| Author |
Message |
fosh
Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 6
Location: Manchester, UK
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 1:30 pm
|  |
Been wondering shld I upload these photos since I first joined SS... but everytime I decided to, there is always a sound that say "stop!" Do you think its worthwhile uploading? Thanks!
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
222.96 KB |
| Viewed: |
2891 Time(s) |
|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
138.21 KB |
| Viewed: |
2891 Time(s) |
|
| Description: |
|
Download |
| Filename: |
Venice 2.jpg |
| Filesize: |
128.44 KB |
| Downloaded: |
156 Time(s) |
|
|
csubick
Joined: 16 Mar 2005
Posts: 187
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 1:35 pm
| |
I think the first one is fine. The lighting is similar to this photo http://www.shutterstock.com/pic.mhtml?&id=260752 (which by the way is on the the top 50 list)
I'm not too sure about the second one though.
|
|
ragnarawk
Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 247
Location: Toronto
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 3:30 pm
| |
Venice 3 is certainly worth uploading. Venice 2 and 1, I have a problem with what appears to be scaffolding on the building in the background. If you can get rid of that, that would improve the images (IMO). And for Venice 2, try lining the water line up with the frame - it seems to be a little off-level (which was a criticism on another picture, recently given by a reviewer).
I like the shots, though, in my unexpert opinion.
|
|
fosh
Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 6
Location: Manchester, UK
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 5:50 pm
| |
thanks for the comments... definitely helped to booast my self-confidence... :) Going to upload the Venice 3 pic first and see how it goes.....
ragnarawk, yeah... u really have sharp eyes... the church was unfortunately under construction when I was there. I was still hoping to pass it off as part of the design.... :p
|
|
ragnarawk
Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 247
Location: Toronto
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 10:28 pm
| |
Well, if I didn't think it'd be easy to fix I wouldn't have suggested it. But that it's noticeable AND easy to fix, I felt I had to mention it. If it wasn't fixable, I wouldn't have endorsed its submission.
Good pictures, though (but I'm not a reviewer).
|
|
Forgiss
Joined: 16 Mar 2005
Posts: 5107
Location: For videos of our shoots: https://vimeo.com/shootsimaging
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 1:11 pm
| |
oi,
how come added images sometimes show on the forum and sometimes show as an attachment?
how do you get it to show like you did in the first post?
sean
|
|
fosh
Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 6
Location: Manchester, UK
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 5:22 pm
| |
To be honest, I have no idea too. :p If you notice, I actually uploaded 3 pics, but only 2 of them are shown.
|
|
StuartE
Joined: 28 Nov 2004
Posts: 1606
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2005 8:06 pm
| |
Sean,
I believe there are both physical size (byte) and dimension (pixels X pixels) limits on what will be displayed - hence a 640 X 480 might display, and 480 X 640 might not... the byte count might be just a limit on what can be uploaded to a forum, I can't remember for sure...
Cheers,
Stuart
|
|
Forgiss
Joined: 16 Mar 2005
Posts: 5107
Location: For videos of our shoots: https://vimeo.com/shootsimaging
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 1:51 am
| |
Stuart to the rescue! again!
Thanx
|
|
ragnarawk
Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 247
Location: Toronto
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 10:03 am
| |
| Forgiss wrote: | Stuart to the rescue! again!
Thanx |
For sure ... Didn't you know:
That's him on the left (of course, in his younger days).
|
|
Forgiss
Joined: 16 Mar 2005
Posts: 5107
Location: For videos of our shoots: https://vimeo.com/shootsimaging
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 10:05 am
| |
wow...
I hope that is not Disney imaging on SS!!!!
(I'm sorry, I just had to!)
|
|
ragnarawk
Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 247
Location: Toronto
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 15, 2005 12:13 pm
| |
Heheeh.... Well, with all due respect to Cristi, this photo was not meant to be sold, so I don't think there's any problem.
|
|
| |
|
Log in
