| Author |
Message |
borojoint
Joined: 16 Apr 2010
Posts: 1772
Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:30 pm
|  |
The first image was rejected for: Lighting Problems--Purple fringe, blown highlights or lenses flare. Please see <a href="http://buzz.
I know there are some blown highlights but isn't it supposed to be that way or I pushed it too much
Second image rejected for:Trademark--Contains potential trademark or copyright infringement. Please see <a href="http://buzz.s
There is no logos there.Is SS accepting any camera images at all?
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
103.9 KB |
| Viewed: |
902 Time(s) |
|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
195.94 KB |
| Viewed: |
902 Time(s) |
|
|
|
marcusvdt
Joined: 12 Feb 2009
Posts: 1191
Location: www.flashbackfoto.com.br or www.facebook.com/flashbackfoto
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:16 pm
| |
Im looking them on my phone which is known to have a very bright screen and I can see a big lighting problem on the background. Im able to see a big blown area in the center and poor light on the background. And there is a cast of color on it.
Maybe the bad things are being increased by my screen but since i see other images here, i believe there is really a problem with your lighting.
Hope it helps.
|
|
marcusvdt
Joined: 12 Feb 2009
Posts: 1191
Location: www.flashbackfoto.com.br or www.facebook.com/flashbackfoto
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:17 pm
| |
Im talking about the first one...
|
|
robhainer
Joined: 03 May 2010
Posts: 2739
Location: Dallas, GA, USA
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:19 pm
| |
The first photo has some weird blown out bluish-purple background with banding and other issues.
And as far as I know, they don't take any images with cameras as the main subject.
|
|
hhltdave5
Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24065
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:19 pm
| |
Yes the first one has too large of a blown out area. The lighting on the food shot is just about right but the whole background section is too over the top.
As for the camera shot SS is not taking many camera shots at all because many are recognizable. That one looks very much like one of the old Nikons.
|
|
borojoint
Joined: 16 Apr 2010
Posts: 1772
Location: Bulgaria
|
|
hhltdave5
Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24065
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 6:35 pm
| |
Remember what I said with my previous post? The food portion looked pretty good, it was the background area that was the problem. Remove the bad area and you have a better shot which gets approved.
I just checked out the Zenit camera online and it has some very similar features to the old Nikons. If you look at the early Nikon F series and then look at the Zenit you can see the similarities. That is probably the reason why SS does not accept them because one can look very similar to another.
|
|
ruxpriencdiam
Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26208
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
|
rinder99
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39156
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 8:24 pm
| |
Actually Zenit copied the old Pentacon 6TL without the prism. either way. It won't fly nowdays. i like the processing although.
|
|
wiml
Joined: 10 May 2011
Posts: 896
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:38 am
| |
Hey Borojoint,
Too much blown highlights mate, even on the glass:
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
100.48 KB |
| Viewed: |
711 Time(s) |
|
|
|
| |
|
Log in
