| Author |
Message |
cpaulfell
Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 2419
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 5:42 pm
|  |
Comments from the pro's are always appreciated.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
136.73 KB |
| Viewed: |
1071 Time(s) |
|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
178.26 KB |
| Viewed: |
1071 Time(s) |
|
|
|
jeffbanke
Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17463
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California
|
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 5:46 pm
| |
Shadows too deep, distracting stuff on right
|
|
cpaulfell
Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 2419
|
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 6:16 pm
| |
Thanks Jeff. I dumped it.
|
|
hhltdave5
Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24081
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com
|
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 8:29 pm
| |
Now this could have been a very good and interesting shot. Yes there were some issues especially in composition to my way of thinking but I like the tone of the shot and the mood. With some adjustments a shot like this could work.
|
|
greenfield54
Joined: 21 Jun 2009
Posts: 2616
Location: Philippines
|
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 8:30 pm
| |
| cpaulfell wrote: | | Thanks Jeff. I dumped it. |
I suggest keeping it for now. So you can keep track of your progression. keep it up. :)
|
|
cpaulfell
Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 2419
|
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 11:26 pm
| |
| hhltdave5 wrote: | | but I like the tone of the shot and the mood. |
Thanks :) I like it too. Gave me a warm feeling.
I also like the feel of this one
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
126.23 KB |
| Viewed: |
989 Time(s) |
|
|
|
cpaulfell
Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 2419
|
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 11:40 pm
| |
So for stock does this birdy carry more appeal?
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
137.59 KB |
| Viewed: |
978 Time(s) |
|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
227.09 KB |
| Viewed: |
978 Time(s) |
|
|
|
rinder99
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39204
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
|
Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 12:29 am
| |
Have you searched what you up against??
|
|
cpaulfell
Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 2419
|
|
pharm
Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 9406
Location: Never quite sure
|
|
Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 10:50 am
| |
BUT, can you see the difference in those and yours?
|
|
smileus
Joined: 07 Oct 2008
Posts: 585
|
|
Posted: Tue May 08, 2012 4:08 pm
| |
Not everything that is accepted sells. There is tons of stuff that doesn't sell, I've done the maths. ;)
The "newest" search is not a good place to compare one's images to others'. The "most popular" shows what sells.
|
|
cpaulfell
Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 2419
|
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 10:24 am
| |
| smileus wrote: |
The "newest" search is not a good place to compare one's images to others'. The "most popular" shows what sells. |
Thank you for that advice and I will keep it in mind.
I don't know why but somewhere along the line I got the impression that newest images would be indicative of newest or current trends and that the older submissions would be more indicative of yesterday's fashion.
|
|
smileus
Joined: 07 Oct 2008
Posts: 585
|
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 10:50 am
| |
You're welcome. Personally I feel that some reviewers are too generous, so the newest doesn't show what buyers want. There are too many images that won't sell.
As a matter of fact, I think that's why buyers don't bother looking at the newest as much as they used to.
As for your flamingos, the second image doesn't have much to offer, but the first one could have been much better. For example you could have shot the whole bird and isolated it on black. I really like the way the feathers look. It should also be a bit brighter, but be gentle with the delicate color of the brighter feathers.
|
|
cpaulfell
Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 2419
|
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 10:55 am
| |
Thanks mate. These birds are just "down the road" so to say and as such I will be shooting them again.
|
|
| |
|
Log in
