Welcome, Anonymous (Profile, Private Messages)
Having trouble signing into the forums? Please [ logout ] and log back in.
 Log inLog in 
SEARCH:     » Advanced Search

Shutterstock Photographer Forum Forum Index : Critique / Tips / Tricks :
Critique
Page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic    Reply to topic
Author Message
turbodls1ta


Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 440
Location: T'exas, y'all

Post Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:47 pm     Reply with quote

Gonna give this another shot.. Its been a few years since my first try and subsequent rejection. I've just been taking in all the immense information and examples provided here, so I think Im ready to try again..
Does B&W work here? I know the DoF is shallow, but the key points on the face I feel are in focus..



IMG_5837-crop.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  18.52 KB
 Viewed:  878 Time(s)

IMG_5837-crop.jpg



IMG_5837-small.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  18.43 KB
 Viewed:  878 Time(s)

IMG_5837-small.jpg


ruxpriencdiam


Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26257
Location: Third Stone from the Sun

Post Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:52 pm     Reply with quote

OOF.
turbodls1ta


Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 440
Location: T'exas, y'all

Post Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:54 pm     Reply with quote

In a state park... Does it need a property release?
Too over saturated?



_MG_5620-small.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  88.25 KB
 Viewed:  869 Time(s)

_MG_5620-small.jpg



_MG_5620-crop.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  24.96 KB
 Viewed:  869 Time(s)

_MG_5620-crop.jpg


ruxpriencdiam


Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26257
Location: Third Stone from the Sun

Post Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:58 pm     Reply with quote

OOF, lighting, composition.

And you would need to check the parks policies on photographing.
turbodls1ta


Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 440
Location: T'exas, y'all

Post Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 2:59 pm     Reply with quote

Trademark on bullets?


201202035212-small.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  53.7 KB
 Viewed:  859 Time(s)

201202035212-small.jpg



201202035212--crop.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  66.42 KB
 Viewed:  859 Time(s)

201202035212--crop.jpg


turbodls1ta


Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 440
Location: T'exas, y'all

Post Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 3:01 pm     Reply with quote

ruxpriencdiam wrote:
OOF, lighting, composition.

And you would need to check the parks policies on photographing.

What would you change on composition. This is a crop of the full photo, its just there are alot of distracting branches I had to cut out..
supertramp


Joined: 29 May 2005
Posts: 4518
Location: I don't know, I'm guessing. :)

Post Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 3:22 pm     Reply with quote

turbodls1ta wrote:
ruxpriencdiam wrote:
OOF, lighting, composition.

And you would need to check the parks policies on photographing.

What would you change on composition. This is a crop of the full photo, its just there are alot of distracting branches I had to cut out..


Rule of Thirds. Put your subject 1/3 in from the edge. That should leave enough space for any text.

What lenses/camera are you using? Are you tripod-ing all shots? These seem to be more OOF than they should be.
turbodls1ta


Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 440
Location: T'exas, y'all

Post Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 3:33 pm     Reply with quote

Yep, I almost never shoot without a tripod. I, like most new people, am having a very tough time with focus. I rely mainly on auto focus as it usually trump's my own eye in MF.

Here's the stone building, cropped differently..



_MG_5620-recomp-small.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  84.06 KB
 Viewed:  833 Time(s)

_MG_5620-recomp-small.jpg


ruxpriencdiam


Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26257
Location: Third Stone from the Sun

Post Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 3:37 pm     Reply with quote

More like this and bullets have copyright/trademark on them and reviewer may mistake casing with having noise in it.


_mg_5620-small_210.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  207.71 KB
 Viewed:  825 Time(s)

_mg_5620-small_210.jpg


rinder99


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39217
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder

Post Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 3:51 pm     Reply with quote

None of these will work my friend. bad exposure,Composition,copyrights,over processing and Focus especially the B&w. "The key points in the face" are badly OOF also the B&W conversion is not very good. Sorry.
hhltdave5


Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24081
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com

Post Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 6:15 pm     Reply with quote

You can read the name on the base of the bullets. Also that shot has a white balance problem. On the orange side.
jeffbanke


Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17465
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California

Post Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 8:50 pm     Reply with quote

turbodls1ta wrote:
Trademark on bullets?

Good concept, but strange color balance, and you need to erase the name on the base of the cartridges.

Mans face is dfinitely out of focus, needs to be much sharper.

Unless you have a lens with VR/IS give up the idea that you can hand hold a camera, it is obvious from your examples that you cannot and get sharp images.
I am very concerned that you considered the important points to be in focus, because if you cannot see that this portrait is way out of focus due to movement then we cannot help you.

Images that are OOF due to auto focus or the photographer picking the wrong aperture or focal point always have some part of the image that IS in focus, images that are soft or OOF due to movement have no part of the image which is actually sharp, as is the case with your images.

Get used to using a tripod or at least a monopod.
rinder99


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39217
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder

Post Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 2:03 am     Reply with quote

I PMed you with everything you need to work on. If you do it you will Improve but ya gotta do the work.That, we can't help with.
wiml


Joined: 10 May 2011
Posts: 896

Post Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 4:47 am     Reply with quote

Watch out with WB, this might be intentional (toned, tinted) but editors might not see it that way:

Auto in PS:



201202035212-small_446-1.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  53.7 KB
 Viewed:  706 Time(s)

201202035212-small_446-1.jpg



201202035212-small_446.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  163.15 KB
 Viewed:  706 Time(s)

201202035212-small_446.jpg


turbodls1ta


Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 440
Location: T'exas, y'all

Post Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 5:26 pm     Reply with quote

Yea, I understand about the WB maybe being seen as off, but that's the way I intended it to be. Kind of that subtle camo look with really soft lighting to match the brass and olivedrab book cover. I shot it with 2700k lights here and again with 5500k strobes and these came out looking way better IMHO.
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 2 All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1, 2  Next

 


Shutterstock Forum for Contributors