| Author |
Message |
nemosdad

Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 607
Location: Wakefield, RI
|
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 4:12 am
| |
Does anyone here use a Nikon L100 for Shutterstock work? I'm looking for an inexpensive, but suitable, camera that's more compact than my DSLR. Thanks for any information on this camera or others you might recommend ($250 max price). Again, thanks. |
|
luissantos84

Joined: 29 Jan 2009
Posts: 915
Location: Portugal http://ministocking.blogspot.com
|
Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 7:41 pm
| |
buy a Nikon D40 or D60 on second hand! |
|
frankspee
Joined: 20 May 2009
Posts: 47
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 5:12 am
| |
A Powershot G9 (secondhand) or anything from the IXUS series (stay away from the cheapies though) from Canon should produce something acceptable? |
|
nemosdad

Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 607
Location: Wakefield, RI
|
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 6:18 am
| |
Thank you. M.G. |
|
jeffbanke

Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 13737
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, slipping into darkness
|
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:27 pm
| |
Personally I would forget the PS idea, go for a smaller DSLR if you like, but here is the problem, 90% of the quality of an image is based on the quality of the glass! There is no P&S that can compete with even the lowest grade SLR lenses, and since many of us are using Pro grade lenses, the competition is getting stiffer and stiffer for any P&S to compete in this market, it just will not cut it. So I am afraid you will be wasting your money. If you want to throw money in a better direction, buy some pro grade glass for your SLR! |
|
pio3

Joined: 26 Jun 2009
Posts: 139
Location: Italy
|
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 8:14 am
| |
I have a canon G9, I'm sorry but most of the time the pics, even shooting in raw, are not so good as it would seem... especially if you check it at 100%. |
|
| |
|