| Author |
Message |
voodoo13
Joined: 18 Jul 2011
Posts: 35
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:31 am
|  |
http://www.shutterstock.com/pic.mhtml?id=96684511
"Editorial Use Only. Use of this image in advertising or for promotional purposes is prohibited."
Please, tell me why? As the author of this image, I absolutely agree with using this image in advertising. Will i need to check some option for this image? |
|
hhltdave5
Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24305
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 12:01 pm
| |
| voodoo13 wrote: | http://www.shutterstock.com/pic.mhtml?id=96684511
"Editorial Use Only. Use of this image in advertising or for promotional purposes is prohibited."
Please, tell me why? As the author of this image, I absolutely agree with using this image in advertising. Will i need to check some option for this image? |
I really do not know what is going on with this image. If you did not send it in as an editorial image and the reviewer thinks it should have been it would have been rejected for incorrect titling.
It seems as if you are saying that the reviewer accepted it and added the editorial license agreement onto it.
I would write to them and ask what is going on. |
|
voodoo13
Joined: 18 Jul 2011
Posts: 35
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 12:15 pm
| |
Yes, this image is approved as you see. And i'm sure, i don't check anything before sending for review, just fill name, keywords and categories.
I watch now for a 10 vectors of bulb lamp on site, they all don't have this limitation.
About mailing to reviewers - I have anther one question abut other image, and sent e-mail about month ago, but i still waiting for answer. |
|
hhltdave5
Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24305
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 12:27 pm
| |
| voodoo13 wrote: | Yes, this image is approved as you see. And i'm sure, i don't check anything before sending for review, just fill name, keywords and categories.
I watch now for a 10 vectors of bulb lamp on site, they all don't have this limitation.
About mailing to reviewers - I have anther one question abut other image, and sent e-mail about month ago, but i still waiting for answer. |
Then I don't understand what happened. I have not seen a reviewer approve a non editorial submitted image and change it to an editorial one. They will rejected it if they feel it is editorial and have you fill in the proper editorial description.
What address did you write to? Write them at submit@shutterstock.com |
|
voodoo13
Joined: 18 Jul 2011
Posts: 35
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 1:05 pm
| |
Thank you, i'll do it |
|
ch4x4
Joined: 02 Jun 2011
Posts: 772
Location: Montreal, Canada
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:18 pm
| |
The following 3 images in your port are also editorial use only with the mention
Editorial Credit:
VooDoo13 / Shutterstock.com
They're all new images. Maybe you checked a wrong box when you submitted them.
 |
|
hhltdave5
Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24305
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:55 pm
| |
| ch4x4 wrote: | The following 3 images in your port are also editorial use only with the mention
Editorial Credit:
VooDoo13 / Shutterstock.com
They're all new images. Maybe you checked a wrong box when you submitted them.
|
Could be but that does not answer why the reviewer accepted them as editorial without the proper editorial caption and newsworthiness. That is something they have been very picky about. |
|
ch4x4
Joined: 02 Jun 2011
Posts: 772
Location: Montreal, Canada
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 5:00 pm
| |
| hhltdave5 wrote: |
Could be but that does not answer why the reviewer accepted them as editorial without the proper editorial caption and newsworthiness. That is something they have been very picky about. |
You're right Dave (as usual). Very bizarre. Maybe it's the reviewer who checked the wrong box? |
|
voodoo13
Joined: 18 Jul 2011
Posts: 35
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 12:15 pm
| |
After all this days I still didn't receive answer from Shutter.
Admin's, please help to decide this situation. |
|
hhltdave5
Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24305
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 12:20 pm
| |
| voodoo13 wrote: | After all this days I still didn't receive answer from Shutter.
Admin's, please help to decide this situation. |
Write them again. If they haven't answered yet then your email probably got sidetracked or buried somewhere. Make sure you write to submit@shutterstock.com |
|
voodoo13
Joined: 18 Jul 2011
Posts: 35
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 12:01 pm
| |
| hhltdave5 wrote: |
Write them again. If they haven't answered yet then your email probably got sidetracked or buried somewhere. Make sure you write to submit@shutterstock.com |
Re: [Ticket#2012040210000742] Editorial Use andrejection
Submit Support <submit@shutterstock.com>
Hello,
Thank you for your message. We have forwarded your ticket to the appropriate
department. Our colleagues will contact you.
Thank you for your patience.
Best regards,
Do you think I need to write them again? |
|
shutterstocknjb
Joined: 14 Jul 2009
Posts: 2
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:34 am
| |
I have found Shutterstock is very bad dealing with editorial images. They are expecting hard news editorial that would be appropriate for a wire service - but they are not a wire service! Editorial does NOT need to be about a newsworthy event - editorial is not just about news - it can be about education or information. Its a pity. I won't waste any more time submitting here. |
|
hhltdave5
Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24305
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 12:24 pm
| |
| shutterstocknjb wrote: | | I have found Shutterstock is very bad dealing with editorial images. They are expecting hard news editorial that would be appropriate for a wire service - but they are not a wire service! Editorial does NOT need to be about a newsworthy event - editorial is not just about news - it can be about education or information. Its a pity. I won't waste any more time submitting here. |
There is the general definition of editorial as far as newsworthiness goes and then there is the one that Shutterstock uses in their policies and guidelines. They do not have to follow the general definition of it. If they want newsworthiness as part of the definition for the images they sell then that is that. |
|
warrenprice
Joined: 15 Dec 2009
Posts: 429
Location: Central Texas
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:13 pm
| |
| hhltdave5 wrote: | | shutterstocknjb wrote: | | I have found Shutterstock is very bad dealing with editorial images. They are expecting hard news editorial that would be appropriate for a wire service - but they are not a wire service! Editorial does NOT need to be about a newsworthy event - editorial is not just about news - it can be about education or information. Its a pity. I won't waste any more time submitting here. |
There is the general definition of editorial as far as newsworthiness goes and then there is the one that Shutterstock uses in their policies and guidelines. They do not have to follow the general definition of it. If they want newsworthiness as part of the definition for the images they sell then that is that. |
Yep "that is that" and it is a shame. I've been having pretty good sales with my "less than current Newsworthy" images. |
|
Mike Price
Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 2933
Location: South Wales
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:23 pm
| |
Just resubmit them again as illustrations and see if they get accepted. If they do delete the editorial ones. My guess is you accidentally ticked the editorial box.
Mike |
|
| |
|
Log in
