Welcome, Anonymous (Profile, Private Messages)
Having trouble signing into the forums? Please [ logout ] and log back in.
 Log inLog in 
SEARCH:     » Advanced Search

Shutterstock Photographer Forum Forum Index : Critique / Tips / Tricks :
Critique for blurry and wrong white balanced pics please.

 
Post new topic    Reply to topic
Author Message
bolsher


Joined: 05 Nov 2008
Posts: 25

Post Posted: Mon May 28, 2012 2:35 pm     Reply with quote

Hi at all,

i plan a series with blurry and wrong white balanced pics.

And: Tataaaa, SS don“t accept them.

But: I ve seen such photographies at SS, so...


...what can i do?

What do you think about these pics. All meanings are welcome!



Bildschirmfoto 2012-05-28 um 21.33.18.png
 Description:
 Filesize:  236.73 KB
 Viewed:  516 Time(s)

Bildschirmfoto 2012-05-28 um 21.33.18.png



Bildschirmfoto 2012-05-28 um 21.33.23.png
 Description:
 Filesize:  177.07 KB
 Viewed:  516 Time(s)

Bildschirmfoto 2012-05-28 um 21.33.23.png



Bildschirmfoto 2012-05-28 um 21.33.30.png
 Description:
 Filesize:  106.52 KB
 Viewed:  516 Time(s)

Bildschirmfoto 2012-05-28 um 21.33.30.png


ruxpriencdiam


Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26311
Location: Third Stone from the Sun

Post Posted: Mon May 28, 2012 2:42 pm     Reply with quote

Having the BG blurry is fine if the main part of the image is in focus.

Do you have the 100% crops?
rudyumans


Joined: 19 Aug 2008
Posts: 10634
Location: www.businesshelpforyou.org www.rudyumans.com

Post Posted: Mon May 28, 2012 3:18 pm     Reply with quote

resubmit and include a note that they are High Key on purpose to give the image (and the buyer and the viewer) a relax and joyful feeling. Provided that main subject is in focus as Barry pointed out.
rinder99


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39257
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder

Post Posted: Mon May 28, 2012 4:15 pm     Reply with quote

First 2 I like. reminds me of years ago top 50 kind of work. Overblown. #3 is to far.I can see commercial value in these if there really sharp somewhere.
jeffbanke


Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17468
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California

Post Posted: Mon May 28, 2012 4:22 pm     Reply with quote

rinder99 wrote:
First 2 I like. reminds me of years ago top 50 kind of work. Overblown. #3 is to far.I can see commercial value in these if there really sharp somewhere.


I agree!
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT - 5 Hours

 


Shutterstock Forum for Contributors