Welcome, Anonymous (Profile, Private Messages)
Having trouble signing into the forums? Please [ logout ] and log back in.
 Log inLog in 
SEARCH:     » Advanced Search

Shutterstock Photographer Forum Forum Index : General Shutterstock Submit Discussion :
2008 Raise Details...
Page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 30, 31, 32  Next
 
Post new topic    This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
Author Message
sumo


Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 186

Post Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 6:20 am     Reply with quote

walterq wrote:
I don't understand all the angry posts here...

We got a 10%, 20% or 27% raise. How often do you get a 10% raise? In your interest rates, your salary?

3 Cents doesn't sound much but 30 Cents isn't much in the first place!

I'm happy with the raise, at least some agency is giving more to its contributors. I know places where you suddenly get less money...


Well for me it isnt about the raise itself but the fact that for some reason sales are dropping here suddenly, For me this started sometime in April.

When new images were accepted it used to cause a surge in sales the next few day´s I dont see that anymore, why ? The raise in prices ? or number of new images online every day ?

My gripe about this raise is not so much the amount (well at first it was but after thinking about it, it is a fine raise, .36 is not great but not bad either for me at least.)
But if you get 500dl for .30 that makes $150 but when sales suddenly drop and you get 400dl and even though I get .36 per dl it ONLY adds up to $144 so I AM GETTING LESS than I did before. And for me that is the most importand issue here not the raise itself or how much it is or who gets what.

Did sales drop so much because of the raise on subscription prices?
If they did this raise may not have been a very smart move.


But it is done so all there is left to do is keep shooting and submitting and hoping things revert back to "normal" because I will NOT leave and those that do leave are mostly going to be newbies. For me to leave would be stupid because I have invested a LOT of TIME and WORK to the images I have submitted here, and to simply walk out would mean that time and work was wasted. I for one am not willing to do that and my guess is few are.


regards.
frenchtoast


Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 1261
Location: GTA Canada

Post Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 6:28 am     Reply with quote

ngporter wrote:
we submit to a site knowing the pay out and knowing how it works, why do we deserve a raise, all i do is take pics and submit like i always do?? strange place this shutterstock, ive been here for years nearly since the beging, no i dont add alot of images or comment, but i do know how hard the team works to sell images and get qc done etc

once again thanks jon and shutterstock, it really is nice to log on to the net and see money coming in while i do nothing

thanks


agree completely. We all signed up knowing the rules and the amount of the payout (I think it was $0.20 when I started) and agreed to the terms. SS doesn't have to give us a raise, there is nothing in the contract that says they will give us a raise every year, so you really have to look at it as a bonus. If you produced a lot in your time here, you were given a bonus based on your production, if you didn't no bonus for you, but the team is still generous enough to give you that bonus if and when you reach the goal they have set. As I said before, I was $40 shy of $500 last year when the raise was announced, I plugged away and built up my portfolio so I got that raise within a month and now a year later I'm over $3000 and on my way to $10000 so I can get an even bigger bonus!

We were all newbies at one point and struggled with finding what was acceptable and learning from other's trails and tribulations, you just have to remember...You only get back what you put in.
vanhart


Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1306
Location: Houston

Post Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 7:07 am     Reply with quote

Guess expectations were very high and hence some disappointment...

Shutterstock must have analyzed the data, and maybe the sub $500 contributors are COSTING shutterstock much more money (IN REVIEW) then the big guys.

Maybe we are all paying the price of review in a more even handed way.

Note that the last thing we want is people heading for the exit, I strongly believe that Shutterstock is competing based on its entire portfolio. The stronger its portfolio the better it will do.

Delivering more and better images is the only way to deserve a bigger raise.
hhltdave5


Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 10891
Location: Our stock and food photography books at www.rindersmithphotography.com

Post Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 7:12 am     Reply with quote

Like several others I have held off posting on this thread until the dust settled and people got some things off of their chest. I don't have to rehash what others like Yuri, Ro, Bobby, Laurin, Dewayne said because they have said it very well.

All I can add is that for many years I negotiated raises for the men and women on the police department I worked for. I still remember the first time I went in to negotiate. I was full of piss and vinegar and was going to knock those city administrators on their asses and get a great raise for our officers.

Well, I learned very quickly that was not going to be the case. Administrators know exactly what they are going to give as raises and how much latitude they have to go up. The decision is pretty much made on paper before the talks even begin.

This is a business and the powers that be at Shutterstock treat it as such. They crunched the numbers and came up with what they felt was best for the business. Do we agree?? Perhaps not but it is a business decision that they made and each one of us have to treat this as a business as well.

Now it is up to each of us to either get all pissy, pick up your ball and go play in another playground or take the extra money and make more than you made before. Whatever your raise was is more than you were making before and that is always better than a sharp stick in the eye.

For those who unfortunately have not reached the level to get a raise use it as an opportunity to continue to work hard to reach that level so you can start making more. Do you think the heavy hitters here made the kind of money they are in the beginning? Of course they didn't. There was a thread not to long ago about what some of the big guys made in the beginning. It was really something to see them saying they didn't come close to getting a payout.

We all start somewhere but the difference is that some will work hard so they do reach the raise level and there will be some who will whine, take their ball and go somewhere else. The decision is up to you.

For me, I am making more than I was before so I thank Shutterstock for that and hope for improvement in the future.


Last edited by hhltdave5 on Wed May 14, 2008 7:21 am; edited 1 time in total
Forgiss


Joined: 16 Mar 2005
Posts: 4852
Location: For videos of our shoots: http://forgiss.libsyn.com

Post Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 7:17 am     Reply with quote

jarek78 wrote:
jppistu wrote:
roycebair and many others similarly wrote:
10%-20% is a significant raise.

If you were getting paid a penny per dl and got a 300% raise, would you be pleased? Percentages are meaningless on their own.


If I had been happy with that penny, I'd then be delighted with the 300% raise.


I assume the point is not that you get a penny...

If I got a penny for every sale, and had 46,000 sales, and had a 300% raise, that would be something substantial, now wouldn't it!?
erikwkolstad


Joined: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 4
Location: Bergen, Norway

Post Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 7:24 am     Reply with quote

In between complaints and jubilations, I just wanted to remind people that a lot of the contributors here are not primarily in it for the money. While I certainly realize and appreciate that microstock is the main income for many professionals, a large group is here for fun and recognition (albeit small) of their work. I can only speak for myself, but I think I have many on board with me.

I'm a climate scientist by training and profession, and that's where my money comes from. For the sake of comparison, I make 50-100 times more from that than from microstock photography. The compelling reasons for me to be here at all are interaction and the review process. The latter especially has enabled me to improve my skills by leaps and bounds these last few months. That being said, of course I enjoy seeing one of my favourite pictures sell.

This is not meant as denigration of the very talented and hard-working professionals here. I just hope that there is room for all kinds of contributors. After all, it seems that SS are happy to have us. I can only hope that this raise (or lack of raise for my part) will help motivate people to improve.

All the best,

Erik
mtrebbin


Joined: 05 Jul 2007
Posts: 919
Location: Location: Locaton:

Post Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 7:38 am     Reply with quote

erikwkolstad wrote:
In between complaints and jubilations, I just wanted to remind people that a lot of the contributors here are not primarily in it for the money. While I certainly realize and appreciate that microstock is the main income for many professionals, a large group is here for fun and recognition (albeit small) of their work. I can only speak for myself, but I think I have many on board with me.

I'm a climate scientist by training and profession, and that's where my money comes from. For the sake of comparison, I make 50-100 times more from that than from microstock photography. The compelling reasons for me to be here at all are interaction and the review process. The latter especially has enabled me to improve my skills by leaps and bounds these last few months. That being said, of course I enjoy seeing one of my favourite pictures sell.

This is not meant as denigration of the very talented and hard-working professionals here. I just hope that there is room for all kinds of contributors. After all, it seems that SS are happy to have us. I can only hope that this raise (or lack of raise for my part) will help motivate people to improve.

All the best,

Erik


well said, Erik. i totally agree.
jyothi646


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 34

Post Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 7:42 am     Reply with quote

Thanks Jon and SS team for the raise.
Wishing the company more growth and success in the future !

Jyothi - India :)
mwpenny


Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 65
Location: Swansea UK

Post Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 7:59 am     Reply with quote

this 'raise' and the drop off in sales (no spike when you upload) are beginning to worry me
sandralise


Joined: 19 Oct 2005
Posts: 546
Location: Quebec,Canada

Post Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 8:21 am     Reply with quote

I am in the 38 cents bracket. I thank SS for the raise. I think it is fare although more would have been appreciated.
What I am more worried about is the drop in DL's. It is true the raise is irrelevant if fewer are buying our work.
Captured Nuance


Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Posts: 1609
Location: So Cal

Post Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 8:29 am     Reply with quote

mwpenny wrote:
this 'raise' and the drop off in sales (no spike when you upload) are beginning to worry me


Ditto
Captured Nuance


Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Posts: 1609
Location: So Cal

Post Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 8:29 am     Reply with quote

sandralise wrote:
I am in the 38 cents bracket. I thank SS for the raise. I think it is fare although more would have been appreciated.
What I am more worried about is the drop in DL's. It is true the raise is irrelevant if fewer are buying our work.


Ditto again
:)
debr7k


Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 994
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Post Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 8:57 am     Reply with quote

prairierattler wrote:
debr7k wrote:
prairierattler wrote:
Logos wrote:

What you are missing is that income from SS is relative to income at similar places...


Thanks for the reply Yuri. I understand your position much better as I'm sure many others now do.


geez prairie mike, normally i think you're the greatest - but today - well - that's one snarky comment.


Absolutely not intended as "snarky". Apologize if it came across that way.



I'm sorry - I think it read as snarky because of the way you quoted him - my mistake
gregor


Joined: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 826
Location: Netherlands

Post Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 9:20 am     Reply with quote

I don't feel like reading all the posts.
All I want to say is this:
Thanks SS for the raise, but Im not very happy!
Im seriously concerned about SS's future!
SS started out as my #1 earner, now they are #3!
Im not a business strategy expert, but this is not going in a good direction!

I also don't understand why SS didn't learn a lesson from all the fuzz about the previous raise. Same story; a lott of contibutors where promised a raise, but they didn't get any! Why didn't they make that clear in the upcoming raise anouncement? That would have prevented a lott of disapointed contributors!
gina


Joined: 15 Sep 2005
Posts: 121
Location: Phuket, Thailand

Post Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 9:33 am     Reply with quote

Thanks for the raise SS. I am very happy with the increase. I live in Thailand so that extra $50-80 dollars a month will buy a lot of noodles!
 
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. Page 31 of 32 All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 30, 31, 32  Next

 


Shutterstock Forum for Submitters