Welcome, Anonymous (Profile, Private Messages)
Having trouble signing into the forums? Please [ logout ] and log back in.
 Log inLog in 
SEARCH:     » Advanced Search

Shutterstock Photographer Forum Forum Index : Questions / Answers :
Model release for buildings?

 
Post new topic    Reply to topic
Author Message
burgaflippinman


Joined: 15 Mar 2005
Posts: 4

Post Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 12:44 pm     Reply with quote

Hi, I'm new to shutterstock. :) Btw, may i ask whther model releases are required for buildings?
StuartE


Joined: 28 Nov 2004
Posts: 1606
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

Post Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2005 5:55 pm     Reply with quote

If you can get them to sign, sure... :-)

Actually, if you can get one to sign, I reckon the shots of that would be worth way, way more to the syndicated press... think of the headline - Sydney Opera House comes to life and signs model release... :-)

You only need a model release for a recognisable human - e.g., someone likely to sue if their image is used without permission - if you do have authorisation from the management of the Sydney Opera House to take photographs of the site, and to resell those images as stock, I reckon Jon would be very interested in hearing from you - otherwise, for the buildings you can't shoot without permission, submit them as editorial, that covers the copyright issue...

Cheers,
Stuart
burgaflippinman


Joined: 15 Mar 2005
Posts: 4

Post Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:57 am     Reply with quote

thks. btw, this is slightly off topic, but still on model releases, do i need a model release for self portraits? well, i wont be suing myself anytime soon but is it still bureaucratically required?...:P
fncdigital


Joined: 05 Nov 2004
Posts: 2159
Location: If there are any questions, direct them to that brick wall over there.

Post Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 2:11 am     Reply with quote

burgaflippinman wrote:
thks. btw, this is slightly off topic, but still on model releases, do i need a model release for self portraits? well, i wont be suing myself anytime soon but is it still bureaucratically required?...:P


yep you do.
StuartE


Joined: 28 Nov 2004
Posts: 1606
Location: Adelaide, South Australia

Post Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:44 am     Reply with quote

You might not sue yourself - but you could manage to get yourself in the ironically bizarre situation of suing the company using your image becasue you didn't give them permission to do so - after all, let's say they post your self portrait, and they use you as the posterboy for an ad campaign for a new cure for aids - or an article showing how the criminally insane should be kept locked up... if you've signed a model release, you can't jump up and down later...

Cheers,
Stuart
burgaflippinman


Joined: 15 Mar 2005
Posts: 4

Post Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:53 am     Reply with quote

ah thanks for ur explanation! looks like i'm still naive..hehe..oh well, i'm onli 17...:)
fncdigital


Joined: 05 Nov 2004
Posts: 2159
Location: If there are any questions, direct them to that brick wall over there.

Post Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 9:21 am     Reply with quote

burgaflippinman wrote:
ah thanks for ur explanation! looks like i'm still naive..hehe..oh well, i'm onli 17...:)


Then you need yopur parents to sign a minor reelease as well. ;)
eosguy


Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 10
Location: Kuala Lumpur

Post Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 10:52 am     Reply with quote

You actually need model release for the Eiffel Tower, shot during the night time. Daytime's OK because they don't show their patented/copyrighted light show. I think other buildings might require model release as well, best to do some research around.
burgaflippinman


Joined: 15 Mar 2005
Posts: 4

Post Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2005 5:46 pm     Reply with quote

thks again guys...:) i think i'll try to stick to generic stuff for now...:P
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT - 5 Hours

 


Shutterstock Forum for Contributors