Welcome, Anonymous (Profile, Private Messages)
Having trouble signing into the forums? Please [ logout ] and log back in.
 Log inLog in 
SEARCH:     » Advanced Search

Shutterstock Photographer Forum Forum Index : Critique / Tips / Tricks :
Did I take the vignette too far?

 
Post new topic    Reply to topic
Author Message
jhuls


Joined: 02 Jan 2012
Posts: 1055

Post Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 2:49 am     Reply with quote

So Sunday I had a load of rejections, I guess I may have gone a bit too far with my processing but I really wanted to have a dreamy sort of look to them. So I went a bit farther with my editing and vignette than I normally would. I had 6 images similar to this one rejected for uneven lighting due to blown highlights. I checked the images before submitting and there were no blown highlights except the ones I did intentionally to the right of the pillow for copyspace. I know technically I don't need copy space but I like to show the customer the possibilities and they can crop it out if they don't like it.

Anyway, here it is, and the next one is the original. I did check them both and there are no blown spots on either (except to the right of the one I submitted) There are some really white spots but they are not blown.

So what would you all do? redo them without the white vignette and copy space, or leave them as is and just resubmit and hope to get a nicer review?



324.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  114.93 KB
 Viewed:  1064 Time(s)

324.jpg



IMG_7322.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  144.19 KB
 Viewed:  1064 Time(s)

IMG_7322.jpg


wiml


Joined: 10 May 2011
Posts: 896

Post Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 3:45 am     Reply with quote

Yeah Jenn, although I like the vignette microstock does not, did they get accepted at FT and IS? I bet not.

Just go without or a lot less of vignette and brighten up the right side to get the lighting more even (just to make sure)

Good luck mylady ;)



img_7322_154.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  140.65 KB
 Viewed:  1037 Time(s)

img_7322_154.jpg


PaulCowan


Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Posts: 4183
Location: Evolving

Post Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 4:43 am     Reply with quote

I think the view is that a designer can easily do a selection to fade to white if they want to, so by doing that for them you are just making the pic less useful to those who wouldn't want it faded.
dlovely


Joined: 26 Oct 2009
Posts: 626

Post Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:41 am     Reply with quote

If the image was of the little girl sleeping peacefully, say with a smile on her face, perhaps the concept of "dreamy" would have worked for the reviewer. As it is, she looks upset or ill and so showing the whole scene to include the pillow makes more sense to me.

She is adorable btw!
kellythorson


Joined: 22 Sep 2011
Posts: 743
Location: Canada

Post Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:17 am     Reply with quote

I find looking at the thumbnails is a good way to assess the lighting. If there is a clear difference between one side and another I suspect you will get hit for lighting. With the amount of pictures the reviewers go through I would suspect that is one of the first things they notice. You could always put a note in for the reviewer explaining your thoughts I guess.
It's a nice image and once you get it accepted I suspect it will sell well.
jhuls


Joined: 02 Jan 2012
Posts: 1055

Post Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:37 am     Reply with quote

Thanks everyone, I think that maybe I will redo them without such a strong vignette. I think that may have been what got me and not the white space I left for copy space. I have a series of both her and a friend either pretending to be sick or sleeping. The sleeping ones the dreamy look makes more sense but the sick ones I think I definitely should ease up. I was processing them all at the same time and I didn't think about that the two should look a bit different.
mauijon


Joined: 02 Mar 2005
Posts: 4309
Location: Maui, Hawaii

Post Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 5:14 pm     Reply with quote

Jenn, I think if you had written COPY SPACE on the vignette part it would have sailed through. As is, it looks odd.
scheriton


Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Posts: 742
Location: London, UK

Post Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 5:26 pm     Reply with quote

The vignette in the first shot makes her camera-left arm look a strange grey colour, and it also affects her hair.
rinder99


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39622
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder

Post Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:14 pm     Reply with quote

hey girl, Looking unhappy or sick is Just fine, Perfect actually. The arm is what got the reviewer. the fade to white doesn't bother me That much . Could it better and a bit more Lower level adj. Yes.


324_758.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  111.49 KB
 Viewed:  835 Time(s)

324_758.jpg


kellythorson


Joined: 22 Sep 2011
Posts: 743
Location: Canada

Post Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 12:44 am     Reply with quote

Did you clone in her arm?
jhuls


Joined: 02 Jan 2012
Posts: 1055

Post Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 10:33 am     Reply with quote

Thanks again everyone, yes I did clone the arm. It wasn't quite right(because it was from another image that didn't line up exactly) so that is partly why I chose the fading. I can see now the fading didn't help. I have decided the best thing to do at this point is to do a re-edit before submitting.
robhainer


Joined: 03 May 2010
Posts: 2891
Location: Dallas, GA, USA

Post Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 12:27 pm     Reply with quote

You may already know this,but you can get a dreamy effect by reducing the clarity in lightroom or ACR. Sometimes it works nicely while keeping the eyes sharp (or you could do it in layers and do the eyes separately.)
dustine


Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 925
Location: You're in my viewfinder...

Post Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 2:16 am     Reply with quote

Can you mover her more to the corner to hide most the left arm. These guys are a top seller and that's what I did to hide an ugly fence they were partially hidden by.



And then maybe put "Your Text Here" to the right?
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT - 5 Hours

 


Shutterstock Forum for Contributors