Welcome, Anonymous (Profile, Private Messages)
Having trouble signing into the forums? Please [ logout ] and log back in.
 Log inLog in 
SEARCH:     » Advanced Search

Shutterstock Photographer Forum Forum Index : Anything Goes. :
Check this out! - Yuri Arcurs
Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
 
Post new topic    Reply to topic
Author Message
Logos


Joined: 05 Feb 2005
Posts: 447
Location: Århus, Denmark

Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 8:51 pm     Reply with quote

Beginning Jan 2008 I will start to produce exclusively with the brand new Hasselblad H3D-II-39 at 39 Mega Pixel. This is probably way overkill for microstock, but I have a vision that one day microstock will be ready for this kind of material.
I have included a few crops for you guys and I think they speak for themselves.

Having worked with this camera for a few months now I am getting a little spoiled with what to expect from a digital camera. The resolution that the Hasselblad produce is simply mindblowing and since I started using it I have not had one single file rejected for looking too overfiltred. Not one! The files from the H3D are simply much cleaner and natural looking and are in a class of their own – completely! I haven’t been able to find noise anywhere on any files, which was a little hard to believe the first few weeks of shooting. Being used to shadow noise even at ISO 100 on my old Mark II, I simply could not understand how it was possible.

The downside is that handling files at 39mp is impossible in windows XP because of the maximum memory allocating in Photoshop under XP is less then what is required for opening just one 39mp Tiff file without having to write to hard drive cache. Another thing is that the lenses are HUGE… not just a little bigger.. no… HUGE! About 2 kilos a piece for the ones I use. Another thing is that the RAW files are 120mb per picture and the camera shoots only one picture per second.
Even with all the extra effort it takes to handle this camera I have only one thing to say…. I will never shoot with anything else again!



Hasselblad closeup hair.jpg
 Description:
Hair at 100%
 Filesize:  129 KB
 Viewed:  30041 Time(s)

Hasselblad closeup hair.jpg



Hasselblad closeup eye.jpg
 Description:
Eye at 100%
 Filesize:  136.29 KB
 Viewed:  30041 Time(s)

Hasselblad closeup eye.jpg



Hasselblad closeup full.jpg
 Description:
Full
 Filesize:  39.44 KB
 Viewed:  30041 Time(s)

Hasselblad closeup full.jpg


helix7


Joined: 24 Apr 2007
Posts: 1790
Location: New Jersey

Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 9:22 pm     Reply with quote

That is insane!
triceratops


Joined: 15 Nov 2006
Posts: 7875
Location: The other Nevada

Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 9:24 pm     Reply with quote

Fantastic. I can even see your reflection in the eye 100% crop. With XP out of the equation, what OS did you switch to in order to handle the large file size?
luisfico


Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 460

Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 9:43 pm     Reply with quote

The right way to go when you are able to, congrats and may you succeed on this new way of making pictures!

Tell us, is there a steep learning curve with this kind of monster cameras, or is it just the same, only jumbo?

kind regards.

FICO
hhltdave5


Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 24094
Location: Our Stock, Food & Portrait photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com

Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 10:08 pm     Reply with quote

Congrats on using that piece of equipment Yuri. I am sure it will add another dimension to your already spot on work. All I can say is at least I can dream! LOL
Paul_Lewis


Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 4185
Location: Waterford, MI (Detroit)

Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 11:14 pm     Reply with quote

W.O.W.

That. Is. Impressive.
rinder99


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 39256
Location: Contact www.rinderart.com/Books and Workshops www.rindersmithphotography.com Youtube/rinder

Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 11:30 pm     Reply with quote

ATTA Boy. I've been a hassy man for 30+ years. Used the H3 on product shoot's . You will Love it.
andy777


Joined: 09 Sep 2006
Posts: 311
Location: California

Post Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 11:41 pm     Reply with quote

All I can say is "WOW"
pharm


Joined: 09 Jul 2006
Posts: 9406
Location: Never quite sure

Post Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 12:15 am     Reply with quote

Magnificent.
camdoc3


Joined: 30 Jun 2006
Posts: 1547
Location: trinidadimages.com

Post Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 6:48 am     Reply with quote

Having used and custom printed with the old (Film) Hassleblads for many years the quality does not surprise me ! Unfortunatly the price puts it out of my ballpark!
riffmax


Joined: 10 Mar 2005
Posts: 3102
Location: Florida, USA

Post Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 8:27 am     Reply with quote

Wow. That's all I can say is wow.

And all I want for Christmas is D80!

***sigh***

Well, maybe someday. In the meantime, Yuri, I hope you don't mind if I use your port and your story for inspiration and motivation! You are quite the success story!
varius


Joined: 19 Mar 2006
Posts: 5593
Location: Bietigheim - Bissingen, Germany

Post Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 8:35 am     Reply with quote

Holy cow...

Now THAT is a camera that would allow the good old CSI tricks of super-enlarging stuff to make out a licence number plate in the reflection of a drop of sweat on the villain's forehead. ;-)

Let me guess, the price point (including new glass and other neccessary hardware) is somewhere between an average European year's income and a holyday trip to the ISS? ;-)
mlopes


Joined: 31 Dec 2005
Posts: 362
Location: Lisbon

Post Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 8:56 am     Reply with quote

Man ... your are really playing hard ball here. Wish you tons of luck with your new weapon (that's not a toy anymore).
Logos


Joined: 05 Feb 2005
Posts: 447
Location: Århus, Denmark

Post Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:38 am     Reply with quote

Taking a break from shooting now to write this.
The price for the full line-up (five lenses, all the extras and the camera) is about 80000 USD. I don't pay that because of my sponsorship agreement with Hasselblad, but that's what It would cost.

The learning curve is not high at all, and managing white balance and getting the skin tones right is actually much easier. The camera is much more intuitive to handle and way more thought through.
luisfico


Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 460

Post Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:50 am     Reply with quote

Logos wrote:
The camera is much more intuitive to handle and way more thought through.


Must be.

Well, you get what you pay for, or what your sponsor pays for right? :o)

Congrats again.
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Page 1 of 10 All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

 


Shutterstock Forum for Contributors