Welcome, Anonymous (Profile, Private Messages)
Having trouble signing into the forums? Please [ logout ] and log back in.
 Log inLog in 
SEARCH:     » Advanced Search

Shutterstock Photographer Forum Forum Index : Critique / Tips / Tricks :
Vertical or Horizontal

 
Post new topic    Reply to topic
Author Message
dustine


Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 925
Location: You're in my viewfinder...

Post Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 3:34 am     Reply with quote

I was fortunate to get a tour of a large local cave (has a rich history...opened in 1930 it began public life as an underground nightclub during prohibition and continued so into the 50s) that's been closed to the public for many years. It was quite a challenge taking pictures in pitch darkness with only flashlights but we did get a few.

This one I took of one of the few Tri-Colored Bats we found sleeping in the cave.

I'm not sure if it would have more impact if it were submitted as a Horizontal, or Vertical image or do you think I could submit both since each is cropped a bit differently?





Thanks for any feedback.
hhltdave5


Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24078
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com

Post Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 4:28 am     Reply with quote

A buyer can always turn a horizontal into a vertical as long as there is enough size for them to work with. For me I usually will submit both (not at the same time). Personally I like the vertical one better. Often with shots such as this that could end up in a magazine I like the vertical because that is the natural orientation of a page in a magazine.
chinchoi


Joined: 26 Apr 2010
Posts: 979
Location: Kuala Lumpur, MY or birdyfoto.blogspot.com

Post Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 7:18 am     Reply with quote

i like vertical more, it look more "natural" to the subject.

but i also agree to submit both, because the horizontal has more empty space for text / cropping.
digigandalf


Joined: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 5412
Location: Twinsburg, OH

Post Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 7:28 am     Reply with quote

I think you ought to crop a little closer around the bat in both of them, if you can. It's going to be almost invisible in a thumbnail.
rinder99


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39200
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder

Post Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 9:49 am     Reply with quote

also I would clone in the rock to lose the on camera flash look.
dustine


Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Posts: 925
Location: You're in my viewfinder...

Post Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 11:16 pm     Reply with quote

Thanks guys. Digi...I'm afraid I'm as close to the bat as I can be and still meet the size requirement. I was afraid of the flash spooking, or worse yet, hurting the little guys eyes so I didn't get as close as I would have liked.

Rinder...I took your recommendation and tried to clone out the shadows. It wasn't easy to do the bat, since he had the most shadow and his fur needed to stay natural looking. I hope this works. I've added a close up of the bat after cloning the rock and before. I didn't realize there were so many harsh shadows till you mentioned it. Thanks!





 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT - 5 Hours

 


Shutterstock Forum for Contributors