Welcome, Anonymous (Profile, Private Messages)
Having trouble signing into the forums? Please [ logout ] and log back in.
 Log inLog in 
SEARCH:     » Advanced Search

Shutterstock Photographer Forum Forum Index : Critique / Tips / Tricks :
Not sure if this will be accepted, shadow on white
Page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic    Reply to topic
Author Message
greenfield54


Joined: 21 Jun 2009
Posts: 2635
Location: Philippines

Post Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 8:13 pm     Reply with quote

Maybe one too many eggs? But that's just me. :)
triceratops


Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 7934
Location: The other Nevada

Post Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 8:17 pm     Reply with quote

ruxpriencdiam wrote:
Time to be thinking Halloween.


My Fall and Halloween shots will be going up April 15. Already starting to see some Fall images selling. Slow, but it's a beginning.
okiepony


Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Posts: 15589
Location: Finally There! :)

Post Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 9:33 pm     Reply with quote

ruxpriencdiam wrote:
copidosoma wrote:
hhltdave5 wrote:
Taras is right. If you are sending it in as an isolation (no shadows) then you would remove them. If it is going to be an on white (with shadows) then leave them in but clean it up.

If you look closely you will see two shadows. The one closest to the eggs and objects is the one you want to have in. The secondary one (more bluish) is the ones you want to clean up.

I usually do not recommend having images that contain multiple objects done as isolations.

I have to say though I am having trouble with the egg and chocolate concept. You are showing an holder that is often used with a soft boiled egg and the egg has chocolate on it. I have been cooking for almost 50 years and have seen all kinds of food but that is a new one on me. Chocolate goes well with eggs that have been made into a custard but this one has me stumped.

I have rules about food photography and one of them is if it doesn't belong don't put it in the shot.


You've never eaten a chocolate egg?!? Sometimes rules are meant to be broken.
But the egg is usually a chocolate covered marshmallow egg.


Not where I come from.
The best Easter eggs are full chocolate inside an eggshell. I have two of them in my fridge...
I've never even heard of a chocolate covered marshmallow egg in my life.... :O
geoffwnz


Joined: 10 Feb 2012
Posts: 174
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Post Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 9:35 pm     Reply with quote

okiepony wrote:
ruxpriencdiam wrote:
copidosoma wrote:
hhltdave5 wrote:
Taras is right. If you are sending it in as an isolation (no shadows) then you would remove them. If it is going to be an on white (with shadows) then leave them in but clean it up.

If you look closely you will see two shadows. The one closest to the eggs and objects is the one you want to have in. The secondary one (more bluish) is the ones you want to clean up.

I usually do not recommend having images that contain multiple objects done as isolations.

I have to say though I am having trouble with the egg and chocolate concept. You are showing an holder that is often used with a soft boiled egg and the egg has chocolate on it. I have been cooking for almost 50 years and have seen all kinds of food but that is a new one on me. Chocolate goes well with eggs that have been made into a custard but this one has me stumped.

I have rules about food photography and one of them is if it doesn't belong don't put it in the shot.


You've never eaten a chocolate egg?!? Sometimes rules are meant to be broken.
But the egg is usually a chocolate covered marshmallow egg.


Not where I come from.
The best Easter eggs are full chocolate inside an eggshell. I have two of them in my fridge...
I've never even heard of a chocolate covered marshmallow egg in my life.... :O

Come to NZ any time between Jan and Easter and you can grab a pack to indulge. Just hope you aren't diabetic. :-)
ruxpriencdiam


Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26840
Location: Third Stone from the Sun

Post Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 9:36 pm     Reply with quote

okiepony wrote:
ruxpriencdiam wrote:
copidosoma wrote:
hhltdave5 wrote:
Taras is right. If you are sending it in as an isolation (no shadows) then you would remove them. If it is going to be an on white (with shadows) then leave them in but clean it up.

If you look closely you will see two shadows. The one closest to the eggs and objects is the one you want to have in. The secondary one (more bluish) is the ones you want to clean up.

I usually do not recommend having images that contain multiple objects done as isolations.

I have to say though I am having trouble with the egg and chocolate concept. You are showing an holder that is often used with a soft boiled egg and the egg has chocolate on it. I have been cooking for almost 50 years and have seen all kinds of food but that is a new one on me. Chocolate goes well with eggs that have been made into a custard but this one has me stumped.

I have rules about food photography and one of them is if it doesn't belong don't put it in the shot.


You've never eaten a chocolate egg?!? Sometimes rules are meant to be broken.
But the egg is usually a chocolate covered marshmallow egg.


Not where I come from.
The best Easter eggs are full chocolate inside an eggshell. I have two of them in my fridge...
I've never even heard of a chocolate covered marshmallow egg in my life.... :O
Yes you have i just told you.

And you walk by these on your way into wally world when you walk into the store.
okiepony


Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Posts: 15589
Location: Finally There! :)

Post Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 9:48 pm     Reply with quote

Barry - never ate one, never knew about one.... and not gonna eat one, either...LOL
semmickphoto


Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 6632
Location: Stuck between a shutter and a hard place

Post Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 9:16 am     Reply with quote

Dave, maybe you can add this to your next book ;-) They made it.












hhltdave5


Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24312
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com

Post Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 9:36 am     Reply with quote

Happy they made it in. Interested to see how the ones with the chocolate in the egg sells.
semmickphoto


Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 6632
Location: Stuck between a shutter and a hard place

Post Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 9:38 am     Reply with quote

hhltdave5 wrote:
Happy they made it in. Interested to see how the ones with the chocolate in the egg sells.


Thanks Dave, I will for sure let you know if they sell or not.
hhltdave5


Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24312
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com

Post Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 9:46 am     Reply with quote

semmickphoto wrote:
hhltdave5 wrote:
Happy they made it in. Interested to see how the ones with the chocolate in the egg sells.


Thanks Dave, I will for sure let you know if they sell or not.


Good. Like I said the shots were fine for getting accepted. Nice and clean. Sales are what counts though. I have a feeling that the one without the chocolate will sell better than the ones with the chocolate. Anyway, I hope they do well for you.
rinder99


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39667
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder

Post Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2012 10:26 am     Reply with quote

Cool Man.
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 2 of 2 All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page Previous  1, 2

 


Shutterstock Forum for Contributors