Welcome, Anonymous (Profile, Private Messages)
Having trouble signing into the forums? Please [ logout ] and log back in.
 Log inLog in 
SEARCH:     » Advanced Search

Shutterstock Photographer Forum Forum Index : Critique / Tips / Tricks :
Critique Please
Page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic    Reply to topic
Author Message
cpaulfell


Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 2422

Post Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 12:36 pm     Reply with quote

I have never shot one of these before so all critique is most welcome.

I tried doing a search for panoramic views and there are just not many out there. Besides the images are all way to small for my eyes so they just don't help any.

Some EXIF info:

ExposureTime : 1/60Sec
FNumber : F11.0
ExposureProgram : Aperture Priority
ISOSpeedRatings : 100
ApertureValue : F11.3
ExposureBiasValue : 0/1
MaxApertureValue : F6.2
MeteringMode : Division
Flash : Not fired(Compulsory)
FocalLength : 133.00(mm)
ColorSpace : sRGB
ExposureMode : Auto
WhiteBalance : Auto
SceneCaptureType : Standard



2_3252.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  192.07 KB
 Viewed:  1140 Time(s)

2_3252.jpg



1_3252.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  69.55 KB
 Viewed:  1140 Time(s)

1_3252.jpg


ruxpriencdiam


Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26256
Location: Third Stone from the Sun

Post Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 12:56 pm     Reply with quote

It is OOF and the lighting is uneven also take the camera off of AP and set it on manual.
rinder99


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39212
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder

Post Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 12:57 pm     Reply with quote

It's very OOF. YOU MUST use a tripod when doing Panos. and If you do. Shoot them vertically and overlap by 20% ON A TRIPOD.
nadger


Joined: 13 Sep 2009
Posts: 259
Location: God only knows

Post Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 12:59 pm     Reply with quote

Hi

Crop looks soft and it's difficult to see what the gist of the image is. Assuming you have stitched several images here, for a successful panorama there are a few key points: 1) use a tripod 2) lock focus (or use manual) so it doesn't change between images 3) lock exposure (or use manual)so it doesn't change between images.

Viewing at this size, the image seems flat - no foreground interest to give it depth.
cpaulfell


Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 2422

Post Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:07 pm     Reply with quote

Thanks for all the advice, much appreciated.

rinder99 wrote:
Shoot them vertically and overlap by 20% ON A TRIPOD.
I never thought of shooting vertically and will give it a try. What is the reason BTW for shooting vertically?

The OOF is due to a very poor substandard tripod. I have a new one on my shopping list. Hopefully something that will do the job but not break the bank neither. I was thinking of maybe something like this http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/523086-REG/Manfrotto_055XDB_Tripod_Legs_Black.html Care to comment?

nadger wrote:
Crop looks soft and it's difficult to see what the gist of the image is.
I am not sure what you mean by "Crop looks soft"? The photo is a panoramic view of the City of Everett with the Everett naval base in the foreground showing the USS Nimitz on the right.
jeffbanke


Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17463
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California

Post Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 12:08 am     Reply with quote

The reason for shooting vertically is that it gives you more image to play with, if you need to content aware fill or crop or both it gives you greater flexibility, and shooting panos horizontally end up very wide, and very short.
hhltdave5


Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24081
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com

Post Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:03 am     Reply with quote

cpaulfell wrote:
Thanks for all the advice, much appreciated.

rinder99 wrote:
Shoot them vertically and overlap by 20% ON A TRIPOD.
I never thought of shooting vertically and will give it a try. What is the reason BTW for shooting vertically?

The OOF is due to a very poor substandard tripod. I have a new one on my shopping list. Hopefully something that will do the job but not break the bank neither. I was thinking of maybe something like this http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/523086-REG/Manfrotto_055XDB_Tripod_Legs_Black.html Care to comment?

nadger wrote:
Crop looks soft and it's difficult to see what the gist of the image is.
I am not sure what you mean by "Crop looks soft"? The photo is a panoramic view of the City of Everett with the Everett naval base in the foreground showing the USS Nimitz on the right.


The "crop looking soft" means that you can see when looking at the cropped version that the focus is not as sharp and in focus as it should be.
mauijon


Joined: 02 Mar 2005
Posts: 4279
Location: Maui, Hawaii

Post Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 5:24 pm     Reply with quote

Another reason for shooting verticals for a pano is that a lens (especially a wa) has more visible distortion on the sides when shot horizontally, so it is harder to match up the edges when making the panorama.

If you do vertical shots the distortion is on the upper and lower edges when you piece them together, so it's not as noticeable and doesn't cause mathup problems.
rinder99


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39212
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder

Post Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:01 pm     Reply with quote

Heres my 9 shot stitched Vertical pano Of Kilauea volcano on Hawaii. full file size is 20,000+ on the wide side. can make a print about 8 ft wide.


CAT 8271 CD299 KILAUEA VOLCANO 2.jpg
 Description:

Download
 Filename:  CAT 8271 CD299 KILAUEA VOLCANO 2.jpg
 Filesize:  70.04 KB
 Downloaded:  85 Time(s)

jeffbanke


Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17463
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California

Post Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 10:01 pm     Reply with quote

These were all done vertically





cpaulfell


Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 2422

Post Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 12:01 am     Reply with quote

Lovely, thanks guys :) indeed something to aspire towards.
jeffbanke


Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17463
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California

Post Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 12:18 am     Reply with quote

Glad to help :-)

As I said about shooting pano's horizontally, I have one that is about 10ft long and only about 7 inches high, useless for anything other than a wallpaper room border.
By comparison the previously posted pano's are far more useful.
rinder99


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39212
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder

Post Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 12:21 am     Reply with quote

Mine was done for a clients living room.That lives in Hawaii.Done and shipped.Ka Ching.
rinder99


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39212
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder

Post Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 12:22 am     Reply with quote

Mine was done for a clients living room.That lives in Hawaii.Done and shipped.Ka Ching.10ft X 25in.
dustine


Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 925
Location: You're in my viewfinder...

Post Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 3:41 am     Reply with quote

WOW! Stunning panos guys! I will always shoot panos vertically after seeing these.
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 2 All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1, 2  Next

 


Shutterstock Forum for Contributors