Welcome, Anonymous (Profile, Private Messages)
Having trouble signing into the forums? Please [ logout ] and log back in.
 Log inLog in 
SEARCH:     » Advanced Search

Shutterstock Photographer Forum Forum Index : Critique / Tips / Tricks :
New attempts. Please, critique.
Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic    Reply to topic
Author Message
savagelioness


Joined: 06 Feb 2010
Posts: 38

Post Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:27 am     Reply with quote

Hello again. Here are some new attempts, this time without the light box. What do you think?


corrected1.jpg
 Description:
M 1/50 F5.6 ISO100 92mm WB cloudy
 Filesize:  153.4 KB
 Viewed:  1332 Time(s)

corrected1.jpg



crop100%1.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  45.33 KB
 Viewed:  1332 Time(s)

crop100%1.jpg


savagelioness


Joined: 06 Feb 2010
Posts: 38

Post Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:29 am     Reply with quote

Ant this one.


corrected3_1725.jpg
 Description:
M 1/40 F6.3 ISO100 85mm; WB sunny
 Filesize:  132.27 KB
 Viewed:  1327 Time(s)

corrected3_1725.jpg



corrected3_100%.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  40.81 KB
 Viewed:  1327 Time(s)

corrected3_100%.jpg


ruxpriencdiam


Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26254
Location: Third Stone from the Sun

Post Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:36 am     Reply with quote

Crops show they are OOF (soft).
markrhiggins


Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 1996
Location: Australia

Post Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:39 am     Reply with quote

Not sure what the concept is. The two pegs would be better with a white background. Looks a little soft in crop but no exif data. What were the settings and why would it sell if technically ok?

Second image, again same thoughts and why the rough cutout? What would it be used for?
jeffbanke


Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17463
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California

Post Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 10:19 am     Reply with quote

markrhiggins wrote:
Not sure what the concept is. The two pegs would be better with a white background. Looks a little soft in crop but no exif data. What were the settings and why would it sell if technically ok?

Second image, again same thoughts and why the rough cutout? What would it be used for?

Just to add to Barry and Mark's comments, - Soft, no attention to details and concept?
savagelioness


Joined: 06 Feb 2010
Posts: 38

Post Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 10:26 am     Reply with quote

Didn't think much about the CV. Just trying to achieve technical improvement and improvized. I didn't use tripod this time. Thought the focus was ok, but now I see it isn't. Strange, the crop files looked much better before sumbitting them here.

I do have another series with a tripod. Will post them soon.

The exif data is in the description of both files.
markrhiggins


Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 1996
Location: Australia

Post Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:07 am     Reply with quote

"The exif data is in the description of both files."

I can't see it using firefox plugin
cpaulfell


Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 2417

Post Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:11 am     Reply with quote

markrhiggins wrote:
"The exif data is in the description of both files."

I can't see it using firefox plugin



Untitled.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  50.9 KB
 Viewed:  1276 Time(s)

Untitled.jpg


ruxpriencdiam


Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26254
Location: Third Stone from the Sun

Post Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:19 am     Reply with quote

This is what Mark means.


DATA.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  37.35 KB
 Viewed:  1263 Time(s)

DATA.jpg


jhuls


Joined: 02 Jan 2012
Posts: 1046

Post Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 11:42 am     Reply with quote

You have a bit of camera distortion, notice the curve to all the images. What lens are you using. Camera distortion can be a big pain if you are trying to get things all strait especially when you are working with converging right angles.
rinder99


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39191
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder

Post Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:45 pm     Reply with quote

I have no clue where your going with these? And yes they are OOF.
jeffbanke


Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17463
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California

Post Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 1:10 pm     Reply with quote

The backgrounds are also distracting, so before you try anything alse, get yourself a large white background, (a white sheet or foam board) to eliminate any distraction
markrhiggins


Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 1996
Location: Australia

Post Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:54 pm     Reply with quote

get your lens closed down to f8, white background and tripod. All this will help but choose a commercial easy to understand subject.
savagelioness


Joined: 06 Feb 2010
Posts: 38

Post Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:54 pm     Reply with quote

The Lense is Nikkor 18-105. Thought the background could be anything as long as it's blurred enough. Do I have to isolate the objects every time in postproduction? Please, give an example of suitable backgrounds that are not white-white.

Rinder, I am not working on concepts yet. Hope to come to that soon.

Here's another attempt. Please, ignore again the CV. Just picked some random objects at home. This time used a tripod and only the sun coming from the window at the back. Tried to add a fixture as well, but didn't like the result.

Is it sharp enough this time? I use a pure white background and table cover. They don't look enough white at the picture though. How do I process them in PS whithout losing details? Or maybe it's just a question of using the right WB.

Thanks for your time.



DSC_1778.jpg
 Description:
Nikon D90, F 4.8; 1/6 sec.; 42 mm, no flash
 Filesize:  21.65 KB
 Viewed:  1187 Time(s)

DSC_1778.jpg



DSC_1778_crop2.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  12.04 KB
 Viewed:  1187 Time(s)

DSC_1778_crop2.jpg



DSC_1778_crop.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  6.75 KB
 Viewed:  1187 Time(s)

DSC_1778_crop.jpg


markrhiggins


Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Posts: 1996
Location: Australia

Post Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:01 pm     Reply with quote

like I said close down the lens. Trying to blur background with opened up lens is giving narrow DOF and soft image (soft part of lens).
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 5 All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

 


Shutterstock Forum for Contributors