| Author |
Message |
gromit

Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 56
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 7:26 pm
| |
I do not claim to be any sort of expert, but I saw this the other day.
There's a new camera out that allows you to change focus (and see how DOF is affected) after the picture's been taken. Their website has a bunch of pictures from the camera, and you can change the focal point on the site.
Some of the pictures are somewhat noisy, and they seem to have an odd texture as you zoom in, but it gives you a good opportunity to play with DOF.
www.lytro.com |
|
kayseepics
Joined: 30 Apr 2009
Posts: 487
Location: Here!
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 8:12 pm
| |
Thanks for the link. Very interesting concept. I like the idea of being able to refocus a pic after the fact...but...the optics in these things appear to leave something to be desired. It's really the chip that does all the work and it will be interesting to see the results when it's paired up with some higher quality glass (and handles noise better). Fun stuff though. |
|
rinder99

Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39220
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 1:51 am
| |
Very old news I ordered one a year ago to chk it out. No Thanks. Interesting concept though. |
|
colinbrothwood
Joined: 05 Aug 2009
Posts: 11
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 8:15 am
| |
Yes interesting concept can’t see it catching on. Now where have I heard that before?) |
|
Mike Price

Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 2919
Location: South Wales
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 10:16 am
| |
From what people who have bought this say all it does is use a lens with a very high f number so that all the image is taken in focus, then the software algorithm selectively blurs areas as you "move" the focus. Image quality is apparently not great.
Mike |
|
gromit

Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 56
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 10:56 am
| |
According to this article (http://www.technologyreview.com/article/40240/), this camera wasn't released until March of 2012.
Also, each pixel on the sensor measures the angle of the incoming light; there's no cheap f-stop and blur trick.
That's not to say the optics are of sufficient quality for stock. Just kind of a cool toy. |
|
rinder99

Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39220
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 11:36 am
| |
Yes, agree a cool toy. The tests and such were posted a long time ago and looked very intriguing and The application seems very cool especially for video. I think we will see many improvements. |
|
triceratops

Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 7862
Location: The other Nevada
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 11:51 am
| |
Right now, from what I've read, the image quality is not up to microstock levels. Fine for most casual applications, but not stock. Will that change over time ... who knows? But not really worth going into right now for stock work. For other applications ... possibly. It's strictly usage dependent. |
|
pharm

Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 9406
Location: Never quite sure
|
Posted: Sun May 13, 2012 9:03 am
| |
True, but there have been a few threads here discussing this camera for quite a while. Here's one of them (from June 2011):
http://submit.shutterstock.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=107581
Someone recently posted a thread (which, of course, I can't find) discussing it. A friend of theirs bought one and played with it and mentioned the same thing you did - graininess/noise, etc. |
|
| |
|