| Author |
Message |
ruxpriencdiam
Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26253
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2012 11:12 pm
|  |
So lets hear it whats wrong with this one.
Hear is the reviewers take so what am i missing?
| Quote: | | Poor Lighting--Poor or uneven lighting, or shadows. White balance may be incorrect. |
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
87.08 KB |
| Viewed: |
1035 Time(s) |
|
Last edited by ruxpriencdiam on Thu May 17, 2012 9:41 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
bsluijk
Joined: 08 Jul 2011
Posts: 123
Location: Netherlands
|
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 1:38 am
| |
Maybe it's the dark subject? ;-)
|
|
semmickphoto
Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 6484
Location: Stuck between a shutter and a hard place
|
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 1:53 am
| |
Thanks for posting, that photo made my day ;-)
Funniest thing I have seen in a while. And I mean that in the most respectful and positive way.
|
|
mikenorton
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 3474
Location: Guide Book http://www.lulu.com/shop/mike-norton/nortons-notes/paperback/product-5079819.html
|
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 3:38 am
| |
Looks good to me.
|
|
semmickphoto
Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 6484
Location: Stuck between a shutter and a hard place
|
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 4:15 am
| |
Ok, I am going out on a limb here, it might be the eyesockets. There are some shadows there that they might want to have seen filled.
|
|
tverkhovynets
Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Posts: 749
Location: Kiev, Ukraine
|
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 4:15 am
| |
Maybe they want darker areas of the skull to be brightened up
Taras
|
|
jmci
Joined: 29 Oct 2006
Posts: 2380
Location: Northern Ireland
|
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 4:16 am
| |
Trying to be constructive here... Do I see a hint of yellow tone in the shadows?
|
|
ajancso
Joined: 18 May 2009
Posts: 1889
Location: Right Behind You
|
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 5:17 am
| |
Where is the 100% crop? ;)
|
|
ruxpriencdiam
Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26253
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 5:24 am
| |
It's no different than this one.
|
|
semmickphoto
Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 6484
Location: Stuck between a shutter and a hard place
|
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 5:26 am
| |
| ruxpriencdiam wrote: | It's no different than this one.
|
Different reviewer, different judgement
|
|
ruxpriencdiam
Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26253
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 5:42 am
| |
| semmickphoto wrote: | | ruxpriencdiam wrote: | It's no different than this one.
|
Different reviewer, different judgement |
The same reviewer more then 1 time?
Doubt it.
|
|
bsluijk
Joined: 08 Jul 2011
Posts: 123
Location: Netherlands
|
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 5:48 am
| |
Could it be that the red is blown?
Not quite (at 254) but close ...
|
|
ruxpriencdiam
Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26253
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 6:01 am
| |
| bsluijk wrote: | Could it be that the red is blown?
Not quite (at 254) but close ... |
Maybe thats it but what would that have to do with lighting, WB, shadows?
So the difference is from 99 to 100
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
120.93 KB |
| Viewed: |
885 Time(s) |
|
|
|
pjmorley
Joined: 15 Apr 2005
Posts: 3300
|
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 8:58 am
| |
The X behind the skull is a graphic isn't it? It may not be so obvious when in black but in red it's just a flat featureless X.
But my guess is the reviewer went 'Huh?' as I did when I saw it and then just clicked any old reason.
You are inviting inflammatory responses with the title of your thread.
|
|
dlovely
Joined: 26 Oct 2009
Posts: 626
|
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2012 9:28 am
| |
I don't want to discredit the reviewer but it seems like an optical illusion... when I look at the black x photo, I see a strong black x on a white background, but when I look at the red x I see a red x on a somewhat pinkish background.... for my eyes, the red X on white plays tricks and makes the bg look not quite white. Not sure if this is the issue or not?
|
|
| |
|
Log in
