Welcome, Anonymous (Profile, Private Messages)
Having trouble signing into the forums? Please [ logout ] and log back in.
 Log inLog in 
SEARCH:     » Advanced Search

Shutterstock Photographer Forum Forum Index : Illustrators Forum :
Rough Edges?
Page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic    Reply to topic
Author Message
blahsum


Joined: 18 Sep 2011
Posts: 52
Location: South Africa

Post Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2011 11:59 pm     Reply with quote

Hi

What is meant by 'rough edges'? Initially I uploaded the ten images - all but one were approved. Alas, they were layered TIFFs and couldn't be used. I resubmitted these, plus line versions (I'm a cartoonist) as well as additional pieces.

ALL of them were rejected on the basis of 'Rough edges' (note that at this stage I am approved as a contributor). What does this mean? My art works in hard lines, so there is no anti-aliasing. I wouldn't do this anyway - it diffuses the style I use and makes it that much more work for a designer to isolate a piece.

Is there somewhere I can read up about what exactly the problem is and whether it can be fixed? I also don't get it - there are images of doodle pages on Shutterstock, for goodness sake!

Also, how can the same images that got me approved then be rejected? Isn't that a case of separate standards?

Attached is one of the rejected pictures.

thanks,
James
daemys


Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 2097
Location: Where the president cosplays a white crane

Post Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:25 am     Reply with quote

The acceptance criteria are not formally specified. The only one is reviewer's subjective opinion. Someone might understand your style and technique, another might not.
alexronay


Joined: 23 Nov 2010
Posts: 83
Location: http://alejandroronaydesigns.blogspot.com

Post Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:30 am     Reply with quote

This is what they mean:



Are you scanning your drawings? if so, you need to go over the lines on your computer to make them smooth.

also there is some noise around your lines you need to get rid of.

this is what the noise does when I try to just fill in your drawing with color:



with smooth edges you would be able to fill it in with no problem, and that's what customers need. You can still have a stylized cartoon, just make sure the edges are smooth.

as stated above, some reviewers will pass one thing and others will reject the same picture. For illustrations rough edges is just about the only reason aside from low commercial value that something would get rejected here.


Last edited by alexronay on Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:44 am; edited 1 time in total
apotterdd


Joined: 10 Apr 2009
Posts: 7066
Location: Trying to get my latinum back from Quark

Post Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:44 am     Reply with quote

What exactly are you using to draw your lines with? Is it a brush pattern? Some of those can cause rough edges.

I've gotten that rejection too so you'll definitely need to smooth your lines Alex stated.

It's a really cute illustration otherwise just needs smoother edges.
blahsum


Joined: 18 Sep 2011
Posts: 52
Location: South Africa

Post Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:48 am     Reply with quote

Thank you for the reply :)

The uploaded image has noise because I had to reduce it to fit the upload space. The original is uncompressed and there is no noise. You can fill it without a problem.

Also, this is the line version. There is a color version - which was also rejected. All my art is scanned clean and then processed through both Photoshop and Manga Studio.

I have uploaded a crop of the color version with no compression. As you can see, problems resulting from color-filling, noise and anti-aliased lines do not exist.

Also, as mentioned, some of these images were approved before, but the files did not fall within the SS requirements.
blahsum


Joined: 18 Sep 2011
Posts: 52
Location: South Africa

Post Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:53 am     Reply with quote

apotterdd wrote:
What exactly are you using to draw your lines with? Is it a brush pattern? Some of those can cause rough edges.


No, it's brush on paper, then scanned with Photoshop, after which I process and color it in Manga Studio. The latter tends to vector lines when applying a multiply filter, giving the lines their rough-hewn look.

Still, it's a matter of style, not quality.

Btw, thanks for the compliment!
alexronay


Joined: 23 Nov 2010
Posts: 83
Location: http://alejandroronaydesigns.blogspot.com

Post Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 1:01 am     Reply with quote

blahsum wrote:
Thank you for the reply :)

The uploaded image has noise because I had to reduce it to fit the upload space. The original is uncompressed and there is no noise. You can fill it without a problem.

Also, this is the line version. There is a color version - which was also rejected. All my art is scanned clean and then processed through both Photoshop and Manga Studio.

I have uploaded a crop of the color version with no compression. As you can see, problems resulting from color-filling, noise and anti-aliased lines do not exist.

Also, as mentioned, some of these images were approved before, but the files did not fall within the SS requirements.


the image I'm seeing still has rough edges, it might be from the reduction.



In the image above you can see I split it in two parts. On the left of the red line is your original, and on the right is the smoothed out version. I'm using Serif drawplus x4 which has a trace feature. It makes all of the edges smooth, I'm sure your programs do also. After you scan them and reduce them to size, smooth out the lines before you save it.

I agree about the style over quality for this type of stuff, but you have to understand that the stock world is not like that. You have to produce work that the consumer can work with.


Last edited by alexronay on Fri Sep 30, 2011 1:03 am; edited 1 time in total
apotterdd


Joined: 10 Apr 2009
Posts: 7066
Location: Trying to get my latinum back from Quark

Post Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 1:02 am     Reply with quote

Oh okay I wasn't realizing that it was scanned artwork. Are you reworking the lines in Photoshop or leaving as is?

I do this but in Illustrator. I scan my artwork and place it then lock the layer and make a new layer. That's where I'll go and do my outlining. Ya got the software might as well use it to your advantage.

Yeah it is a matter of style but stock agencies hate rough edges if they didn't we'd never see those types of rejections.

And yer welcome ;)
alexronay


Joined: 23 Nov 2010
Posts: 83
Location: http://alejandroronaydesigns.blogspot.com

Post Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 1:05 am     Reply with quote

apotterdd wrote:
Oh okay I wasn't realizing that it was scanned artwork. Are you reworking the lines in Photoshop or leaving as is?

I do this but in Illustrator. I scan my artwork and place it then lock the layer and make a new layer. That's where I'll go and do my outlining. Ya got the software might as well use it to your advantage.

Yeah it is a matter of style but stock agencies hate rough edges if they didn't we'd never see those types of rejections.

And yer welcome ;)


Doing so doesn't take away from the style either. The image I posted with smooth lines still has the style aspect.
blahsum


Joined: 18 Sep 2011
Posts: 52
Location: South Africa

Post Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 1:15 am     Reply with quote

Fine, I'll smooth the edges.

But it still doesn't make sense to me because my images - including this one - were approved in the initial batch of 10.

One thing I can do is to scan the art at 300 percent, color it, then reduce it, thus eliminating the line problem since the lines will all be anti-aliased. Alas, I can already hear the moans of a thousand designers reaching for the pen tool...
alexronay


Joined: 23 Nov 2010
Posts: 83
Location: http://alejandroronaydesigns.blogspot.com

Post Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 1:20 am     Reply with quote

blahsum wrote:


But it still doesn't make sense to me because my images - including this one - were approved in the initial batch of 10.



Unfortunately this is not a new issue. Try what you can, once you are in they have more leeway to what is accepted from you... plus you don't have to wait 30 days to upload again.

Good luck, your style is appreciated here and will do well.
blahsum


Joined: 18 Sep 2011
Posts: 52
Location: South Africa

Post Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 1:25 am     Reply with quote

alexronay wrote:

Good luck, your style is appreciated here and will do well.


Thanks, but I might have a real problem here. So far nothing in Photoshop is doing the smoothing you have shown - not unless it thickens the lines by 2 pixels, which really over-bolds the entire composition.

I'll see if I can find a fix in Photoshop, but I suspect my time is better spent focusing on other stock sites.

Also, it is stupid that SS does not accept layered TIFFs or PNGs. PSDs I can understand, due to copyright issues, but no other layered files? Do they think all designers still use Quark?
alexronay


Joined: 23 Nov 2010
Posts: 83
Location: http://alejandroronaydesigns.blogspot.com

Post Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 1:29 am     Reply with quote

blahsum wrote:
alexronay wrote:

Good luck, your style is appreciated here and will do well.


Thanks, but I might have a real problem here. So far nothing in Photoshop is doing the smoothing you have shown - not unless it thickens the lines by 2 pixels, which really over-bolds the entire composition.

I'll see if I can find a fix in Photoshop, but I suspect my time is better spent focusing on other stock sites.

Also, it is stupid that SS does not accept layered TIFFs or PNGs. PSDs I can understand, due to copyright issues, but no other layered files? Do they think all designers still use Quark?


programs are programs, on my blog I have illustrations that I've uploaded to stock sites that I actually made on powerpoint lol.

If all of your images are similar to this, I'd say you might want to try other sites. If you have other work that you can submit, I'd try that in its place and upload these later once you are in.
blahsum


Joined: 18 Sep 2011
Posts: 52
Location: South Africa

Post Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 1:34 am     Reply with quote

alexronay wrote:
If you have other work that you can submit, I'd try that in its place and upload these later once you are in.


Except I am already 'in'. Instead I am having no luck with acceptance after the fact (a theme I notice across several forum posts here). Why was I approved if my style is not accepted at all? 24 out of 24 images were rejected! And, no, sadly this is my style. It would have been nice for SS to have just rejected me off the bat instead of wasting my time like this, since if these 24 images didn't make the cut, none of my work will.

Sorry, I'm just really disappointed and upset right now. Also, I have absolutely no faith in the approval system, since it appears to be totally subjective. For all I know the reviewer was jealous.
apotterdd


Joined: 10 Apr 2009
Posts: 7066
Location: Trying to get my latinum back from Quark

Post Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2011 1:48 am     Reply with quote

Most of us use Photoshop, Illustrator and Ink Scape. Most submit either eps files or large jpgs or both.

SS doesn't accept tiffs because they use a program to convert them into tiffs from the jpgs that are accepted. I'm sure a lot would love to have the option of layerd PSD files and I'm sure there might be a market for it. Not sure if anyone accepts psd files.

Whatever you decide to do it's ultimately your decision. No one's telling you that your style won't work just the edges of that artwork need to be smoother.
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 3 All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1, 2, 3  Next

 


Shutterstock Forum for Contributors