Welcome, Anonymous (Profile, Private Messages)
Having trouble signing into the forums? Please [ logout ] and log back in.
 Log inLog in 
SEARCH:     » Advanced Search

Shutterstock Photographer Forum Forum Index : Critique / Tips / Tricks :
Critique - model enough?

 
Post new topic    Reply to topic
Author Message
kier0kier


Joined: 26 Jun 2012
Posts: 3

Post Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2012 5:08 am     Reply with quote

So I am thinking about using this for my initial 10. Would this pass? Critique is always appreciated! Thanks.


model-forweb.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  45.46 KB
 Viewed:  826 Time(s)

model-forweb.jpg


hhltdave5


Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24308
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com

Post Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2012 6:42 am     Reply with quote

We need to see a 100% crop to check for focus on the model's face in the mirror. I would say however that it has lighting problems. That face is a bit under exposed probably due to light fall off.

I would also say that the OOF area due to the depth of field is a bit large in relation to the model's face. A reviewer may find that a bit too distracting and take the eye off the model herself.

Probably shot at a wedding or fashion show?
ruxpriencdiam


Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26817
Location: Third Stone from the Sun

Post Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2012 7:16 am     Reply with quote

It could be cropped but you still have to deal with lighting.


model-forweb_861.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  94.33 KB
 Viewed:  778 Time(s)

model-forweb_861.jpg


digigandalf


Joined: 11 Jun 2005
Posts: 5452
Location: Twinsburg, OH

Post Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2012 7:27 am     Reply with quote

A couple of other ways to crop. With the lighting issues already mentioned, these are simply ideas to think about when shooting again.


model-forweb_861CR1.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  30.06 KB
 Viewed:  765 Time(s)

model-forweb_861CR1.jpg



model-forweb_861CR2.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  26.67 KB
 Viewed:  765 Time(s)

model-forweb_861CR2.jpg


kellythorson


Joined: 22 Sep 2011
Posts: 743
Location: Canada

Post Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2012 8:56 am     Reply with quote

Seems like a risky concept for the initial submission. There is too much room for the reviewer's preferences. One might judge it to be too much out of focus in the front while another might like it.
rinder99


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39645
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder

Post Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2012 9:02 am     Reply with quote

Agree with kelly.
pharm


Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 9422
Location: Never quite sure

Post Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:19 am     Reply with quote

It would also be better if the model's face were brighter than the back of her head.
rinder99


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39645
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder

Post Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:29 am     Reply with quote

This just doesn't work on many levels.
jeffbanke


Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17518
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California

Post Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2012 1:08 pm     Reply with quote

Just one of those levels is the thing edge or frame of the mirror) growing out of her head, which could be avoided by taking the shot from the left side of the model.
mikenorton


Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 3566
Location: Guide Book http://www.lulu.com/shop/mike-norton/nortons-notes/paperback/product-5079819.html

Post Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 2:13 am     Reply with quote

I like your original composition but the human eye will see the brightest part of the picture first. So next time try this: make sure there is more light on the models face than her back, make sure the model and stylist are wearing dark clothes (not an open back dresses) and that neither is not a blonde.
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT - 5 Hours

 


Shutterstock Forum for Contributors