Welcome, Anonymous (Profile, Private Messages)
Having trouble signing into the forums? Please [ logout ] and log back in.
 Log inLog in 
SEARCH:     » Advanced Search

Shutterstock Photographer Forum Forum Index : Critique / Tips / Tricks :
Advice for Motion Photography

 
Post new topic    Reply to topic
Author Message
Jess Wealleans


Joined: 11 Jun 2012
Posts: 163
Location: Good 'ord Yorkshire

Post Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 1:28 pm     Reply with quote

Hello everyone, long time no see (been on holiday+broken laptops!)

I was with my friend yesterday at a showjumping competition, and took my trusty little olympus E420. Tried some motion pictures, but the light was horrifically overcast, and i didn't know how to get a sharp image from it. I've got sharp ones in bright light but it was very overcast and drizzling.

Here's a picture that i got. How can i lose the noise and get it sharp even in such low light? How can i increase the shutter speed, but keep the exposure up enough, and the noise low? Is it just a case of a good lense? If so, any pointers as to which one?

Anyway, thanks in advance for your blooming valuable advice and i'll go out to another event in a couple of weeks to have a go again!



PR500.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  190.37 KB
 Viewed:  607 Time(s)

PR500.jpg



cropPR.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  254.74 KB
 Viewed:  607 Time(s)

cropPR.jpg


semmickphoto


Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 6544
Location: Stuck between a shutter and a hard place

Post Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 1:36 pm     Reply with quote

Have him jump in a bright lit studio :)
Jess Wealleans


Joined: 11 Jun 2012
Posts: 163
Location: Good 'ord Yorkshire

Post Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 1:40 pm     Reply with quote

semmickphoto wrote:
Have him jump in a bright lit studio :)



May take some serious expense and setting up!

However, that just gave me an idea, I live very close to Bishop Burton College, which is housing the training for the chinese equestrian team for London 2012 Olympics, so they'll use the brand new floodlit state of the art indoor areana. It's boarded in white with almost white sand surface... potential ready made studio...
semmickphoto


Joined: 12 Feb 2012
Posts: 6544
Location: Stuck between a shutter and a hard place

Post Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 1:44 pm     Reply with quote

See... there you go
pjmorley


Joined: 15 Apr 2005
Posts: 3300

Post Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 1:54 pm     Reply with quote

You have no control over light levels here so you just have to accept that there are limits to what you can do with the gear you have. A faster lens would help, I note your aperture is f/5.6 from the EXIF data. Using a lens at f/2.8 would allow to halve your ISO to 200 instead of the 400 that is used but actually, lots of cameras are capable of virtually noise free images at ISO 400. Is this a relatively old camera or does it have a small sensor?

Even then, once you are wide open, you only have ISO to play with if you want to keep shutter speeds up and you have to accept that higher ISO comes with a bit of noise. In the real world, a bit of noise isn't a problem, it's only when you try to submit to microstock that it really becomes an issue.
Jess Wealleans


Joined: 11 Jun 2012
Posts: 163
Location: Good 'ord Yorkshire

Post Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 1:56 pm     Reply with quote

pjmorley wrote:
Is this a relatively old camera or does it have a small sensor?


Only three years but it's had some hard handling i must admit, and it was exceptionally cheap anyhow. Would a telephoto lens make a difference??
hhltdave5


Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24100
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com

Post Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 2:10 pm     Reply with quote

Jess Wealleans wrote:
pjmorley wrote:
Is this a relatively old camera or does it have a small sensor?


Only three years but it's had some hard handling i must admit, and it was exceptionally cheap anyhow. Would a telephoto lens make a difference??


The lens you use is really more important than the camera. Cheap lens and you can end up with sub par images. More expensive lenses are usually faster which will allow you to shoot in lower light. Given a choice I would pick a top lens over a top camera any day.

But like PJ said if you have a camera with a smaller sensor you are going to have a tougher time of it when it comes to noise than with one that has a larger sensor. As said you can only do so much with the equipment you have.
rinder99


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39282
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder

Post Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 2:24 pm     Reply with quote

Olys are kinda famous for noise.
Jess Wealleans


Joined: 11 Jun 2012
Posts: 163
Location: Good 'ord Yorkshire

Post Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 2:28 pm     Reply with quote

It was a present, so unfortunately i couldn't be picky! Just waiting for my lovely student loan to come in september then i may part exchange my Olympus for a Canon/Nikon or just a better Olympus. I like shooting Sports, i think i've found something that i will actually invest some serious money into! are telephoto lenses with low f.stops the way forward here?
jeffbanke


Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17469
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California

Post Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 2:29 pm     Reply with quote

Basically, you cannot get there from here, I mean even with a really good camera, and the best of lenses, one is going to have difficulty on days like the one you mentioned.

You cannot go down to f2.8 because you need the DOF to get the horse and the jump in focus

You cannot go up in ISO without introducing noise, even the best of cameras are going to have difficulty going beyond ISO 1600 and still getting the image accepted for stock.

You cannot lower the shutter speed below 1/1000 th without getting blur from the movement of the tail which will be moving much faster than the horse due to the whip effect. (Tip of the whip moves faster than the handle and causes the crack noise)

So, basically you are between a rock and a hard place, you don't have the right gear to do it, nor do you have the right lighting. Sorry but true.

Shoot on days where you can shoot at 1/1000th at f5.6-8 and ISO 100-200
Jess Wealleans


Joined: 11 Jun 2012
Posts: 163
Location: Good 'ord Yorkshire

Post Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 2:40 pm     Reply with quote

With the weather being like it is in england this summer (for those of you who don't know - torrential rain + flooding constantly across everywhere so clouds everywhere but also hot at the same time, gah)so it's generally not ideal AT all for it.

Hopefully i can get some late july/early august that are better. Thanks for your help though!
jeffbanke


Joined: 18 Dec 2005
Posts: 17469
Location: www.xlr8photo.com, The real California

Post Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 3:04 pm     Reply with quote

You are welcome, and yes telephoto lenses with low F stop capability are the way to go for sports, but are extremely pricy for good glass ($xxxx) anything less is not going to get you where you want to be
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT - 5 Hours

 


Shutterstock Forum for Contributors