| Author |
Message |
dawalt2002
Joined: 14 Oct 2011
Posts: 58
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:41 pm
| |
Trying another image. Not sure if the composition is too much of a snapshot
Comments/suggestions greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
174.77 KB |
| Viewed: |
847 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
156.24 KB |
| Viewed: |
847 Time(s) |

|
|
|
dawalt2002
Joined: 14 Oct 2011
Posts: 58
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:42 pm
| |
Additional crops
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
153.6 KB |
| Viewed: |
837 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
213.94 KB |
| Viewed: |
840 Time(s) |

|
Last edited by dawalt2002 on Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:43 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
rinder99

Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39140
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:42 pm
| |
need a crop on the eyes ...not the tail or bark. Thats not the subject.
|
|
dawalt2002
Joined: 14 Oct 2011
Posts: 58
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:44 pm
| |
Sorry. Uploaded the wrong crop. Should be there now.
|
|
ruxpriencdiam

Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26157
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:47 pm
| |
Soft.
|
|
jhuls

Joined: 02 Jan 2012
Posts: 1046
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:10 am
| |
| dawalt2002 wrote: | | Sorry. Uploaded the wrong crop. Should be there now. |
still looks the same to me. Needs to be on the birds eye
|
|
dawalt2002
Joined: 14 Oct 2011
Posts: 58
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 7:49 am
| |
Crop1 (3rd picture) is a 100% of the first photo.
I understand the "soft" comment and some of this may be due to the f stop that i was using. I need to experiment with this lens to find it's "sweet spot" since going back and honestly looking, a lot of the pictures are not what I expected.
To sharpen it up a bit, do you have any suggestions (other than to get it right from the shot).
Would also appreciated any comments on the composition. I thought about cropping down, but is it better to upload an uncropped photo and let the buyer crop or to do it myself.
Thanks again for all of your suggestions. I really appreciate the honest feedback.
|
|
wiml
Joined: 10 May 2011
Posts: 896
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:30 am
| |
| dawalt2002 wrote: | | To sharpen it up a bit, do you have any suggestions (other than to get it right from the shot). |
Downsize. I think around 20% should do in this case. Pop it a bit with sat/contr.
I like the 100% crop for composition, no obstructions in background, more bird, less environment. It might get rejected just for this reason.
No noise so that's ok but watch out with blue color cast and fringing (tree bark)
Always show crop on eye for peoples/animals.
Good luck mate!
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
130.65 KB |
| Viewed: |
701 Time(s) |

|
|
|
dawalt2002
Joined: 14 Oct 2011
Posts: 58
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 8:53 am
| |
Thanks for the feedback. Was exactly what I was looking for. Trying to get myself grounded with the basics and then will work on pulling the images together for submission.
Not always the sharpest tool in the shed, so thanks for being patient.
|
|
digigandalf

Joined: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 5398
Location: Twinsburg, OH
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:11 am
| |
The 100% crop is what you should shoot for as a full-size image. Or close to that.
|
|
jhuls

Joined: 02 Jan 2012
Posts: 1046
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:23 am
| |
I think the confusion it that it is not 100% crop so we just are thinking it is another image. If it is 100% crop then this is too small to submit. A true 100% crop will only show a very small portion of the head and eye not almost the whole body of the bird.
We can't really give you good critiques without 100% crop. If you image is out of focus then there is little you can do to save it. If it is only slightly soft then yes downsizing can help and a little sharpening can help but if it is even just slightly more than a little off the reviewers will know you sharpened it and they will reject it for oversharpening.
Here is what a 100% crop should look like and what a reasonably sharp photo should look like:
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
96.14 KB |
| Viewed: |
663 Time(s) |

|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
168.95 KB |
| Viewed: |
663 Time(s) |

|
|
|
dawalt2002
Joined: 14 Oct 2011
Posts: 58
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:59 am
| |
Thanks. I think we are saying the same thing :).
My 100% crop of the bird is what the composition of the picture should have been instead of the full log and background (thanks wiml, digigandalf and jhuls for pointing this out), and if I recomposed this photo to what was suggested, a 100% crop would only show the eye.
With that said, I'll take a look at this again and play around with the image (more from a learning perspective). This probably will not fly since the crop would really reduce the image too much and there won't be enough detail.
Again, thanks again for all of your comments! I really appreciate them. Now I have to just get out there and take some pictures.
|
|
semmickphoto

Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 6465
Location: Stuck between a shutter and a hard place
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 11:50 am
| |
| dawalt2002 wrote: |
With that said, I'll take a look at this again and play around with the image (more from a learning perspective). This probably will not fly since the crop would really reduce the image too much and there won't be enough detail.
|
A 100% crop doesnt remove any details. Its just a smaller part of the original photo. You wont have enough pixels to pass the minimum of 4MP, though.
|
|
dawalt2002
Joined: 14 Oct 2011
Posts: 58
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:34 pm
| |
Thanks. That's more or less what I meant. I'll get it yet.
Thanks again to everyone who commented.
|
|
semmickphoto

Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 6465
Location: Stuck between a shutter and a hard place
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:45 pm
| |
You are welcome, now get out there and make it happen :)
|
|
| |
|