Welcome, Anonymous (Profile, Private Messages)
Having trouble signing into the forums? Please [ logout ] and log back in.  Log inLog in 
SEARCH:     » Advanced Search

Shutterstock Photographer Forum Forum Index : General Shutterstock Submit Discussion :
is this model's tattoos too much for stock?
 
Post new topic    Reply to topic
Author Message
thoth11


Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Posts: 788
Location: Green Bay, WI
Post Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:40 pm     Reply with quote

I was contacted by a model for a tfp shoot. I recently started charging models a nominal $40 fee for a shoot with a signed release and permission for stock usage. However, I'm thinking this model's tats may be a bit too much for stock particularly her right arm/shoulder. I think I would need the tattoo artist release. Model's port - http://www.bemodel.com/AlyshaWilliams
She could be cute/pretty but piercings don't help either. I'm just thinking I would need to charge her what I state I charge for model shoots on my webpage (www.donjoskiphotography.com) of $125 or it wouldn't be worth my time if I can't get stock sales. Does this all sound about right to you? Thanks in advance.
stephenkirsh


Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Posts: 143
Location: California
Post Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 12:19 am     Reply with quote

looks like her other shoulder is clean. Do shoots that don't focus on the tat'ed shoulder?

Does she have to be naked? You can just cover it with clothes, too.
thoth11


Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Posts: 788
Location: Green Bay, WI
Post Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:40 am     Reply with quote

stephenkirsh wrote:
looks like her other shoulder is clean. Do shoots that don't focus on the tat'ed shoulder?

Does she have to be naked? You can just cover it with clothes, too.
Yeah I would have her wearing clothes but probably some in less clothing and I would focus on her clean shoulder. I'll probably tell her okay for a fee. Thanks for your input.
easyshoot


Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 112
Post Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:54 pm     Reply with quote

Am i getting this right? You are taking photographs from Models to sell this pictures at Microstock ad the Models have to pay YOU to be in the picture???
rinder99


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 19009
Location: Books and Class Info, www.rindersmithphotography.com or, www.rinderart.com
Post Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:10 am     Reply with quote

My question is $40.00?? I think you can do better than that and find a better looking model for free.Your port is filled with Gorgeous women. what are ya doing with this person.and tat's are copyrighted.never understood why but they are.
nemo1024


Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 105
Post Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 5:58 am     Reply with quote

And here is me, refraining from people photography because I thought that I would ave to pay THEM to feature in my shots... :/
webthrower


Joined: 29 Jan 2006
Posts: 1142
Location: North Carolina www.jtphotodesign.com
Post Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 9:45 am     Reply with quote

easyshoot wrote:
Am i getting this right? You are taking photographs from Models to sell this pictures at Microstock ad the Models have to pay YOU to be in the picture???


nemo1024 wrote:
And here is me, refraining from people photography because I thought that I would ave to pay THEM to feature in my shots... :/



They (Amateurs) will sometimes pay you or at least trade (Professionals) if you give them something they want in return.

I never pay models. Some want to be paid but there are so many more that will do it for trade if your work is good and you give them something they can use for their portfolio.
studio544


Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Posts: 18
Post Posted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:19 pm     Reply with quote

One has 50 million models without tattoos and a few with tattos, i think there's a market for those few for sure. I would love to shoot that living canvas.
rinder99


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 19009
Location: Books and Class Info, www.rindersmithphotography.com or, www.rinderart.com
Post Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2009 12:33 pm     Reply with quote

webthrower wrote:
easyshoot wrote:
Am i getting this right? You are taking photographs from Models to sell this pictures at Microstock ad the Models have to pay YOU to be in the picture???


nemo1024 wrote:
And here is me, refraining from people photography because I thought that I would ave to pay THEM to feature in my shots... :/



They (Amateurs) will sometimes pay you or at least trade (Professionals) if you give them something they want in return.

I never pay models. Some want to be paid but there are so many more that will do it for trade if your work is good and you give them something they can use for their portfolio.


Extremely true. I give them stuff that gets them work. they do for me for free. But it's not free. I spend much more time than any model spends on me posing.If ya don't give them work they can use. You should pay them.
easyshoot


Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 112
Post Posted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:12 am     Reply with quote

Hello Rinder,
that`s a good point and i understand that. Giving them work in return for posing for the photographer seems to me a fair deal, if the model is new, not known or whatever. But to let them pay also to be in a shooting which is clearly for business purposes for the photograher... i couldn`t do that. Maybe i am not enough business type photographer.
dmvphotos


Joined: 05 Sep 2008
Posts: 392
Location: Virginia, USA
Post Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 7:05 pm     Reply with quote

rinder99 wrote:
My question is $40.00?? I think you can do better than that and find a better looking model for free.Your port is filled with Gorgeous women. what are ya doing with this person.and tat's are copyrighted.never understood why but they are.


Are tatoo's copyrighted even when they were originally designed by the person wearing them? What if the person who designed them, and is wearing them, signs the release?
hhltdave5


Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 10887
Location: Our stock and food photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com
Post Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 7:17 pm     Reply with quote

dmvphotos wrote:
rinder99 wrote:
My question is $40.00?? I think you can do better than that and find a better looking model for free.Your port is filled with Gorgeous women. what are ya doing with this person.and tat's are copyrighted.never understood why but they are.


Are tatoo's copyrighted even when they were originally designed by the person wearing them? What if the person who designed them, and is wearing them, signs the release?


If the person who designed and did the tattoos signs a property release then they can be used. It is their work and they are authorizing it be used.
dmvphotos


Joined: 05 Sep 2008
Posts: 392
Location: Virginia, USA
Post Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 7:38 pm     Reply with quote

hhltdave5 wrote:
dmvphotos wrote:
rinder99 wrote:
My question is $40.00?? I think you can do better than that and find a better looking model for free.Your port is filled with Gorgeous women. what are ya doing with this person.and tat's are copyrighted.never understood why but they are.


Are tatoo's copyrighted even when they were originally designed by the person wearing them? What if the person who designed them, and is wearing them, signs the release?


If the person who designed and did the tattoos signs a property release then they can be used. It is their work and they are authorizing it be used.


Thanks for the response! Does that means it is okay if I sign a release for my tattoo since I brought in the drawing and it is on me?

BTW I got the stock and food discs today and got through the first 35 pages of the stock one! Thanks for sharing your knowledge with me!
hhltdave5


Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 10887
Location: Our stock and food photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com
Post Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:26 pm     Reply with quote

dmvphotos wrote:
hhltdave5 wrote:
dmvphotos wrote:
rinder99 wrote:
My question is $40.00?? I think you can do better than that and find a better looking model for free.Your port is filled with Gorgeous women. what are ya doing with this person.and tat's are copyrighted.never understood why but they are.


Are tatoo's copyrighted even when they were originally designed by the person wearing them? What if the person who designed them, and is wearing them, signs the release?


If the person who designed and did the tattoos signs a property release then they can be used. It is their work and they are authorizing it be used.


Thanks for the response! Does that means it is okay if I sign a release for my tattoo since I brought in the drawing and it is on me?

BTW I got the stock and food discs today and got through the first 35 pages of the stock one! Thanks for sharing your knowledge with me!


I would say that the person who designed the tattoo would be the one needing to sign the release seeing that it can be considered their artwork. You would be the canvas the art is placed on in my opinion.

Glad you are enjoying the books so far. I hope they continue to give you valuable information.
terrymr


Joined: 21 Dec 2008
Posts: 71
Post Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:56 pm     Reply with quote

hhltdave5 wrote:

I would say that the person who designed the tattoo would be the one needing to sign the release seeing that it can be considered their artwork. You would be the canvas the art is placed on in my opinion.

Glad you are enjoying the books so far. I hope they continue to give you valuable information.


A tattoo may be considered a "work for hire" in which case the copyright belongs to the person who commissioned it - but it seems to be a gray area as tattoo artists haven't been much for copyright in the past and have been more than willing to copy each others work.
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT - 5 Hours

 

Submit Referer Program Tell a Friend! Privacy Policy Terms of Service Contact Us



Shutterstock Forum for Submitters