| Author |
Message |
dailin
Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Posts: 16
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:21 pm
| |
ah!all the initial 10 image are reject.
Bad luck!!
These image are the best seller on my other agency.
all reject by:
Composition--Limited commercial value due to framing, cropping, and/or composition. Please see Shutterbuzz for more info
I am new to shutterstock,does shutterstock reviewer's mood is not good at latest time?☺☺☺☺☺☺
wow,I must waitting 30 days![/url]
| Description: |
|
 Download |
| Filename: |
.jpg |
| Filesize: |
64.19 KB |
| Downloaded: |
180 Time(s) |
Last edited by dailin on Sat Mar 03, 2012 5:17 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
ruxpriencdiam

Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26249
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:25 pm
| |
| dailin wrote: | ah!all the initial 10 image are reject.
Bad luck!!
These image are the best seller on my other agency.
all reject by:
Composition--Limited commercial value due to framing, cropping, and/or composition. Please see Shutterbuzz for more info
wow,I must waitting 30 days![/url] | Yep thirty days.
That's what this forum is here to help you with now if you read the top thread in this forum it explains how to post your images for critique.
SS standards have gone up over the past few years and what other sites take doesn't mean anything.
|
|
rinder99

Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39182
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 8:30 pm
| |
Matter of Fact. I know 4 or 5 that take anything. But, No Sales. Post them here.
|
|
kenny123

Joined: 13 Aug 2005
Posts: 6079
Location: Masterton,Wairarapa, New Zealand
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 11:02 pm
| |
| dailin wrote: | ah!all the initial 10 image are reject.
Bad luck!!
These image are the best seller on my other agency.
all reject by:
Composition--Limited commercial value due to framing, cropping, and/or composition. Please see Shutterbuzz for more info
I am new to shutterstock,does shutterstock reviewer's mood is not good at latest time?☺☺☺☺☺☺
wow,I must waitting 30 days![/url] |
show your rejects
|
|
jeffbanke

Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17463
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 12:26 am
| |
Yes Shutterstock is more selective than some of the also rands
|
|
dailin
Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Posts: 16
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 5:18 am
| |
continue.
| Description: |
|
 Download |
| Filename: |
QQ截图20120303181511.png |
| Filesize: |
101.42 KB |
| Downloaded: |
193 Time(s) |
|
|
dailin
Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Posts: 16
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 5:19 am
| |
continue2
| Description: |
|
 Download |
| Filename: |
QQ截图20120303181526.png |
| Filesize: |
138.39 KB |
| Downloaded: |
159 Time(s) |
|
|
dailin
Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Posts: 16
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 5:19 am
| |
continue3
| Description: |
|
 Download |
| Filename: |
QQ截图20120303181537.png |
| Filesize: |
31.47 KB |
| Downloaded: |
148 Time(s) |
|
|
dailin
Joined: 17 Feb 2012
Posts: 16
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 5:21 am
| |
these files are best seller on my other angency.
I am sure they are focus well and clear on 100%.
I do not know how to improve these pictures as they all refused by:
Composition--Limited commercial value due to framing, cropping, and/or composition. Please see Shutterbuzz for more info
this rejection reason mean these photo at shutterstock is too much?
|
|
fraochm
Joined: 22 Feb 2012
Posts: 5
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 5:43 am
| |
I am in the same boat, most of my images have been rejected due to composition, yet I don't agree, as I believe my composition is fine in at least 5 of my images (composition is really an opinion). You said you are using another website to sell, which one is this and are you seeing decent sales?
|
|
semmickphoto

Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 6482
Location: Stuck between a shutter and a hard place
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 6:56 am
| |
To me composition seems fine, I think the LCV is more the problem. You have buildings, cars and interiors in your photos that need releases and or are protected. Also your selective colouring might be an issue for your first 10. For what I understand is that the reviewers have standard reasons for rejection and they might not always match the actual reason for rejection.
Anyhoo, wait for the pros to comment, thats just my humble amateur two cents.
|
|
ruxpriencdiam

Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26249
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:07 am
| |
You posted thumbnails so no need to comment until we see the actual shot and the 100% crop.
|
|
hhltdave5

Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24070
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 8:15 am
| |
First of all you have to post them correctly. We cannot give a good critique just by looking at the little thumbnails you get with the rejection notice. Post the shots individually by following the instructions found in the first post.
From what I can see from the thumbnails you posted several of the shots are of single buildings or where one building is dominant in the shot. This is something that Shutterstock does not accept.
You also have a car in one shot which again is not allowed (much of this is covered in Shutterbuzz under the restricted image section).
Some of the other shots show composition problems that are often found when doing architectural shots such as the lines of the structures looking like they are falling in.
Other shots such as the power line tower have been done to death years ago and Shutterstock is no longer accepting them unless they are done very very well.
The composition rejection is not necessarily because the overall composition is bad, it can have several reasons for the problem.
As mentioned Shutterstock is not like other sites that will accept just about anything and different stock sites have different standards and rules dealing with what is accepted. That is why we suggest posting the shots you want to submit in the Critique forum so we can give you some suggestions and guidance.
As far as waiting 30 days you are lucky. Years back when many of us started it was a 90 day wait.
|
|
rinder99

Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39182
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 12:23 pm
| |
I agree with the reviewer and why the blue cast on everything? You have composition,WB and copyright issues.
|
|
h1nksy

Joined: 04 Feb 2012
Posts: 16
Location: Afghanistan ~ Now back in Blightly for a while :)
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:26 pm
| |
The thing is most people are biast to their own Photos/footage. I had many a photo declined on here but I take the criticism on board and try to improve for the future, you just have to roll with the punches.
|
|
| |
|