| Author |
Message |
alexosbourn
Joined: 10 Dec 2011
Posts: 25
|
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 4:16 pm
| |
Hi, I apologize in advance, I want to learn as much as I can about photography, as well as stock. So I'm planning to post often for critique... at least until I am comfortable enough with my photos to send in an initial 10.
Here are two photos. The first is my neighbor's horse, and the second is a holly bush. Fire away please and thanks. =]
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
107.02 KB |
| Viewed: |
1009 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
105.6 KB |
| Viewed: |
1009 Time(s) |

|
|
|
alexosbourn
Joined: 10 Dec 2011
Posts: 25
|
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 4:17 pm
| |
Here are the Holly photos.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
88.74 KB |
| Viewed: |
1004 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
59.33 KB |
| Viewed: |
1004 Time(s) |

|
|
|
semmickphoto

Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 6632
Location: Stuck between a shutter and a hard place
|
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 4:19 pm
| |
The horse is too far away in the shot. If the horse is the subject it needs to be prominent in the frame. Its also too soft, OOF. The photo also lacks punch, vividness.
|
|
semmickphoto

Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 6632
Location: Stuck between a shutter and a hard place
|
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 4:27 pm
| |
Holly is out of focus. I would also zoom in on the berries, if they are the subject.
|
|
alexosbourn
Joined: 10 Dec 2011
Posts: 25
|
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 4:36 pm
| |
Thanks! If I re-shoot the horse shot, do you think that something like this would be better?
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
76.76 KB |
| Viewed: |
983 Time(s) |

|
|
|
semmickphoto

Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 6632
Location: Stuck between a shutter and a hard place
|
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 4:42 pm
| |
| alexosbourn wrote: | | Thanks! If I re-shoot the horse shot, do you think that something like this would be better? | Yes, but dont position the horse in the middle.
|
|
alexosbourn
Joined: 10 Dec 2011
Posts: 25
|
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 4:53 pm
| |
Gotcha... keep some rule of thirds in there for now.
|
|
mikenorton

Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 3566
Location: Guide Book http://www.lulu.com/shop/mike-norton/nortons-notes/paperback/product-5079819.html
|
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:27 pm
| |
Mike Norton's First Rule of Landscape Photography: There is always one too many or one too few trees.
Do you see the one too many tree in the picture of the horse? Actually there may be 3 too many but the number doesn't matter. If you shoot from a tripod you can take the time to study the composition through the viewfinder and by looking at the subject. This is when you will notice the dead trees and can recompose so that they are not in the composition.
|
|
alexosbourn
Joined: 10 Dec 2011
Posts: 25
|
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 7:05 pm
| |
Thanks for pointing that out. As soon as you mentioned that, I also saw the random fence post as well as some debris behind the horse. What about the dead stick laying in the foreground? Would something like that be an issue in stock? ...or photography in general?
|
|
jeffbanke

Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17518
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 12:38 pm
| |
| alexosbourn wrote: | | Thanks for pointing that out. As soon as you mentioned that, I also saw the random fence post as well as some debris behind the horse. What about the dead stick laying in the foreground? Would something like that be an issue in stock? ...or photography in general? |
Yes, all are unnecessary elements in the image!
Jeff's #1 Rule to composition is - If it does not contribute to the image, it does not belong.
|
|
alexosbourn
Joined: 10 Dec 2011
Posts: 25
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 12:55 am
| |
Thanks for the advice. I feel a contributor's #1 rule topic would be a great addition to the tips section. =]
|
|
semmickphoto

Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 6632
Location: Stuck between a shutter and a hard place
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:13 pm
| |
| alexosbourn wrote: | | Thanks for the advice. I feel a contributor's #1 rule topic would be a great addition to the tips section. =] |
+1
|
|
geoffwnz
Joined: 10 Feb 2012
Posts: 174
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 2:32 pm
| |
| semmickphoto wrote: | | alexosbourn wrote: | | Thanks for the advice. I feel a contributor's #1 rule topic would be a great addition to the tips section. =] |
+1 |
There'd be so many #1 rules it'd be crazy. :-)
|
|
rinder99

Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39657
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 8:50 pm
| |
I try to break them whenever possible, Only problem is you have to know them before you can break them.My #1 rule is "Make it yours, Not a derivative of someone else."
|
|
alexosbourn
Joined: 10 Dec 2011
Posts: 25
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 2:25 am
| |
Nice. I have much to learn. I have probably taken a total of 6-7k photos in my lifetime. haha.
|
|
| |
|