| Author |
Message |
bichon

Joined: 19 Aug 2005
Posts: 11329
Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed May 26, 2010 11:56 am
| |
i am really fed up with capcha..
1) the words on black are often inelligable causing me to refresh 2 , 3 or 5 times.
2) the words are too long
i've seen some better ones out there.. simple ones..
like they show you a picture and you just choose the word describing it from , i think, a drop down box..
or systems without words on black blotches...
i think i've seen a capcha without those black backgrounds...
anyone agree ?
|
|
filipeb

Joined: 01 Mar 2006
Posts: 952
Location: Algarve - Portugal
|
Posted: Wed May 26, 2010 12:29 pm
| |
| bichon wrote: | i am really fed up with capcha..
1) the words on black are often inelligable causing me to refresh 2 , 3 or 5 times.
2) the words are too long
i've seen some better ones out there.. simple ones..
like they show you a picture and you just choose the word describing it from , i think, a drop down box..
or systems without words on black blotches...
i think i've seen a capcha without those black backgrounds...
anyone agree ? |
I AGREE
A word and a question:
insert the 3rd (Random) letter of the word
i saw this somewhere...
|
|
bichon

Joined: 19 Aug 2005
Posts: 11329
Location: Canada
|
Posted: Wed May 26, 2010 3:01 pm
| |
nope. doesn't work
|
|
apotterdd

Joined: 10 Apr 2009
Posts: 6984
Location: Trying to get my latinum back from Quark
|
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 8:40 pm
| |
Do buyers have to sign in with a captcha system? If not, why do the contributors need to?
|
|
newstar88

Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Posts: 1
Location: Bucyrus, OH
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 5:39 pm
| |
I find color coded ones are even harder to do as a colorblind submitter. I don't like the current one all as well as others I've seen either. Isn't it a little outdated?
~Nate
|
|
bichon

Joined: 19 Aug 2005
Posts: 11329
Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:07 pm
| |
| newstar88 wrote: | I find color coded ones are even harder to do as a colorblind submitter. I don't like the current one all as well as others I've seen either. Isn't it a little outdated?
~Nate |
its just a royal pain in the a$$. this is the only place i've seen the black backgound version...
i really have to regenerate when the letters merge into the background.
i am really really really fed up... i mean a random generating program (which capcha prevents) has the ssme difficulty, with background or no background.
why i have to waste time on this (and the words are crazy long).....
the only place ...
the only ....
place..
|
|
lilcrazyfuzzy

Joined: 29 Nov 2005
Posts: 12926
Location: 50°46′31″N 6°4′58″E
|
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 5:55 am
| |
Have your eyes tested ;)
<<<<-
|
|
lkeiows

Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 133
Location: Osaka, Japan
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:18 am
| |
Why don't they show it only to those who abuse the service?
This is really depressing.
Last edited by lkeiows on Sun May 01, 2011 12:44 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
pdtnc

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 78
Location: UK - Leeds
|
Posted: Fri Jul 16, 2010 11:37 am
| |
Yeah, it is thoroughly doing my head in, it actually puts me off logging in some days.
Get rid of it!
|
|
pjmorley
Joined: 15 Apr 2005
Posts: 3299
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 1:14 pm
| |
| apotterdd wrote: | | Do buyers have to sign in with a captcha system? If not, why do the contributors need to? |
No, buyers don't have to sign in with a captcha system. The only reason I can think of for having the captcha system for contributors is to prevent the collection of data by automated 3rd party sites.
Some users sign up to these data collection sites to help track their image sales across multiple sites. However, in order for it to work, yo have to provide your usernames and passwords to allow the collection site to log into your account and access your download data.
I assume SS thinks this is an unacceptable security risk and the way to prevent it is by using a captcha system so these collection sites can't log in automatically.
I can't think of the names of any of the sites that offer this but there are a couple and as far as I know, none of them are able to include SS in their data collection because of the captcha system.
What I don't understand is why anyone would willingly give their usernames and passwords from their account s which contain private information, paypal/moneybooker details etc. to a 3rd party just so they can get a pretty graph of their downloads.
|
|
fredericb
Joined: 28 Aug 2006
Posts: 4
Location: FR
|
Posted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 12:03 pm
| |
I AGREE!
|
|
pdtnc

Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 78
Location: UK - Leeds
|
Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:09 am
| |
Just to reiterate...
This thing Pi55es me off each and every time I log in!
And it seems the words are getting more abstract with numbers and symbols, words that mean nothing making them harder to read and repeat.
|
|
memaggiesa

Joined: 10 Nov 2009
Posts: 47
|
Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:20 am
| |
Yip I'm with you.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
4.3 KB |
| Viewed: |
10614 Time(s) |

|
|
|
rinder99

Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39124
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 8:03 pm
| |
wonder what Im doing right. it never pops up.
|
|
digigandalf

Joined: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 5398
Location: Twinsburg, OH
|
Posted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 8:08 am
| |
One work-around is to just stay logged on — that is, don't log off when you go to look at other sites.
That works pretty well for my main computer, but you have to visit SS at least once a day to stay logged in. On my other computer at home, I'm always getting logged off against my will (even in less than 24 hrs.) and then the captcha fun begins.
If you have to refresh the captcha word because it's illegible (which is more than half the time), then Firefox forgets the log-in password, which it's supposed to remember. Aaargggh!
|
|
| |
|