| Author |
Message |
braniffman
Joined: 03 Aug 2009
Posts: 238
Location: Miami
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:49 am
|  |
Hi all,
can you guys tell me how to get your images to be listed as "Super" in size?, I shoot with a 5D M-II but I never make it to the Super version.
Thanks!
|
|
rudyumans
Joined: 19 Aug 2008
Posts: 10700
Location: www.businesshelpforyou.org www.rudyumans.com
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:03 am
| |
That is strange. Even my smallest images are available in "super". Both in JPEG and TIFF
|
|
ruxpriencdiam
Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26840
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:03 am
| |
I have some that are and some that arent and it all comes down to the quality of the shot and how much information is contained in the image.
The more info the larger the shot can be.
|
|
braniffman
Joined: 03 Aug 2009
Posts: 238
Location: Miami
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:09 am
| |
| rudyumans wrote: | | That is strange. Even my smallest images are available in "super". Both in JPEG and TIFF |
Thanks but none of mine are Super.
|
|
braniffman
Joined: 03 Aug 2009
Posts: 238
Location: Miami
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:10 am
| |
| ruxpriencdiam wrote: | I have some that are and some that arent and it all comes down to the quality of the shot and how much information is contained in the image.
The more info the larger the shot can be. |
There's got to be something else, none of my images are super sized. Thanks though.
|
|
ruxpriencdiam
Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26840
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:11 am
| |
Here is what i mean.
The site has been doing this to me for the past couple of days herer it is again!
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
68.13 KB |
| Viewed: |
7605 Time(s) |
|
Last edited by ruxpriencdiam on Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:38 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
braniffman
Joined: 03 Aug 2009
Posts: 238
Location: Miami
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:28 am
| |
| ruxpriencdiam wrote: | | Here is what i mean. |
I don't see anything....the image is not displaying.
|
|
ruxpriencdiam
Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26840
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:40 am
| |
| braniffman wrote: | | ruxpriencdiam wrote: | | Here is what i mean. |
I don't see anything....the image is not displaying. |
Reposted it!
|
|
braniffman
Joined: 03 Aug 2009
Posts: 238
Location: Miami
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 9:25 am
| |
| ruxpriencdiam wrote: | Here is what i mean.
The site has been doing this to me for the past couple of days herer it is again! |
I totally see what you mean but in most cases the Super images are the same size as mine, so that is what I don't get. At first I thought ah, it's about more pixels but it is not as you can see in this pic. In any case, who knows. Thanks.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
74.76 KB |
| Viewed: |
7586 Time(s) |
|
|
|
ruxpriencdiam
Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26840
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 9:57 am
| |
What is the setting you have for the size you are saving images at?
Your super for standard liscense is 4608 x 3456 or 15.9mpx and only has 4.0 MB of information to it where as mine is 9364 x 6050 56.6mpx with 41.1 MB of information.
Either your saving at a smaller size in camera or you are downsizing the files when you upload.
The 5D is if i remember a 21mpx camera and it is only saving a 15mpx image so your setting in the camera for saving the file has to be off.
|
|
pantziaras
Joined: 19 May 2010
Posts: 42
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 12:12 pm
| |
If i got that right, the "Super" size edition is an auto generated resize in case the original ("large") version has dimensions less than 4000 pixels (on its longest side). That means that if you upload a photo that is larger than for example 4000 x 4000 it will not appear as "super". If you upload the same, downsized to 3000 x 3000 it will be resized to super.
|
|
braniffman
Joined: 03 Aug 2009
Posts: 238
Location: Miami
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:07 pm
| |
| ruxpriencdiam wrote: | What is the setting you have for the size you are saving images at?
Your super for standard liscense is 4608 x 3456 or 15.9mpx and only has 4.0 MB of information to it where as mine is 9364 x 6050 56.6mpx with 41.1 MB of information.
Either your saving at a smaller size in camera or you are downsizing the files when you upload.
The 5D is if i remember a 21mpx camera and it is only saving a 15mpx image so your setting in the camera for saving the file has to be off. |
The screen capture from before is not one of my images, I just wanted to show you that the photo doesn't necessarily "have" to be larger in pixels to become a "Large" edition, here's an example of one of mine...
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
111.02 KB |
| Viewed: |
7519 Time(s) |
|
|
|
meirion
Joined: 06 Jul 2010
Posts: 3561
Location: north wales, UK.
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 5:07 pm
| |
braniffman, I think there must be a threshold size beyond which they don't bother offering supersize. My bigger original images don't get supersized. 5DmkII full size files are whoppers to start with so I'm guessing that SS don't feel the need to do the daft upsizing interpolation with them. I may of course be wrong ;)
|
|
braniffman
Joined: 03 Aug 2009
Posts: 238
Location: Miami
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 5:49 pm
| |
| meirion wrote: | | braniffman, I think there must be a threshold size beyond which they don't bother offering supersize. My bigger original images don't get supersized. 5DmkII full size files are whoppers to start with so I'm guessing that SS don't feel the need to do the daft upsizing interpolation with them. I may of course be wrong ;) |
You might be right, I appreciate your input, thank you!
|
|
ruxpriencdiam
Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26840
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 6:08 pm
| |
| braniffman wrote: | | meirion wrote: | | braniffman, I think there must be a threshold size beyond which they don't bother offering supersize. My bigger original images don't get supersized. 5DmkII full size files are whoppers to start with so I'm guessing that SS don't feel the need to do the daft upsizing interpolation with them. I may of course be wrong ;) |
You might be right, I appreciate your input, thank you! |
I dont think this is true because if it were there would be a whole lot of people using a smaller camera because the only way to get an EL (enhanced license) is to have large and super TIFF files and there are a lot of people using the 5D.
|
|
| |
|
Log in
