| Author |
Message |
daro28
Joined: 12 Oct 2005
Posts: 68
Location: Everybody has photographic memory, some just don't have film
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 1:32 pm
|  |
Awesome!!!
Question: Are animations created in After Effects or Flash accepted? |
|
pantoja
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 218
Location: Costa Rica
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 1:51 pm
| |
Congratulations Jon and the entire team.
Even video is not in my plans and I will not be participating in that project... I know you will exceed your goals as always!!!
A big hug...
Al |
|
reviewer
Admin
Joined: 01 Jan 2005
Posts: 1633
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 1:52 pm
| |
Hey everyone!
Please post your Footage questions in the new Footage catagory! |
|
rodehi
Joined: 11 Jan 2005
Posts: 1914
Location: British Columbia Canada
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 1:54 pm
| |
Im not sure I like the idea of sharing our site with videographers,this is a stock image site.What does this initiative do for us photographers?Besides cluttering up the site,I just dont see any benefit for us.I think this would be better as another site altogether.Perhaps someone can convince me otherwise? |
|
medveh
Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Posts: 1555
Location: Transylvania
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 1:55 pm
| |
GREAT NEWS
I gonna buy a digital video camera... |
|
zastavkin
Joined: 02 Jan 2005
Posts: 359
Location: Stock Photographers Club
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:08 pm
| |
| rodehi wrote: | | Im not sure I like the idea of sharing our site with videographers,this is a stock image site.What does this initiative do for us photographers?Besides cluttering up the site,I just dont see any benefit for us.I think this would be better as another site altogether.Perhaps someone can convince me otherwise? |
It will atract people who search videoclips. But This people may need pictures also. They will not by SS subscription. But the per-picture-sales may increase.
Jon, my advice:
When anyone searches video it would be not bad to place on the bottom of search results page the string of pictures (from Stocktogo) to be corresponding this search.
Sory for my bad spelling. |
|
shutterstock
Joined: 22 Oct 2004
Posts: 1883
Location: New York, NY
|
|
thoth11
Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Posts: 781
Location: Green Bay, WI
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:28 pm
| |
I thought about stock video awhile ago, I just didn't know if it was something that was used. Now I know. Like most have stated, time to spend another grand or two on a video camera. |
|
elise
Joined: 01 Jul 2005
Posts: 30
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 4:48 pm
| |
That's a great new, video is my other passion. I just hope I will find good things to shoot for stock. |
|
rodehi
Joined: 11 Jan 2005
Posts: 1914
Location: British Columbia Canada
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:08 pm
| |
OK sorry I assumed they were being packaged together because of the changes to my submitters/home page.
Cool concept hope it flies for you.
A few years ago I was shopping for a digicam(for rafting of course)but wasnt really happy with the selection available in my price range.On a whim I decided to go with a digital camera instead,the rest is history :) |
|
izoneguy
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 86
Location: Dallas, Texas
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:14 pm
| |
How are the pay rates determined??
Can this be footage we have on other sites as well? What about HD footage??
Will you have a separate category for HD?
One suggestion, have a standard for the .avi & .mov files, or it could get real nasty will quick. Every NLE uses it's own codec so you have to be careful what you are offering. I assume you will have the same kind of model release as you do for the still photos? |
|
dink
Joined: 14 May 2005
Posts: 76
Location: UK
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 6:35 pm
| |
Sounds interesting :) |
|
Bluecooper2002
Joined: 21 Apr 2005
Posts: 23
Location: St.Louis Missouri
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 6:50 pm
| |
I uploaded a video by ftp like it said in the tutorial but when I went to the submitted footage page it said there was no video submitted. And it has been an hour now. Did I miss a key step?
thanks for the help,
Neil |
|
Paul_Lewis
Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 4091
Location: Waterford, MI (Detroit)
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 10:48 pm
| |
| rodehi wrote: | | Im not sure I like the idea of sharing our site with videographers,this is a stock image site.What does this initiative do for us photographers?Besides cluttering up the site,I just dont see any benefit for us.I think this would be better as another site altogether.Perhaps someone can convince me otherwise? |
As an experienced 2D designer in major Detroit video post houses for ten years, there are always needs for both stock photography and video. Obviously video can't do print, but photos can always work within video. Don't freak out -- as a photographer, my experience says you have the advantage. A shot of the Empire State Building with "film" or video would be essentially the same... But the video version couldn't stand up to more than an 8"x10" print. Video is only 72dpi. No more, no less (US standard). More than 2x and you see the interlace of even and odd lines, edges become blurred and aliased, and there's noise like you wouldn't believe.
It think stock footage rocks. I used to use a lot of moving backgrounds before After Effects, Motion, et. al. came out by just shooting abstracts of moving fabrics and lights as a video bed. This will just make the site a better resource for "creatives" out there.
Here's a pretty decent tutorial for anyone who wants to dabble in both worlds. It will explain resolutions and canvas sizes in Photoshop (or other programs)...
http://www.videouniversity.com/photoVid2.html
The good thing about video is that it will just throw out any pixels that it can't use. A BIG difference from trying to eek out extra resolution for larger sizes in the print world.
Way to go Jon & Co. Keep up the brand leadership. |
|
photomafia
Joined: 16 Dec 2005
Posts: 24
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 11:00 pm
| |
wow |
|
| |
|
Log in
