Welcome, Anonymous (Profile, Private Messages)
Having trouble signing into the forums? Please [ logout ] and log back in.
 Log inLog in 
SEARCH:     » Advanced Search

Shutterstock Photographer Forum Forum Index : Illustrators Forum :
Keyword forbidden

 
Post new topic    Reply to topic
Author Message
cyborgwitch


Joined: 19 Dec 2010
Posts: 456
Location: Netherlands

Post Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 3:42 am     Reply with quote

Why is the keyword "logo" forbidden, yet when I type in that exact word in search, the site returns 112 pages of result where the word is allowed?

It baffles me really. Why are the standards not equal for everyone?
theohrm


Joined: 16 Aug 2009
Posts: 455
Location: Ireland

Post Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 5:49 am     Reply with quote

Checking the keywords of the most recent suggests they are turning up because "logo" is used in the title.

The reason "logo" is banned as a keyword is because the license doesn't allow use as a logo.
akaiser


Joined: 09 Feb 2008
Posts: 2379
Location: Munich

Post Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:12 am     Reply with quote

Some time ago, I came across something funny, too:
You can't even type in the word "colored", but get an error message saying "you may not use ..."! Apparently it's regarded as not "politically correct" (what I do understand, of course), but in my case it was about a (hand-) colored illustration of some birds. *g I mean ... I always thought "we Germans" were pretty sensitive regarding such, but now things are getting complicated for me, too. ;)
cyborgwitch


Joined: 19 Dec 2010
Posts: 456
Location: Netherlands

Post Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 8:29 am     Reply with quote

Well, in my case I didn't use the word "logo" as a keyword, but I used it in the title. That isn't allowed either. I'm OK with that, but shouldn't the same rules apply for everyone? Or perhaps those that use the word have changed the title and/or keywords after their work was approved?

@akaiser: "Colored" isn't allowed, but is "color" permitted?
akaiser


Joined: 09 Feb 2008
Posts: 2379
Location: Munich

Post Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 9:15 am     Reply with quote

It is. "Hand-colored" also works and both british versions ("colour", "hand-coloured").
And yes! The rules should apply to everyone in the same way. If it's technically possible to completely block a word like "colored", they could do the same with "logo", right?
cyborgwitch


Joined: 19 Dec 2010
Posts: 456
Location: Netherlands

Post Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2012 9:19 am     Reply with quote

Agreed!
daemys


Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 2092
Location: Where the president cosplays a white crane

Post Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 3:07 am     Reply with quote

The word logo was acceptable before it was forbidden
akaiser


Joined: 09 Feb 2008
Posts: 2379
Location: Munich

Post Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 7:38 am     Reply with quote

daemys wrote:
The word logo was acceptable before it was forbidden

Sure, but *when*? I got a rejection for using the word "logo" as a keyword for my first set of 3d-icons - and that was at least three years ago. *g
evaners


Joined: 04 Mar 2008
Posts: 6588
Location: NO! We aren't there yet!

Post Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 6:01 pm     Reply with quote

Hi everyone! Yes, logo is forbidden and is not supposed to be used in the keywords, title or in the image itself. But it does often get past the reviewers, and those people are the lucky ones since their image will be found by the buyers who obviously don't know the rules we follow, and search for logos.

_______________________________

The word "colored" in the United States has very old racial meanings. It was used derogatorily toward African Americans and has a very ugly history. Imagine that there was a time that you could see two drinking fountains, and above one was a sign that said "Whites Only" and a sign on the other that said "Colored". Also on bathrooms, restaurant entrances, etc.

It breaks my heart to say that could happen in my country -- and only 50 years ago. So there are, naturally, some bad feelings about such words here still.
akaiser


Joined: 09 Feb 2008
Posts: 2379
Location: Munich

Post Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:17 pm     Reply with quote

I know, Evan.
I just didn't get the problem all at once, because I was referring to the technique of "coloring" an illustration. I'm a little slow, sometimes. :)
Btw: Strangely, the corresponding German word "farbig", which has also a double meaning, isn't offending at all. It hasn't the same tragic history, but someone eventually decided it was better than saying "black" or something else.
(In German, it's really difficult to stay "up to date" regarding such. *g Instead of "Ausländer" which translates as "foreigner", we need to say "Bürger mit Migrationshintergrund" now, which - indeed! - hits the point of most discussions much better, because it also includes second (or more) generation immigrants, but it's pretty complicated instead. And sometimes there may be a legitimate reason to point out a difference.)
Well, ... language is always a matter of context, while I'll never understand why *some* people - obviously - need someone to take things out on. Someone who's "different" - no matter in which way. "Normal" people will never get that. Even more if you're German and aware of our history.


Last edited by akaiser on Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:32 pm; edited 1 time in total
akaiser


Joined: 09 Feb 2008
Posts: 2379
Location: Munich

Post Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:27 pm     Reply with quote

I still don't feel offended, if someone calls me "blond", btw. ;)
*the last laugh is on me*
daemys


Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 2092
Location: Where the president cosplays a white crane

Post Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:28 am     Reply with quote

akaiser wrote:
daemys wrote:
The word logo was acceptable before it was forbidden

Sure, but *when*? I got a rejection for using the word "logo" as a keyword for my first set of 3d-icons - and that was at least three years ago. *g


In 2007 I submitted many illustrations with logo keyword. Then they introduced the prohibition.
akaiser


Joined: 09 Feb 2008
Posts: 2379
Location: Munich

Post Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 2:03 am     Reply with quote

daemys wrote:
akaiser wrote:
daemys wrote:
The word logo was acceptable before it was forbidden

Sure, but *when*? I got a rejection for using the word "logo" as a keyword for my first set of 3d-icons - and that was at least three years ago. *g


In 2007 I submitted many illustrations with logo keyword. Then they introduced the prohibition.

Yeah, ... you hardly get used to things and *woooooosh!* it's over again. ;)
jeanpierre


Joined: 04 Jun 2010
Posts: 251
Location: Quebec

Post Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 1:46 pm     Reply with quote

daemys wrote:
The word logo was acceptable before it was forbidden



:O)
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT - 5 Hours

 


Shutterstock Forum for Contributors