's looks great. |
Rub your eyes. I didn't change any color. |
Still looks slightly yellow.
Here... I downloaded your version, Annette, and opened in PS. I used the color picker and clicked on the edge of the glass. This is what PS showed me (notice the shade of palette it chose):
(When I take a screenshot, it hides the mouse pointers, so you can't see that I was clicking on the edge of the glass)
Then I downloaded the OP's version and used the same color picker method to click on the glass. This is what PS showed me (notice the shade of palette it chooses has way more red mixed in?):
As for what I would do? I went with Annette's version, and converted to grayscale to remove all color cast (BTW, when you do this step, immediately you can see the glass "change color" and it looks clean and clear, then converted back to RGB, did a soft light layer at 36%, and that was it.
BTW, color casts are obviously not always a bad thing. Only when you didn't intend them, and in this case I think it looks better without any color. Also, the glass and table are not level with the frame. I didn't bother fixing it (just use the ruler tool) but you can see up at the top of the frame that there is more vertical space between the glass and the top of the frame on one side than the other.
|
|
amvasey
Joined: 14 Nov 2006
Posts: 114
Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:28 am
| |
Wow, with the changes that Annette and David made my shot really changed for the better. I knew that the photo was a little crooked and the glass is not even polished. I figured that those were easy things to fix on a reshoot once the major problem was solved. Thank you both for all your help and advice. The black granite looks so much better (before it had a brown cast) and the glass looks great. David, I am still a newbie to photography so please be patient with my next question. You said you did a soft light layer at 36 %, what is that and how do you do it?
|
|
| |
|