| Author |
Message |
jeremysale
Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 2
Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 5:04 pm
|  |
Adventures in Time-lapse
By Jeremy Sale, Shutterstock Footage submitter
(This is the seventh article in a series provided in association with Shutterstock)
I have always enjoyed time-lapse photography, and have great respect for both the pioneers in film and the digital artisans of today. There is so much affordable technology now available to the amateur that it is almost impossible to resist the call, if you are so inspired. I don't know how many dilettantes were messing with time-lapse rigs before digital, but I'm guessing it was a pretty small club. Cinematic operas like Baraka and Koyaaniskatsi were the product of top-notch professionals—gorgeous visual poetry that would make the rest of us drool, while we contented ourselves with stills.
However, things have changed. Some of today’s DSLRs have intervalometers for programming a series of time-lapse shots, or one can be hooked up to your camera as an accessory. Big LCDs give you instant feedback on your exposure, and affordable software has made it easy to translate JPEGs into high quality HD1080 (and beyond). But you can't just aim your camera at the clouds and read a magazine for an hour. Sellable time-lapse requires new ideas, novel techniques and a constantly evolving look at what clients are buying.
http://footage.shutterstock.com/video.html?id=566974
This video was certainly one of my most fun to compose. I love neon colors and the high-contrast look of city streets at night. You get fewer strange looks at night, too. Driving in daylight, you've got people wondering if you work for Google Maps or if you're just some voyeuristic psycho. At night, you're just another wacky artist, probably a film student.
In this case, I used my old Nikon D70s with a 20mm f/2.8, mounted on a panning telescope tripod, which in turn is bolted to a "cheeseplate" (grip lingo for “piece of aluminum with holes in it”). The cheeseplate has been ratcheted down within an inch of its life on the roof of my Hyundai, with sandbags underneath. There are so many ways this can go wrong that it's best not to think about it. To add to the stress, there is no redundant restraint. Since the whole rig rotates every 10 minutes or so, there's no easy way to secure it to another part of the car in case of catastrophic failure. (Hey, there's a reason I don't use my Nikon D700.) You definitely want a filter on your lens, too.
But don't forget the math. Once you have eyeballed a good combination of aperture, shutter speed, ISO and white balance (I keep all settings on manual), you have to figure out how long you want the final product to be. Then, how many rotations of the panning rig you want to fill that time span, and what length of shutter will give you the perfect balance between “streaky headlights” and “unacceptable panning blur.” The good news is, with a big memory card and plenty of batteries, it doesn't cost much to experiment. You can blow off 2000 frames and just see what you get.
Not good enough? No problem. Turn on the radio and start driving again. Sometimes your mistakes result in great ideas. |
|
rinder99
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39156
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 9:28 pm
| |
Nice piece.....Thanks |
|
ruxpriencdiam
Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26208
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:32 pm
| |
Nice yes the hustle and bustle of the nightlife of the citylife. |
|
bred
Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Posts: 1654
Location: Scotland
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:43 pm
| |
Very cool finished product. How long did you spend painstakingly removing the logos, faces and licence plates and what is the shutter count now at on your D70s?! |
|
dustine
Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 925
Location: You're in my viewfinder...
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:30 pm
| |
Oh my gosh, did that make me dizzy! Stop the world, I want to get off! LOL! Kind of like what it would be like if we actually felt our world as it is spinning in space, I'll bet.
Nice Job. |
|
dustine
Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 925
Location: You're in my viewfinder...
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:31 pm
| |
| bred wrote: | | Very cool finished product. How long did you spend painstakingly removing the logos, faces and licence plates and what is the shutter count now at on your D70s?! |
Are you kidding? Everything went to fast to recognize faces or read any logos! That's the secret! |
|
paulprescott
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 189
|
|
dustine
Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 925
Location: You're in my viewfinder...
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 4:47 pm
| |
Way cool. Can't but wonder where the highway patrol were...you really deserved a ticket for going that fast!
Both time lapse vids are awesome!
Dustie |
|
paulprescott
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 189
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 5:22 pm
| |
| dustine wrote: |
Way cool. Can't but wonder where the highway patrol were...you really deserved a ticket for going that fast!
Both time lapse vids are awesome!
Dustie |
The real sequence lasts 1m36 sec, with many tunnels, but I edited it to 13 secs.
I should put the longer version |
|
bred
Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Posts: 1654
Location: Scotland
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 6:29 pm
| |
| dustine wrote: | | bred wrote: | | Very cool finished product. How long did you spend painstakingly removing the logos, faces and licence plates and what is the shutter count now at on your D70s?! |
Are you kidding? Everything went to fast to recognize faces or read any logos! That's the secret! |
I just read the title of the clip. |
|
paulprescott
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 189
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 6:47 pm
| |
| bred wrote: | | dustine wrote: | | bred wrote: | | Very cool finished product. How long did you spend painstakingly removing the logos, faces and licence plates and what is the shutter count now at on your D70s?! |
Are you kidding? Everything went to fast to recognize faces or read any logos! That's the secret! |
I just read the title of the clip. |
That's sad having to do that. Frame by frame. I wouldn't have bothered as the motion is so fast. Unless the reviewers check each single frame...that would be long at 24fps!! |
|
varius
Joined: 19 Mar 2006
Posts: 5593
Location: Bietigheim - Bissingen, Germany
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:30 am
| |
| paulprescott wrote: | | Unless the reviewers check each single frame...that would be long at 24fps!! |
If the clip suggests that there might be copyrighted material in some frames, they DO check every single frame. At least they do that nowadays. When footage section was young, they didn't. |
|
paulprescott
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 189
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 9:49 am
| |
| varius wrote: | | paulprescott wrote: | | Unless the reviewers check each single frame...that would be long at 24fps!! |
If the clip suggests that there might be copyrighted material in some frames, they DO check every single frame. At least they do that nowadays. When footage section was young, they didn't. |
you mean they don't want subliminal advertising???!! |
|
| |
|
Log in
