Welcome, Anonymous (Profile, Private Messages)
Having trouble signing into the forums? Please [ logout ] and log back in.
 Log inLog in 
SEARCH:     » Advanced Search

Shutterstock Photographer Forum Forum Index : Critique / Tips / Tricks :
DOF demonstration

 
Post new topic    Reply to topic
Author Message
gromit


Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 56

Post Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 7:26 pm     Reply with quote

I do not claim to be any sort of expert, but I saw this the other day.

There's a new camera out that allows you to change focus (and see how DOF is affected) after the picture's been taken. Their website has a bunch of pictures from the camera, and you can change the focal point on the site.

Some of the pictures are somewhat noisy, and they seem to have an odd texture as you zoom in, but it gives you a good opportunity to play with DOF.

www.lytro.com
kayseepics


Joined: 30 Apr 2009
Posts: 487
Location: Here!

Post Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 8:12 pm     Reply with quote

Thanks for the link. Very interesting concept. I like the idea of being able to refocus a pic after the fact...but...the optics in these things appear to leave something to be desired. It's really the chip that does all the work and it will be interesting to see the results when it's paired up with some higher quality glass (and handles noise better). Fun stuff though.
rinder99


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39217
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder

Post Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 1:51 am     Reply with quote

Very old news I ordered one a year ago to chk it out. No Thanks. Interesting concept though.
colinbrothwood


Joined: 05 Aug 2009
Posts: 11

Post Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 8:15 am     Reply with quote

Yes interesting concept can’t see it catching on. Now where have I heard that before?)
Mike Price


Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 2919
Location: South Wales

Post Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 10:16 am     Reply with quote

From what people who have bought this say all it does is use a lens with a very high f number so that all the image is taken in focus, then the software algorithm selectively blurs areas as you "move" the focus. Image quality is apparently not great.

Mike
gromit


Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 56

Post Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 10:56 am     Reply with quote

According to this article (http://www.technologyreview.com/article/40240/), this camera wasn't released until March of 2012.

Also, each pixel on the sensor measures the angle of the incoming light; there's no cheap f-stop and blur trick.

That's not to say the optics are of sufficient quality for stock. Just kind of a cool toy.
rinder99


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39217
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder

Post Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 11:36 am     Reply with quote

Yes, agree a cool toy. The tests and such were posted a long time ago and looked very intriguing and The application seems very cool especially for video. I think we will see many improvements.
triceratops


Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 7861
Location: The other Nevada

Post Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 11:51 am     Reply with quote

Right now, from what I've read, the image quality is not up to microstock levels. Fine for most casual applications, but not stock. Will that change over time ... who knows? But not really worth going into right now for stock work. For other applications ... possibly. It's strictly usage dependent.
pharm


Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 9406
Location: Never quite sure

Post Posted: Sun May 13, 2012 9:03 am     Reply with quote

gromit wrote:
According to this article (http://www.technologyreview.com/article/40240/), this camera wasn't released until March of 2012...


True, but there have been a few threads here discussing this camera for quite a while. Here's one of them (from June 2011):

http://submit.shutterstock.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=107581

Someone recently posted a thread (which, of course, I can't find) discussing it. A friend of theirs bought one and played with it and mentioned the same thing you did - graininess/noise, etc.
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT - 5 Hours

 


Shutterstock Forum for Contributors