| Author |
Message |
ruxpriencdiam
Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26285
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 6:43 pm
|  |
| kellyplz wrote: | | cpaulfell wrote: | | kellyplz wrote: | Images not being searchable with many of the most relevant keywords. This one bugs me the most and it's effecting sales, I'm sure of it.
I had high hopes for this one...not one sale yet.
It's not searchable under bird, wildlife, nature etc and I just noticed now, it's missing from my port! >:/ |
I searched under "new" for "raven" and yours came up. |
Yes, it's under raven but not bird, wildlife, nature and several others.
It should be found under ALL the keywords, that's the point of key wording and sales. |
43 pages for Raven so easy to find new.
3449 pages for Bird so hard to find new, how many pages did you look at?
4168 pages for wildlife so hard to find new, how many pages did you look at? |
|
cpaulfell
Joined: 07 Dec 2011
Posts: 2440
|
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 6:53 pm
| |
The intent of multiple keywords is for the purchaser to have the ability to narrow their search down to their specific requirements. No one is going to type in “nature” into the search hoping to find raven, or a horsetail weed, or a spider, or a waterfall etc, etc, etc. It is the same as someone typing in “blue” or "black" into the search. That would just be dumb. |
|
ruxpriencdiam
Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26285
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 7:07 pm
| |
| cpaulfell wrote: | | The intent of multiple keywords is for the purchaser to have the ability to narrow their search down to their specific requirements. No one is going to type in “nature” into the search hoping to find raven, or a horsetail weed, or a spider, or a waterfall etc, etc, etc. It is the same as someone typing in “blue” or "black" into the search. That would just be dumb. |
Yeah they will you would be surprised.
My number one seller is a sign but most of the sales are from searching for the word pole. |
|
kellyplz
Joined: 09 Mar 2009
Posts: 17521
Location: Manitoulin Island, Canada.
|
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 7:09 pm
| |
Barry I scanned "nature" for over 400 pages, none of my recent "nature" key worded images are in there as far as I can see. I did see one of Rob's newest though. |
|
ruxpriencdiam
Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26285
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 7:14 pm
| |
| kellyplz wrote: | | Barry I scanned "nature" for over 400 pages, none of my recent "nature" key worded images are in there as far as I can see. I did see one of Rob's newest though. |
Kelly quite some time back Dave said something about the description needing to be done better because the searches would be relying more on the description of the image so i went and looked under sequence and there it is at number 60. |
|
ruxpriencdiam
Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26285
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 7:17 pm
| |
And it is on page two of interesting. |
|
farbled
Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 361
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 7:19 pm
| |
| ruxpriencdiam wrote: | | Click approved then all and go to the bottom and it will tell you. |
Cool thanks. I really should explore the site someday, I've only been here 6 years or so. :) Told ya, lazy. I barely even edit my images (you can tell) and I don't look at the submit or approval emails. Fire and forget... |
|
rinder99
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39245
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 12:39 am
| |
Myself and Dave have had Hours Long video chats with the head guys. We brought up all and I mean ALL the issues one by one. They are aware of it, At least thats what they said.They assured me they are On it and I can only assume they mean what they say. And BTW, yes they read the bugs forum and are aware of everything.
My personal grip is they don't respond, They said they would work on it. Hang in there guys. |
|
andriikondiuk
Joined: 16 Apr 2011
Posts: 2508
|
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 5:17 am
| |
Hi all,
Since yesterday I have problems with uploading my new images.
thanks |
|
alexis84
Joined: 03 Nov 2009
Posts: 990
Location: Serbia
|
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 7:44 am
| |
| ruxpriencdiam wrote: | | Laurin can fix it i believe. |
+100000000 |
|
semmickphoto
Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 6529
Location: Stuck between a shutter and a hard place
|
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 8:42 am
| |
I think he just did:
| rinder99 wrote: | Myself and Dave have had Hours Long video chats with the head guys. We brought up all and I mean ALL the issues one by one. They are aware of it, At least thats what they said.They assured me they are On it and I can only assume they mean what they say. And BTW, yes they read the bugs forum and are aware of everything.
My personal grip is they don't respond, They said they would work on it. Hang in there guys. |
|
|
angelawaye
Joined: 05 Oct 2008
Posts: 565
Location: http://www.facebook.com/Angela.Waye.Art
|
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 11:51 am
| |
I remember the good ol' days when new images would sell the same day they were approved and you could actually see them in your portfolio.
Those were good times ...
Maybe they need to hire a better Exterminator? |
|
Susan
Joined: 06 May 2005
Posts: 6283
|
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 3:38 pm
| |
After a long stretch of many batches of missing images and or images with none searchable keyword etc. I had a month of reprieve... and my new images showed up when they should have and they were finally searchable.
Too bad it did not last, I thought SS was making progress on these bugs.... However my last approved batch is missing again and no where to be found.
Last edited by Susan on Thu May 10, 2012 3:54 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
semmickphoto
Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 6529
Location: Stuck between a shutter and a hard place
|
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 3:41 pm
| |
Yes, SS is the best selling site, and yes SS is also by far the most unstable site. From all other sites I only experienced one server outage on DT. Other than that nothing across 7 sites. SS is the winner on bugs. |
|
rinder99
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39245
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
|
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 6:37 pm
| |
| Susan wrote: | After a long stretch of many batches of missing images and or images with none searchable keyword etc. I had a month of reprieve... and my new images showed up when they should have and they were finally searchable.
Too bad it did not last, I thought SS was making progress on these bugs.... However my last approved batch is missing again and no where to be found. |
Thats horrible, Damn.At the meeting I brought up everything I could think of, I had a 2 page list I compiled and this was at the top. There were 5 people taking notes all along and we went into depth about certain issues and they said they have a special team they brought in 9 Months ago to address these problems specifically. Not knowing anything about the IT terms and stuff they refereed to it as a infrastructure issue. They were all ears I must say and, very Nice people and seemed very sincere.The meeting was over 2 hours long. I centered mostly on reviewing and the absolute inconsistency going on.Sorry to hear that.Im PMing you about something. |
|
| |
|
Log in
