Welcome, Anonymous (Profile, Private Messages)
Having trouble signing into the forums? Please [ logout ] and log back in.
 Log inLog in 
SEARCH:     » Advanced Search

Shutterstock Photographer Forum Forum Index : General Shutterstock Submit Discussion :
How do I shoot tabletop photography?
Page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic    Reply to topic
Author Message
kmiragaya


Joined: 24 Dec 2007
Posts: 62
Location: London

Post Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 5:20 pm     Reply with quote

Hello

I've been trying to shoot objects in a white background . I'm using a light tent and a couple of flashguns, one in each side of the light tent.Inside of the tent is a white paper I use as the background

The problem is I can't get my background to be pure white or as white as possible without blowing the objects I'm trying to shoot. I tried using pieces of black cardboard near the objects (but out of the frame) with the hope that they could absorb some of the light that was overexposing the objects but so far that approach han't given any results.If my subjects are properly exposed the background is not white and when the background is white the subjects are overexposed.

The idea of exposing the background one stop higher than the subjects to make it white is not applicable here in my opinion since the distance between subject and background is zero.

The other problem I have is that the texture of the paper (background) is visible in my pictures in the area where the objects I want to shoot are projecting shadows.

I tried to use dodge and burning and to blur the shadows to make the texture disappear but the results are not natural.

Can you tell me what am I doing wrong or a better way to do it?

Regards
rinder99


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39645
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder

Post Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 5:30 pm     Reply with quote

"The idea of exposing the background one stop higher than the subjects to make it white is not applicable here in my opinion since the distance between subject and background is zero."

One of the many reasons Light tents are useless.they were designed for e-bay stuff. Not what we do. Just a roll of white seemless is the way to go. or a HUGE light tent.you could also use Mini Flags. you just dont have many options with those things and 2 small Speedlights is not enough power.Isolations are extremly easy to do but im afraid your gonna have to invest a bit to do it perfectly in camera without fixing it later. Some can do it but, it can be done so much better and easier and correctly with a roll of seemless and more light.also ..Custom WB is the way to go.
kmiragaya


Joined: 24 Dec 2007
Posts: 62
Location: London

Post Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 5:52 pm     Reply with quote

Thanks for your very fast answer.You are always ready to help.

What I fail to understand is why do I need more power?. I can easily blow the background with my speedlights. The problem is that if I give the flashguns enough power to make the background pure white I will seriously overexpose my subject.
jeffbanke


Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17518
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California

Post Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 6:06 pm     Reply with quote

Here is a better way to go for isos


back light setup forum.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  46.04 KB
 Viewed:  3889 Time(s)

back light setup forum.jpg


hhltdave5


Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24305
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com

Post Posted: Sun Dec 06, 2009 8:06 pm     Reply with quote

One other thing that I would suggest is to use a different material to place your objects on. Seamless paper can absorb light and that is why I shoot all my table top images in which I want a white background on a piece of white plexiglass. This is more reflective and shows up whiter than seamless does. If you look at my gallery you will see the results. If it has a white background and it is product work it was done on plexiglass.

You will still most likely have to clean up the background a bit but no where near what you would need to do with paper.

You can also consider lighting the table top from the bottom by shooting on a light table.

I would agree that the regular light cubes are pretty much worthless. It makes it difficult to control the light, it scatters the light and it reduces the angles in which you can photograph the items. You don't really need it at all.

I do agree that
navnit


Joined: 11 Oct 2009
Posts: 8

Post Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 6:55 pm     Reply with quote

Good points have been made so far.

My two cents:

Do's and don'ts

Don't use tents. Your room is your tent!

Use remote speedlites or strobes (more than one, for some effects more than two), never use on-camera flash - it is harsh, its light doesn't travel very far and generally useless. You may need reflectors/ black panels for certain effects.

Go totally manual so you can tinker with light output to your liking.

First only expose background (vertical area, not horizontal) to pure white, (if your image uses vertical background)!

Now place objects on material of choice and expose correctly without getting too "hungup" about background.

Now if floor of object is not white (and I am sure it won't be, particularly if you are using paper) next step comes in.

Illuminate from below using modified (diffused) light to correctly expose the floor on which the object is resting. Be aware that if you illuminate from bottom there are two problems with that:

1) If your base is paper, fiber may show through and create uneven light.
2) If your material is more on the "transparent side" than "translucent side", CA will be an issue.

All light will need to be soft. Lighting ratios will be critical or else you will kill the soft shadows/ reflections. Any lighting from bottom has to be totally indirect at very low level.

Take the final image.

The mechanics of the process steps are easy, but you are probably not going to like the initial results since this is NOT easy. There are a lot variables in light placement and intensity, and its different for each image.

Only do this while it is fun, then take a break. This is not supposed to be a torture!

Here's a couple that I did few days ago:

http://www.shutterstock.com/results.mhtml#photo_id=42179155
http://www.shutterstock.com/results.mhtml#photo_id=42179158
eppicphotos


Joined: 10 Dec 2006
Posts: 444
Location: BC, Canada www.eppicphotography.com

Post Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 8:42 pm     Reply with quote

Materials:

-Cardboard box (13"x13"x17")
-white tissue paper
-1 13"x19" photo paper for the seamless bottom
-2 daylight 6500 kelvin energy efficient bulbs (13 watts power each with 60w output equivalent)

The result:



It is possible to do it on the cheap.
ruxpriencdiam


Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26816
Location: Third Stone from the Sun

Post Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:09 pm     Reply with quote

First thing let me say listen to Laurin/Jeff and Dave on this issue they will steer you right especially for "isolations"! I have done most of mine on White poster board one 2x3 on the table and one standing up for the back.

I have used the on camera flash since it is close shooting and set its exposure in camera to soften, and i cancel shadows with other lights i have availiable and use a black poster board to absorb any excess light since i dont have strobes yet.

The isolations so far are a little tedious in the clean up process since i havent yet got a piece of white plexiglass as Dave has said to use! But i have just found a quicker easier way to clean them up that i have yet to try that will save me mucho time!

So in closing i say whatever you do since you are looking for a true "isolation" IE no shadows or reflections listen to Laurin/Jeff and Dave!



Notice no shadows or reflections!
eppicphotos


Joined: 10 Dec 2006
Posts: 444
Location: BC, Canada www.eppicphotography.com

Post Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:59 pm     Reply with quote

Quote:
The isolations so far are a little tedious in the clean up process since i havent yet got a piece of white plexiglass as Dave has said to use!


Oh that reminds me, for the above example image I used a white high gloss piece of ceramic tile as my base, available at Home Depot stores for a couple bucks. If you shoot at a higher angle, you get minimal reflection but if you shoot at a very low angle (close to the base) you'll get more reflection; all depending on what you're wanting to achieve.
Just my two cents.
ruxpriencdiam


Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26816
Location: Third Stone from the Sun

Post Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 10:17 pm     Reply with quote

Quote:
Oh that reminds me, for the above example image I used a white high gloss piece of ceramic tile as my base, available at Home Depot stores for a couple bucks. If you shoot at a higher angle, you get minimal reflection but if you shoot at a very low angle (close to the base) you'll get more reflection; all depending on what you're wanting to achieve.
Just my two cents.
Nice idea i will see what else is easily availiable! I wrote mine as you were writing yours good tips and ideas.
soctober


Joined: 15 Sep 2006
Posts: 990
Location: www.foto-melange.com

Post Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:03 am     Reply with quote

navnit wrote:
Good points have been made so far.

My two cents:

Do's and don'ts

Don't use tents. Your room is your tent!

Use remote speedlites or strobes (more than one, for some effects more than two), never use on-camera flash - it is harsh, its light doesn't travel very far and generally useless. You may need reflectors/ black panels for certain effects.

Go totally manual so you can tinker with light output to your liking.

First only expose background (vertical area, not horizontal) to pure white, (if your image uses vertical background)!

Now place objects on material of choice and expose correctly without getting too "hungup" about background.

Now if floor of object is not white (and I am sure it won't be, particularly if you are using paper) next step comes in.

Illuminate from below using modified (diffused) light to correctly expose the floor on which the object is resting. Be aware that if you illuminate from bottom there are two problems with that:

1) If your base is paper, fiber may show through and create uneven light.
2) If your material is more on the "transparent side" than "translucent side", CA will be an issue.

All light will need to be soft. Lighting ratios will be critical or else you will kill the soft shadows/ reflections. Any lighting from bottom has to be totally indirect at very low level.

Take the final image.

The mechanics of the process steps are easy, but you are probably not going to like the initial results since this is NOT easy. There are a lot variables in light placement and intensity, and its different for each image.

Only do this while it is fun, then take a break. This is not supposed to be a torture!

Here's a couple that I did few days ago:

http://www.shutterstock.com/results.mhtml#photo_id=42179155
http://www.shutterstock.com/results.mhtml#photo_id=42179158


Hi Navnit

Just a little note that your description of the "wasabi coated peas" being isolated is not correct to say. Isolation refers to a subject that is on a background without any shadows either on the surface of the base or on the background itself. So your subject is not isolated but rather on a white background due to the shadows it has casted.
kmiragaya


Joined: 24 Dec 2007
Posts: 62
Location: London

Post Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 7:32 am     Reply with quote

Ok, thank you all for your answers

I'll try to get a piece of acrylic or something less opaque than the paper I have been using. That way I guess I can overexpose the background without overexposing the subject too much.
jeffbanke


Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17518
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California

Post Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 1:05 pm     Reply with quote

kmiragaya wrote:
Ok, thank you all for your answers

I'll try to get a piece of acrylic or something less opaque than the paper I have been using. That way I guess I can overexpose the background without overexposing the subject too much.


The trick if one is shooting through an acrylic/paper/silk or whatever is not getting too much light such that it causes "blooming", or flare in the lens. This means it needs to be pretty flat lighting, (no hot spots), and this can best be achieved by additional diffusers in front of the rear light. Remeber that additional diffusers will reduce that amount of light, so in general the 2x factor still would be in effect.
Meaning, that you will use approximately 2x the light to illuminate a background compared to the light in the main and fill sources. So if you go back and look at the diagram I posted, imagine the main and fill are in the region of 200w/s, and the background in the area of 400w/s.

Modern monolights, let you dial up and down for relative power and make this an easy adjustment. However like I said just keep the diffusion of the rear light so that there is no flare.
rinder99


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39645
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder

Post Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:12 pm     Reply with quote

OR>>>> Spend a few bucks and get this. perfect isolations every single time.

http://www.adorama.com/LSLT39.html?searchinfo=lastolite&item_no=131
tsmarkley


Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 1

Post Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:55 pm     Reply with quote

Are you shooting raw or jpeg in the camera. With raw you can a lot more in post production to fix white balance issues.
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 2 All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1, 2  Next

 


Shutterstock Forum for Contributors