| Author |
Message |
michaely
Joined: 15 Nov 2011
Posts: 7
Location: Renfrewshire, Scotland
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:47 am
| |
As a "newbie" I'd appreciate comments on the images posted - thanks.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
48.39 KB |
| Viewed: |
1135 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
49.77 KB |
| Viewed: |
1135 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
57.09 KB |
| Viewed: |
1135 Time(s) |

|
|
|
jhuls

Joined: 02 Jan 2012
Posts: 1055
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:49 am
| |
We can't really help you much without the crops but even without the crops I think you might have a problem with composition and also LCV.
I can tell you the middle one is a no go even without the crops it is full of noise and the lighting is wrong.
oops noticed it was the crop, then the bottom one is a no go because of noise and oof.
|
|
jeffbanke

Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17515
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:07 pm
| |
Agreed, the second too noisy, the first doesn't satisfy compositionally, and we need to see 100%
|
|
digigandalf

Joined: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 5450
Location: Twinsburg, OH
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:07 pm
| |
The middle one is the crop from the bottom image. But it is full of noise, not in focus, and underexposed (even for a moody effect).
When you hit your limit of 3 images per post, just hit "Post Reply" and add up to 3 more images each time. That way the crop from the top image can be included. Compositionally, the tree would look better like this (although bare trees are a dime a dozen):
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
36.02 KB |
| Viewed: |
1086 Time(s) |

|
|
|
mikenorton

Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 3564
Location: Guide Book http://www.lulu.com/shop/mike-norton/nortons-notes/paperback/product-5079819.html
|
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:56 pm
| |
I'm going to respectfully disagree with digigandalf about the IMGP2128snowcloud.jpg picture being too dark. You have detail in the shadows and the highlights are not blown out, that's all you can ask for. I don't like the branches on the left. It's right over the brightest part of the clouds. I wish you would have moved down the road so that branches would not have been in the picture.
|
|
jeffbanke

Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17515
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 12:05 am
| |
I am going to point out to Mike that it is rather a moot point, since the image is both OOF and noisy :-)
|
|
michaely
Joined: 15 Nov 2011
Posts: 7
Location: Renfrewshire, Scotland
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:01 am
| |
Thanks for the comments ono my first submissions - appreciate the time taken to comment. Here is another image and crop.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
110.32 KB |
| Viewed: |
977 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
97.31 KB |
| Viewed: |
977 Time(s) |

|
|
|
michaely
Joined: 15 Nov 2011
Posts: 7
Location: Renfrewshire, Scotland
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:04 am
| |
A slightly different image this time
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
84.56 KB |
| Viewed: |
972 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
110.35 KB |
| Viewed: |
972 Time(s) |

|
|
|
michaely
Joined: 15 Nov 2011
Posts: 7
Location: Renfrewshire, Scotland
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:06 am
| |
A summer image this time. The dog is intentionally out of focus in the background.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
93.8 KB |
| Viewed: |
964 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
123.38 KB |
| Viewed: |
964 Time(s) |

|
|
|
okiepony

Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Posts: 15576
Location: Finally There! :)
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:41 am
| |
The pony is absolutely adorable, but it's OOF, you should be able to see the individual mane hairs in your crop clearly and not just as a general blur of white hairs.
I hope you can go back and reshoot - a cute pony with a gorgeous mane like that would have CV.
Also - don't place the subject right in the middle of the pic, remember the rule of thirds.
In your flower pic the stamens should be sharp. The background does not make the image any better, either.
|
|
hhltdave5

Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24302
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 9:46 am
| |
I agree, focus is the main issue. Exactly what methods are you using for focusing? Are you going manual? Auto? Spot focus? Are you using a tripod or if handheld is your shutter speed at least 3 times the focal length of the lens?
|
|
michaely
Joined: 15 Nov 2011
Posts: 7
Location: Renfrewshire, Scotland
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 11:13 am
| |
Sadly no chance to reshoot - was taken on holiday.
Re comment on focus, these pics were handheld on autofocus.
Comments really appreciated - thanks.
|
|
mikenorton

Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 3564
Location: Guide Book http://www.lulu.com/shop/mike-norton/nortons-notes/paperback/product-5079819.html
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 6:24 pm
| |
| jeffbanke wrote: | | I am going to point out to Mike that it is rather a moot point, since the image is both OOF and noisy :-) |
That's right, I think it is an OOF and noisy, good exposure. I should have added more to my explanation. I wanted to point out that sometimes there is one part of a picture that is good and a whole bunch of parts that are bad. The one good part does not trump the many bad parts, but it is one less thing to be corrected in the future.
|
|
markrhiggins
Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 2040
Location: Australia
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:00 pm
| |
look for the picture in the scene. Do not just snap the whole thing. Learn to correct your CA and WB. Here is a little portion of one one your images. Consider the composition and how it may be used. It has to be more than a holiday record.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
48.64 KB |
| Viewed: |
827 Time(s) |

|
|
|
| |
|