| Author |
Message |
hellem
Joined: 26 Oct 2008
Posts: 69
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:03 pm
|  |
thank you milinz, nice to know |
|
milinz
Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 3413
Location: Planet Earth
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:14 pm
| |
| hellem wrote: | | thank you milinz, nice to know |
You're welcome anytime I might know some answer. |
|
eternalspline
Joined: 19 Jan 2007
Posts: 310
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:00 pm
| |
I would still say do 30 FPS if your doing CG.
It's preference and target audience. If your doing your work with the hopes that it will play on American television they use 29.97 FPS, also known as NTSC (national television standard committee) so what a movie plays at is not of much relevance, except that it's what television across the pond plays at that is also 25 FPS I believe. TV is your target audience since very few clips are ever selected for movies that play in the theater.
The reason we do non interlaced is it's a form of compression and if you needed upper field first and we delivered it in lower it would be a problem. I have not done it but I heard there were ways to remove it but I believe it degrades the quality. It's not really some thing I have experience dealing with but I have read about it. |
|
milinz
Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 3413
Location: Planet Earth
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:13 pm
| |
| eternalspline wrote: | I would still say do 30 FPS if your doing CG.
It's preference and target audience. If your doing your work with the hopes that it will play on American television they use 29.97 FPS, also known as NTSC (national television standard committee) so what a movie plays at is not of much relevance, except that it's what television across the pond plays at that is also 25 FPS I believe. TV is your target audience since very few clips are ever selected for movies that play in the theater.
The reason we do non interlaced is it's a form of compression and if you needed upper field first and we delivered it in lower it would be a problem. I have not done it but I heard there were ways to remove it but I believe it degrades the quality. It's not really some thing I have experience dealing with but I have read about it. |
Any TV editor using any HD system in USA knows how to adapt 25 or 24 fps progressive video to Full HD 1080i... It is just a process called sometimes 'telecine' or pull-up... And regarding clip of 30 sec length max it is done in no time!
If not so I can work instead of him. I heard that they have very nice wages for TV editors ;-) |
|
eternalspline
Joined: 19 Jan 2007
Posts: 310
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:11 pm
| |
Yes and across the pond they know how to do the same thing.
Like I said though "It's preference and target audience"
I kind of feel like the people across the pond are so used to doing the conversion it makes since to have them do it and not the US audience. That's just a feeling though, no basis on any thing really. I mean we don't get any of there TV here, but they have allot of our shows...Depending on what area we are talking about.
30 FPS down converts slower (more time) where 25 up converts to be faster (less time) I also like that aspect.
Really we could go back and forth on this, but it's not a huge thing. If your target audience is X work in X if it's Y work in Y. |
|
| |
|
Log in
