| Author |
Message |
Jess Wealleans
Joined: 11 Jun 2012
Posts: 163
Location: Good 'ord Yorkshire
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:02 pm
|  |
| semmickphoto wrote: | | Jess, I dont know if you want to do it yourself, but I wouldnt mind giving it a try. If you feel comfortable emailing me the original, let me know and I will send you a PM with my email address. |
I'd be comfortable doing this, i don't want to ruin it! It may be past saving but im not sure! I'll email it over? My other laptop with the original RAW's gave its last breath of life yesterday and the techy guys were only able to rescue JPEG's from that folder :( Is that ok?
Thanks everyone for your help!
|
|
semmickphoto
Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 6484
Location: Stuck between a shutter and a hard place
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:04 pm
| |
| Jess Wealleans wrote: | | semmickphoto wrote: | | Jess, I dont know if you want to do it yourself, but I wouldnt mind giving it a try. If you feel comfortable emailing me the original, let me know and I will send you a PM with my email address. |
I'd be comfortable doing this, i don't want to ruin it! It may be past saving but im not sure! I'll email it over? My other laptop with the original RAW's gave its last breath of life yesterday and the techy guys were only able to rescue JPEG's from that folder :( Is that ok?
Thanks everyone for your help! |
RAW would have been better, but I will give it a go. Sent you a PM
|
|
triceratops
Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 7860
Location: The other Nevada
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:20 pm
| |
You can knock out some of the glare by duplicating the layer, selecting a flesh color from his hand and painting over the leg area. Then reduce the opacity of the layer to around 40-45%. On a small image here, it looks better. How that would look full size is problematic.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
200.25 KB |
| Viewed: |
407 Time(s) |
|
|
|
Jess Wealleans
Joined: 11 Jun 2012
Posts: 163
Location: Good 'ord Yorkshire
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:25 pm
| |
Thank you i can tell the difference even there!
I appreciate you taking the time to do that, i really do!
|
|
libyphoto
Joined: 08 Jun 2009
Posts: 796
Location: Oz
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 5:05 pm
| |
One option is to vingette to reduce the glare.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
133.92 KB |
| Viewed: |
372 Time(s) |
|
|
|
libyphoto
Joined: 08 Jun 2009
Posts: 796
Location: Oz
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 5:06 pm
| |
Another option is to crop in and vingette.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
89.07 KB |
| Viewed: |
369 Time(s) |
|
|
|
digigandalf
Joined: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 5408
Location: Twinsburg, OH
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 6:21 pm
| |
ROFL
|
|
jhuls
Joined: 02 Jan 2012
Posts: 1046
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 6:38 pm
| |
Here is my take on it, although I don't know if it would work full sized. I opened it camera raw and adjusted the recovery. It left a small blown area. I cloned over it with other parts of the leg. And then warmed everything up with filters and painted over the brightest parts of the leg with a flesh tone color at around 10% opacity until it looked more tan than white. Once I did this I was able to burn over it a bit and got this. Like I said not sure this is possible with a large photo and bigger area to fix.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
170.88 KB |
| Viewed: |
345 Time(s) |
|
|
|
rinder99
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39182
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 7:13 pm
| |
Pretty good job.
|
|
| |
|
Log in
