| Author |
Message |
Charles Kwan
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 18
|
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 9:38 pm
|  |
Hello, I am sorry to ask similar question again. I found a photo from existing SS which is a Hong Kong tram run in street. However, the logo/trademark/advertisement clearly shows in the photo. Also, the building behind to the tram is a private property for a restaurant. I doubt if the photographer can get such property release from those advertisement and restaurant owners. In fact, I think the photographer cannot get it. Then, why SS approve this photo? Many thanks for your reply.
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
66.71 KB |
| Viewed: |
398 Time(s) |
|
|
|
ruxpriencdiam
Joined: 07 May 2009
Posts: 26285
Location: Third Stone from the Sun
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 10:03 pm
| |
| Charles Kwan wrote: | | Hello, I am sorry to ask similar question again. I found a photo from existing SS which is a Hong Kong tram run in street. However, the logo/trademark/advertisement clearly shows in the photo. Also, the building behind to the tram is a private property for a restaurant. I doubt if the photographer can get such property release from those advertisement and restaurant owners. In fact, I think the photographer cannot get it. Then, why SS approve this photo? Many thanks for your reply. |
| Quote: | Image ID: 100364540
Release information:
Editorial Use Only. Use of this image in advertising or for promotional purposes is prohibited. |
It can only be used as editorial!
|
|
hhltdave5
Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24090
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 7:09 am
| |
| Charles Kwan wrote: | | Hello, I am sorry to ask similar question again. I found a photo from existing SS which is a Hong Kong tram run in street. However, the logo/trademark/advertisement clearly shows in the photo. Also, the building behind to the tram is a private property for a restaurant. I doubt if the photographer can get such property release from those advertisement and restaurant owners. In fact, I think the photographer cannot get it. Then, why SS approve this photo? Many thanks for your reply. |
As Barry pointed out this shot was submitted and accepted as an editorial image. Editorial images can have copyright/trademark protected items in them but they must show that they are newsworthy. If they do and are titled properly they can be accepted but only as an editorial images which has different uses assigned to it.
|
|
Charles Kwan
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 18
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 9:55 am
| |
Many thanks for your explanation. Now I understand what is editorial.
|
|
| |
|
Log in
